Osvaldo Cristo

Osvaldo Cristo

Lives in Brazil Itapevi, SP, Brazil
Works as a Engineer
Joined on Oct 22, 2002


Total: 139, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Murat Sahan: I dont know about you guys but Im saving for the 18-50. And if it works with my old SB-400 I´ll be even happier. I long ago gave up the APS-C because of size. I have the past 2 years shoot with an olympus XZ-1 which has served me well but quite often I wanted a wider angel. In fact, the only lens i saved when I sold my camera was the sigma 10-20 mm lens. Now I will happily sell it for a 100 euros and use the money on the new DL. Bravo Nikon.

According to nikonusa site, your SB-400 and my SB-300 will work with those cameras.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 19:56 UTC
In reply to:

Sonyshine: I think these cameras just illustrate how confused Nikon is and how it confuses its customers too.

Why three cameras? Hoping 1 out of 3 will be a hit?

Why are none truly pocketable like the RX100?

If Nikon is going to copy the RX100 at least include a built in EVF!

What does it say about Nikon 1 cameras? Why is a J5 with kit lens cheaper than any of these ?

Why high spec fast lenses here and slower lenses for 1 system?

Sorry Nikon. You are just muddling along without any clear direction - AGAIN!

Simply different people has different tastes.

The WA camera version has no appeal to me... The superzomm is yet worse for me... But they are the great tool for a lot of people.

I like the 24-85 version. They surprised myself as I did not expect such well ballanced P&S. I am seriously considerring to buy it to use in my business travels.

Very well done, Nikon!

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 19:48 UTC
In reply to:

Digital Suicide: I do like the look of 15-50 and 24-85. They look sexy, much like LX100. And there is no problem to screw on polarizer or Nd filter, which you can't do with Sony RX100.

DL24-85 with electronic shutter going up to 1/16,000 second in the practice will not need an embedded ND filter (usually 3 f-stop).

Well done, Nikon.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2016 at 19:15 UTC
On article The long, difficult road to Pentax full-frame (609 comments in total)

I had forgotten some of the facts DPR brought in that article, but I remind most of them.

Although I like some of the ideas from Pentax and their general camera design I cannot understand why people could put his/her money on Pentax stuff. The company´s track is extremely erratic and IMO it isn´t worth the risk - mainly if you depend from them to bring your daily butter and bread.

It can explain their lower entry price: they are buying market. It is a pity, because it could be different... at that price it will be more difficult to create a decent customer´s support, to get money to R&D and to return something attractive to the investors.

Anyway I desire good luck to them.

Link | Posted on Feb 19, 2016 at 17:19 UTC as 100th comment | 1 reply
On article Sigma 20mm F1.4 'Art' lens real-world sample gallery (137 comments in total)
In reply to:

Greg VdB: For people interested in how the lens deals with coma in starscapes, Lenstip has a special part on that in their review:
(the uncropped images can be found in the "sample shots" page)
It's pretty bad wide open on FF, as with all fast wide lenses, but improves quickly on stopping down.

Thanks. It is good to know that lens isn´t for me... comma looks so bad as in my Sigma 20 f/1.8, unfortunately. :-(

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2016 at 18:17 UTC

Really? Personally I never had problems to choose my next camera and never had any buyer remorse (yet!).

You just need to take some time to make your homework: Internet research and User´s Manual download and read and preferably study such material.

Perhaps the biggest problem is to get the technical background to clearly state your objectives and to understand the (always present) compromises you assume in your choice. Any choice.

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 17:36 UTC as 138th comment | 1 reply
On article A classic reinvented? Domke Chronicle Review (122 comments in total)

If you are interested in that bag I strongly recommend you also consider Domke F-2... it is USD 90 in the USA and without the bad taste "color detail"...

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2016 at 13:45 UTC as 40th comment | 2 replies
On article Fujifilm announces development of EF-X500 flash (86 comments in total)

2003 Nikon SB-800 now with a Fuji wrapping... thirteen years after that... and people says this is an innovative industry...

