Vladimir2K

Diagnosing a G9 Issue = it is too big

Thank you guys for bringing me down to earth ! I see i already have got a very capable system now.

Thanks, sure this kind of reply helps a lot.

Hi. No humor here. Serious question, but after seeing those replies i understand i am just too poor for good FF kit. I mainly shoot wildlife, 300+ focal lenght mft.

So i really like M43, cameras are fast and light...but *I sometimes hate that ISO performance *Low light situations when animals are most active are bad, also fast teles will cost you a kidney. *Dy ...

Those modes are soooooo soft. Image is toooooooooo unsharp compared to actual high res sensor.

Pretty bad quality  i must say

I mean those are good images, i like them too ! Just i do not see the logic about this comment: These G9 images are setting a pretty high bar for the OM1. Because they are not all perfectly sharp, ...

That is the biggest BS i have read a long time. What part in this picture matches the 40-150 2,8 ?

Sorry. Did not want to sound rude. Just most of here are after perfect sharpness. Pics are good of course.

Is it not ? Well in that case they are all good. If i look around in this forum it gives me an idea that sharpness is the first priority.

I am sorry but some of them are missing critical focus, or is it the motion blur. They are OK- First is sharp. Second is a bit misfocused i guess. Third the focus is on tail and image looks too ...

Wait, they still dont have the in camera panorama ? wow.

Cheaper

It looks like a video.