Edgar_in_Indy

Oh boy. Anybody who even knows what "equiv" denotes will also know that it does not even need to be stated.

And as for cropping, you're already at a disadvantage on the telephoto lens due to the combination of the smaller sensor and smaller aperture. Cropping is not recommended. My experience with the...

Yes, 85-125mm would not normally be a very impressive range, but it's a whole different ball game when the "camera" in question already has a couple wider primes built in that are only a tap away....

@milek: My Pixel 6 Pro's telephoto is 104mm equiv. I enjoy shooting with it a lot, but framing is sometimes difficult since it can be either too long or too short. Being able to pick anything...

Not a very good point though, since there are a couple wider lenses included. 85-125mm gives you some flexibility for framing when shooting portrait/telephoto.

"Russian Ark" was filmed with the Sony Sony HDW-F900. It's a 3-sensor camera with separate 2/3" CCD sensors for red, blue, and green. It's the same camera George Lucas used to shoot Star Wars...

"Russian Ark" from 2002 is a good example of a movie that was pushing the boundaries of technology at the time, but is now "stuck" in HD.

It was shot as a single 96 minute take involving more than...

I also feel like the dog looks slightly more morose in the reconstructed picture...

Apparently the only way to get call-recording on my Pixel 6 Pro is to root it and then install some 3rd-party call-recorder app. I'm just wondering if anybody has ever rooted their Pixel 6, and ...

I'm having trouble seeing the banding. I've been shooting digital cameras since the early days, and my first DSLR was an Olympus E-420 in 2008, so I've seen more than my fair share of banding from ...

Even if there were a small advantage to dual IS, I would still prefer an unstabilized lens.

Adding OIS to a lens means more parts that can fail, a more complex optical formula, more weight/size,...

I've never heard of Nokia "Pureview", but as a general rule I usually find that phone camera photos look much better down-sized. I've long felt that most phones are too ambitious in their ...

You may have a point. In the past, low-light performance really referred to how well a camera sensor performed at high-ISO. Photographers will often have to shoot at high-ISO even when light is not ...

Well, I can't say I have a whole lot of instances where I need to take a great picture in conditions where it's hard even to see. At that point we're starting to get a little ridiculous.

Not sure if I agree. The first picture was shot at f2 and 1/3 sec at ISO 664 and could still be considered under-exposed. Seems like it must be pretty dim to me. For me the bigger issue is that the ...

Sure, I use wired over wireless whenever I can. But why not both is my point.

This is such a good idea that I would have thought it was an April Fool's joke if it was posted a couple weeks earlier. Seems like it would be much more useful though if it could also connect...

Sure. You can find the RAW's, the JPG's from RAW, and the SOOC JPG's here, along some of the RAW files from earlier in the thread: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1sPJHftsxGCUVXqO8H_zUEpLDdC ...

Lol, I guess you must feel better now after returning to get your little dig in?

"Sometimes they multiply by four because there’s a fourth, white, sub-pixel to boost brightness"

Yeah, that's right, I forgot about that. Shenanigans, lol.

But it does become difficult to figure...