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2016 at 02:41 UTC as 8th comment
On article Nikon fills in the blanks on professional grade D5 DSLR (550 comments in total)
In reply to:

Trubbtele: Sell all crap and buy D5 & D500, be happy for a long time :-)

...or be happy up to the next camera release... :-)

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 20:16 UTC

Let me see: Nikon 300 f/4 PF ED VR is 755 grams at USD 2,000 (in the USA) and the newer Olympus 300 f/4 IS is 1,270 grams at USD 2,500...

I think the price for this new Olympus lens ins´t bad as you consider their production volume is probably lower than Nikon´s lens, but I cannot understand its weight, almost the double of Nikon´s... It was supposed their light weight solution would have lighter lenses (than Nikon FX)...

Anyway I do not have to understand anything about Olympus... I was just wandering...

Link | Posted on Jan 6, 2016 at 20:12 UTC as 15th comment | 3 replies

I think D750 is the best bang for your money currently, although I preferred D810 to replace my old D300S as the handling and feel were very similar.

But if I was going from D7xxx, D5xxx, Dxx cameras, certainly I would go to D750.

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2015 at 20:08 UTC as 20th comment
On article In Fine Detail: Canon EOS 5DS / 5DS R In-Depth Review (739 comments in total)
In reply to:

sneakyracer: I am a Professional Photographer and besides quite a few of the reasons already mentioned in this thread I keep using Canon because it saves me time. With the Canon's I do not need to remove dust spots. Canon quietly solved that issue with the 5D3 and it is an unsung feature but one that saves a huge amount of time.

Maybe Sony solved it in the A7RII but at least on the D810, sensor dust is always an issue.

"Maybe Sony solved it in the A7RII but at least on the D810, sensor dust is always an issue."

No - it is not ALWAYS an issue.

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2015 at 23:00 UTC
On article Nikon D810 firmware C 1.10 now available (62 comments in total)

At the moment you find a bug in a piece of equipment you got your proof it isn´t bug free BUT it is impossible to prove any piece of equipment is really bug free.

I see an evidence of good work from Nikon to test their new product the fact all bug fixes announced above doesn´t appear as customer´s complains, at last in dpreview... From my side even after almost 30,000 shots I did not remember to face any of the "bugs" now fixed by this update.

Actually, to offer a bug fix for problems people aren´t complaining looks me an act of courageous. I applaud Nikon or any other manufacturer that act this way.

Link | Posted on Oct 30, 2015 at 20:51 UTC as 5th comment

Very cool! Amazing!

Link | Posted on Oct 28, 2015 at 12:06 UTC as 7th comment
On article JPEG Committee contemplates adding DRM to image format (186 comments in total)

Oh no! I saw that before! Apparently they doesn´t know the nightmare it brought to video, audio and e-book markets...

Complete waste of time and other resources IMHO.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2015 at 07:15 UTC as 16th comment

It must be much, much better than their legacy 20 f/1.8 that is useless bellow f/4 (in full frame) for its absurd sagittal astigmatism and coma, particularly visible in astrophotography but it will be there for any kind of photography, of course.

If that lens really could be used at f/1.4 with acceptable sharpness at full frame and controlled optics distortions, I am sure they would have a winner.

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2015 at 07:11 UTC as 11th comment | 1 reply
On article Airnef brings desktop Wi-Fi transfer to Nikon users (36 comments in total)

Thanks for share. Interesting although I do not use wifi in my cameras.

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2015 at 22:22 UTC as 23rd comment

OMG! Well, I think there is a market for anything...

Link | Posted on Sep 17, 2015 at 22:17 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

Augusto F S: This lens, Nikon AF-S 200-500mm f5.6E ED VR, does not come with crystal nano cover (2006 technology), but comes with integrated super cover (1970 technology). Could explain me why this regression? How is the correction of shadows and ghosts without coverage nano crystal instead of the old thecnologie (SIC)?

You get you pay for... how much do you think people want pay for it?

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2015 at 21:38 UTC
On article Sony reportedly shifting focus to full-frame cameras (447 comments in total)

They are focusing on 3k+ cameras and 2k+ lenses where the real money is (following Canon and Nikon). Companies are learning profitability can be more important than sales volume... It looks they can miss the lower end segment is a significant drive for the higher one. Well, let us see. Interesting future for the Photography stuff industry.

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2015 at 12:32 UTC as 7th comment | 1 reply
Total: 139, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »