Terry M

Terry M

Lives in United States Savannah, GA, United States
Works as a Technology coordinator at Savannah State
Joined on Feb 19, 2001
About me:

Digital shooter since 1998.


Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14
On article New kid on the block: YI M1 review (699 comments in total)
In reply to:

Terry M: I wonder if the lenses are any good.

That's the one that caught my eye. Makes me wonder how it would work on a M43 camera from another manufacturer.

Link | Posted on Nov 30, 2016 at 03:46 UTC
On article New kid on the block: YI M1 review (699 comments in total)

I wonder if the lenses are any good.

Link | Posted on Nov 29, 2016 at 21:29 UTC as 66th comment | 2 replies
On article Throwback Thursday: Canon EOS D30 (132 comments in total)

I bought one secondhand in 2002-03 and years later the color of those files and the character of the images are my favorite of any Canon DSLR. I've owned or shot with the 30D, 60D and 70D, but the D30 is still a great camera.

Link | Posted on Oct 9, 2016 at 01:05 UTC as 14th comment
On article Canon EOS M5: What you need to know (564 comments in total)

This a nice-looking, decently specified camera — that I wish Canon had offered three years ago! I'm interested, true, but I'd be MUCH more excited if they produced a X100-style version of their Canonet.

Link | Posted on Sep 16, 2016 at 14:19 UTC as 108th comment | 1 reply

As far as classic film bodies that need to be "digitalized," I can't imagine how much money Canon's left on the table by not coming out with a proper digital version of their Canonets. Compact. Good, fast lenses. I covet my father's, but I wish I had a digital version of my own.

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2016 at 22:17 UTC as 70th comment

The digital Stylus cameras never matched the simple charms of their analog forefathers. Loved my Stylus Epic. Still have it. Took some of my all-time favorite photos with it. Gosh, I think there's a roll of film inside with a few unexposed frames on it!

Link | Posted on Aug 18, 2016 at 22:14 UTC as 72nd comment

Another fantastic video from you guys. I thought the Alaska one was my favorite but this one is right there alongside it.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2016 at 21:02 UTC as 42nd comment
On article Upwardly mobile: Sony a6300 Review (2157 comments in total)
In reply to:

l_d_allan: Wow, that was a fast, timely review of a recently announced camera. I can't recall a DPR full review being available so quickly after it was announced.

A nice feature that I don't think DPR mentioned: according to Bill Claff's Photons-to-photos website, the a6300 has the "Aptina Dual Base ISO" circuitry like the a7Rii (except 100/400 instead of 100/640)

Yeah, funny how quickly they can produce a review when they want to.
— Signed, Dozens of cameras from other manufacturers DPReview has pretended don't even exist.

Link | Posted on Apr 7, 2016 at 13:28 UTC
On article Field Test: The Sony Cyber-shot RX100 IV in Mexico (135 comments in total)

These videos are getting better and better. And the underwater footage from the Mark IV looks amazing.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2016 at 17:28 UTC as 10th comment

One thing that people who say, "I never _________" (usually "shoot video") don't consider is that even if you never or even rarely use a certain feature of a camera, you want it to be a good implantation of it if you ever DO need to use it.

I don't shoot a lot of video but if I'm ever asked to, I want to have a camera that CAN shoot video and will shoot GOOD QUALITY.

I wonder if these same people are okay using Picasa because they "never" use most of the features in Photoshop or Lightroom?

Link | Posted on Jan 22, 2016 at 16:44 UTC as 149th comment | 1 reply
On article Hands-on with the Fujifilm X70 (263 comments in total)

I keep telling myself that Fuji is making the camera I'm looking for (a digital Canonet), but US$800 for a camera without a viewfinder? That's going to be a tough sell.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2016 at 16:03 UTC as 52nd comment | 1 reply
On article Canon EOS M3 real-world samples (147 comments in total)

Soft, noisy and poor color. What gives?

Link | Posted on Sep 10, 2015 at 21:15 UTC as 61st comment
On article CP+ 2013: Interview with Canon's Masaya Maeda (490 comments in total)

As a longtime Canon user, these comments are very discouraging. Canon is like the tail trying to wag the dog (the market) and it's just not working. The EOS M is a flawed product and for Canon to base any type of market strategy on its sales is equally flawed.

The low-end of the point-and-shoot market will succumb to smartphones, but big-sensor compacts have a lot of life left in them. As long as they aren't slow as molasses. As long as they aren't as big as entry-level SLRs.

Like Vartkes, I have a Sony RX100 (I passed on the M and the G1 X) and it's a marvel. The last time I even touched my Canon SLRs was to make sure they were secure in the camera bags I'd placed them in before putting them in my closet.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2013 at 21:07 UTC as 59th comment
On article Canon EOS M hands-on preview (564 comments in total)
In reply to:

looker: And by "mirrorless", you mean point and shoot? I'm scanning through pages and pages here on DP, trying to find out what the difference between "mirrorless" and point and shoot is. Apparently, just a psychological marketing distinction based on a premium price.

The biggest differences are sensor size and the ability to switch lenses. The controls can be very P&S-like, but in my experience, the sensor makes for notable improvements in image quality, especially in low light.

Link | Posted on Jul 25, 2012 at 19:31 UTC
Total: 14, showing: 1 – 14