Lives in United States United States
Joined on Mar 9, 2010


Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Nikon announces development of flagship D5 DSLR (442 comments in total)

And here we thought Nikon packed up shop and stopped working on new products. It's obvious to see who the fools here are.

Link | Posted on Nov 18, 2015 at 15:46 UTC as 95th comment
On article Otus Readings: the Zeiss 85 F1.4 Otus Comparison (224 comments in total)

"Moore's progress has been slowing down a bit in the computing world."

Was the use of "bit" in reference to Moore's Law intentionally humorous?

Link | Posted on Jul 1, 2015 at 09:16 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Glen K Wells: I have a NEX-7 for sale with some gold glitter glued on and a tinsel strap, anyone willing to give me £6500

Look the king is wearing no clothes!?!

Why so cheap? Is anything wrong with it?

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 09:00 UTC
On article Manfrotto launches XPRO Ball Head (30 comments in total)
In reply to:

Drazen Stojcic Buntovnik: One more vote for Really Right Stuff. Expensive, but worth every single penny. I'd never go back to Manfrotto when it comes to ball heads.

Manfrotto for ballheads is a bad choice. I bought a head for around $200 and soon after realized I should have spent a few more dollars on a RRS head. Live and learn, I guess.

Link | Posted on Jun 26, 2015 at 08:55 UTC
In reply to:

jhinkey: Sorry, no sympathy to the photographer. Don't like it, don't sign the contract.
Don't like these kind of contracts, form a union and boycott Ms. Swift, but don't whine.
What happened between Apple/Swift has no relation to the disagreement that this photographer has with Swift. He's just using the Apple/Swift coverage to promote his unhappiness with the contract he signed.

If you read it, you'd know the photog was not spot on, and her management responded and corrected the falsehoods he made. I hope you can read. The photog is using this to further his own agenda.

Link | Posted on Jun 25, 2015 at 08:53 UTC
On article Canon USA drops prices on 31 high-end L lenses (58 comments in total)
In reply to:

riveredger: It's funny that some of these lenses are priced higher than motorcycles. I mean, really!?

Somebody skipped cost accounting ^^^

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2015 at 07:09 UTC
On photo Tamron15-30_DSC_0071_ISO64_1_15s-F8 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (4 comments in total)

I was expecting Multnomah Falls!

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2015 at 23:55 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies
On a photo in the Field Test Samples: Tamron 15-30mm F2.8 Di VC USD sample gallery (4 comments in total)

I was expecting Multnomah Falls!

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2015 at 23:55 UTC as 2nd comment | 2 replies

I bought a Benro B3 Ballhead. I wish I hadn't bought it. I'll do more research next time....

Link | Posted on Apr 8, 2015 at 04:35 UTC as 24th comment
On article Go wide! Hands-on with Canon's 11-24mm F4 L (217 comments in total)

I thought the lens was large until I saw the price. It had better be the most magnificent piece of glass in that focal range by a decent margin.

Link | Posted on Feb 11, 2015 at 05:04 UTC as 11th comment
On article Canon EOS-1D C sees $4000 price drop in North America (250 comments in total)
In reply to:

razadaz: Its price drops like these that put me off investing in any expensive camera. I know of no other manufacturing business where prices drop continuously after a product is launched. Even software companies like Adobe (where development cost is high but the production cost is zero) don’t drop their prices like this.

PicOne, it's not their fault they don't understand the concept of "investment" or "investing"....

A purchase is not an investment. Investment assumes a return that exceeds the value of the purchase price of an item, with the time-value of money factored in. Your camera will mostly likely not appreciate, unless you're really famous.

Please stop saying investment when you mean something totally different.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2015 at 06:44 UTC

Their Warranty Expense account just grew a bit.

Link | Posted on Jun 8, 2014 at 04:30 UTC as 7th comment
In reply to:

bobbarber: I wonder if people will post about the "affordable" price of FF on this thread. I'm sure the 400 2.8 is an awesome lens, but 12 grand? Really?

For these reasons it's apparent both of you don't understand business and never will.

Link | Posted on May 14, 2014 at 14:42 UTC
On article DxOMark Mobile report: Sony Xperia Z2 takes top spot (146 comments in total)
In reply to:

a1strank: Put the 1" RX100 sensor in that thing and just take my money

Why mot medium format?

Link | Posted on Apr 9, 2014 at 04:22 UTC
In reply to:

Jogger: I dont think DPR should be covering pro-cine equipment. Just leave that to EOSHD or dvuser.

I enjoy looking at these items and if DPR does it, I don't need to go elsewhere.

Link | Posted on Apr 2, 2014 at 13:58 UTC
On article Zeiss announces Compact Zoom CZ.2 15-30mm T2.9 lens (57 comments in total)

can i put this on a d3000 for taking cat pics?

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2014 at 19:04 UTC as 5th comment
On article Nikon to offer D600 replacements if 'spots' continue (175 comments in total)
In reply to:

Benarm: Better late than never, but the Nikon's respect has been tarnished.


Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2014 at 18:17 UTC

This lens needs to be in its own category. This is very very impressive by the sharpness only.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2014 at 02:15 UTC as 57th comment

More like US Patent Troll.

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2013 at 17:23 UTC as 50th comment | 2 replies
Total: 36, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »