Eric Hensel

I've used them -compared to any Japanese camera of the day, they were junk.

Betcha this one won't have them either. The Sony is under $900 -buy a lens to make up for the lack.

Just buy a Sony A7.

.

Nick -you seem to be unaware (since you mentioned that PC thing twice) that half the prisoners in jail, are there for what are, essentially, victimless crimes.

"Some Bluetooth transmission protocols are taking us back to the day of low bit-rate MP3. No thank you!" That is the problem, right there. I can get a very neutral sounding pair of in-ears for $75...

"Compromising journalistic integrity or selling out isn't an acceptable "middle ground" but hey, if that's cool with you then that's great."
Mighty big words, son.

You live in a black or white world, Samuel? No middle ground...which is where the action is, btw.

Bla bla bias bla

I noticed the WB change too. Lets compare apples to apples.

That's known as 'confirmation bias'.

She looks so edgy with that ciggie...

Excellent point.

I see nothing more than a fad -but time always tells...

I was using it in the 60s and 70s. Kodachrome was the pros choice then --that's a *fact*.
I was completely done with slide film by the 80's. I have no doubt Kodak improved Ektachrome over the...

"Tell that to the National Geographic and its readers."
The vast majority were shot on Kodachrome.

" People love the look, that's why they fake it with bad digital filters all the time."
Some people. Some people do many things that make no real sense...it's a big world out there.

Used slide film since the late 50's -I was happy to move on with digital.

Kodachrome 25

Ektachrome was second-rate in its heyday...colors were terrible, and it faded quickly.