bufo vulgaris

bufo vulgaris

Joined on Oct 24, 2019

bufo vulgaris' recent activity

  • Nielk,

    "the correct exposure in that case is f2/1/125/ISO6400. That would be the same for FF, APS-C and M43, right?"

    Yes, all those settings will be right. But of course they will not result in...

  • If You think in terms of equivalence, it's unfair to compare image noise between different formats using the same ISO. Yes, we rightly bash people who believes that f4 on M43 behaves as f4 on FF,...

  • No, I am still using use the original OMD e-M5... I see no reason to go to medium format. Most M43-users don't understand that it isn't exposure (light gatrering per surface unit) that is...

  • Yes, the end for You. But not for the rest of us because we understand that neither image noise and depth of field will be the same.

  • Lotus cat.. You haven't understood the subject at all.

  • I'm not gonna point out that f2.8 is 5.6, but I AM going to point out that You are comparing apples and oranges. Why compare with a 24-70/2.8? Why not compare it to, say, the sony FE 24-70/4? It is...

  • Long time ago I was a FF Canon user, but a problem the Canon aftersales couldn't solve made me temporarily cameraless. As a remedy I bought the original E-M5 with a Pana-Leica 25/1.4, just to have...

Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
bufo vulgaris has not added any gear yet.
Total messages 0
Threads started 0
Total comments 44
Total likes 214
Last post 7 months ago
Total reviews 0
Entries 0
Votes cast 0
Photos uploaded 0