DocetLector

It`s not only the price you have to pay but also the increase of size and weight because of the heat problems.

Another videocentric camera?

Which "full format" camera has better IBIS than X-T4?

Built in ND filters not possible in system cameras

Aperture rings with marks on all Xf lenses

I bougt the 16-80 last November with firmware 1.02 and could not see shuttershock in MS.

The very best of luck to you!

No one using this lens?

Why is flash phtography (social) only "okay" ? I though flash photography is one of the strenghts of this camera because of the leaf shutter.

To digitalize some hundred old and very old Images I recently got from relatives I bought this lens. It is a 1:1 macro. As I am usually not doing macro so I did not want to spend too much money. It ...

The review of the X-T4 is out here on DPREVIEW since yesterday and until now I have not seen any feedback here in this forum. A bit strange or did I miss something?

The point is - you said you wanted to achieve a "filmlike" soft grainy  image. The Image in my last post which was taken with film is sharp and has no grainy soft filmlike look at all. If you want ...

I won`t have a discussion about taste but what you say about film and grain is just not correct. I have been doing portrait work semi professionally (photography was not my main job but I got paid ...

I could not disagree more about the 60 f2.4. To me it is one of the finest lens for portrait work. The only disadvantage is the poor autofocus of this lens.

Come on,                                                                                                                                     using f 1.8 will give you more OOF area and a little ...

If it was your Intention to achieve a "dreamy" look like you say how do you create that look with a sharp lens? You can either use vaseline on your front lens, a soft filter like the Zeiss Softar`s ...

Image 1 and 2 are much sharper than 3 and esp. 4 and according to the exif`s the SS was 1/30 resp. 1/40 sec which is far too low for a 85 mm lens if you had not used a tripod. Motion blur was not ...

This lens renders quite nicely for it`s price but with sharpness it is far behind the 90 f2 or even the 60 f2.4. The image Nr 3 and even more the Nr 4 are suffering from motion blur because of low ...

You are correct if you use only one focal lenght.                                                                    But it doesn`t make a difference  using a defined FL with a zoom or a prime lens. ...

A flatter rendition because zooms are usually not as fast as fast primes - but why a better perspective?