Elaka Farmor

Joined on Jun 19, 2011

Comments

Total: 209, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

vermaden: Where is 4k?

Samuel C, (1), what do you know if I record shaky home movies or not? (2) Actually I want a still camera that produce great sharp videos as well. I have a lot of expensive Canon glasses and a 6 years old Canon 600D. Still waiting for a Canon body with great video. That´s why I care.

Link | Posted on Jul 3, 2017 at 23:41 UTC
In reply to:

Mateus1: We are Canon: Welcome in 2013!

My 5 years old Lumix LX-7 has 1080p 60fps too and I doubt this Canon will beat it in video quality.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 17:41 UTC
On article Video: First look at the Canon EOS 6D Mark II (128 comments in total)
In reply to:

Zoom Zoom Zoom: :
2017, $2000, no 4K, no focus peaking.. let me stop right here.

Gotta tell you, some of these Canon executives and board of directors approving and greenlighting products for production, must be some very peculiar people living in their own bubble of delusional rot.

This camera is NOT aimed for video. Most Canon users are not interested in 4K, so this upgrade is logic I guess. Very basic upgrades saves more money to the Company.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 17:07 UTC
In reply to:

vermaden: Where is 4k?

1080p is enough for Canon users.

Link | Posted on Jun 29, 2017 at 16:59 UTC
On article Hands-on with the Canon EOS 77D (450 comments in total)
In reply to:

Michael Ma: Is this really a necessary camera? Just buy the 80D.

4K can also be seen as "30fps in 8mp jpeg" -mode.

Link | Posted on Feb 15, 2017 at 08:52 UTC
In reply to:

io_bg: They're trying not to cannibalize their FX DSLR sales so hard that they're cannibalizing their company as a whole.

The underlying element when it´s talk about cannibalizing - is fear.
The signum of Nikon and Canon the last 4-5 years.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 22:56 UTC
In reply to:

bokane: No concrete criticism other than: "DPAF isn't the kind of function that's necessarily going to grab the attention of a potential buyer. Like ā€“ say ā€“ 4K video might. Or a super high frame-rate mode, or slow-motion movie capture"

Most users, I imagine, are are not that concerned about the video specs. Basically a pointless article.

"Basically a pointless article." According to who? Are you God?

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 10:16 UTC
In reply to:

TORN: So Canon creates a mid level mirrorless that is powerful enough for most situations and actually pleasant to use with lenses that do not break the bank and many options if you are already invested into Canon and the only things which come to mind is "doesn't have 4K and isn't high end", really?

Where were the articles like Sony and its usability issues? Fuji and its Lightroom issues? Fuji are you crazy - 1700 for the X-T2? Max specs but overheating? How many tries does a company need to have a camera match its awesome specs in user experience?

I think many people miss the point with the M5 and just look for what it isn't. Canon is a conservative company with a DSLR line to protect. They do what they have to do which might not be to satisfy spec junkies with a side product in the middle of their lineup for a small and troublesome side market.

"Canon is a conservative company with a DSLR line to protect."

If we dig a little more deep, this protection is based on fear. Without fear, no protection. Canon is afraid.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 10:14 UTC
In reply to:

Tom Caldwell: 4K video, super high frame rate and slow motion movie are not very high on my needs agenda. I must be maturing.

What makes or breaks a camera for me is if it is actually nice to use. Sony can pack all the tech into a camera it chooses but until it makes a camera that I actually like using it is all uphill for my custom.

Maybe the M5 isn't too bad at all ....

For a photographer with very little need for video, this camera is probably a very nice option, yes. Has anyone claimed otherwise?

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 10:10 UTC
In reply to:

justmeMN: Barney, your rambling article is big disappointment.

JustmeMN. What is your very humble opinion about people here with no disappointment over the article?

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2016 at 16:40 UTC

Difficult not to agree.
If Canon is so innovativ and wants to be i the mirrorless front line, why ignore video? (High frame rates, 4K, log profiles, head phone jacket, zebra etc?)

Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2016 at 12:53 UTC as 328th comment

How difficult can it be to incorporate 1080p 120fps,15 fps burst shooting with continuous autofocus, or headphone jack? The dinosaur Samsung Nx1 had it two years ago.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 10:41 UTC as 10th comment | 6 replies

Shall be interesting to see if M5 can match the video quality of the 5 years old Nex-5n. I doubt it.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 21:51 UTC as 25th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

armandino: Of course no 4K. Could not have expected less from Canon. King of the crippling games.

I have both Canon and Sony (and Panasonic). Unfortunately many Canon lenses. But I save them, can be handy to have when Canon has catched up in 4-5 years.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 14:58 UTC
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1644 comments in total)
In reply to:

22codfish: So this is the camera for the wimps that complained about weight!

427 grams stripped compared to 1010 grams for a Pentax K-1 full frame. For about a pound more you get ten times the camera.

Who are "we"?

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 14:54 UTC
In reply to:

JBrown86: What a revolutionary idea and design Canon have come up with! I'm sure other manufactures with take note and soon follow suit. Watch out Sony, Fuji, Olympus....

Yeah, the other companies should remove 4k, slowmotion features etc to come down to the same level.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 09:02 UTC
In reply to:

armandino: Of course no 4K. Could not have expected less from Canon. King of the crippling games.

Even the lack of 1080p 120fps (or any slow motion feature?!) is a nice non-move forward.

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 09:00 UTC
On article Striding Forth: Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Review (2142 comments in total)

120fps in 720pā€¦.that´s wow.

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2016 at 10:47 UTC as 439th comment | 6 replies
On article Hasselblad to announce 'game changer' next week (454 comments in total)

Game changer in price: first prosumer-Hasselblad-camera that reaches the 100 000 US Dollar mark.

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2016 at 10:12 UTC as 112th comment
On article Samsung offers NX1 and NX500 firmware updates (150 comments in total)
In reply to:

PKDanny: Not out of business?

Has Samsung admitted that they are done with cameras?!

Link | Posted on May 18, 2016 at 08:19 UTC
Total: 209, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »