Lives in Canada Mississauga, Canada
Joined on Sep 6, 2004


Total: 97, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article RIP Lightroom 6: Death by subscription model (1633 comments in total)

I'm glad I've never wasted time or money on Lightroom. I have only used Capture One Pro. I bought version 7 it in 2014 and upgraded to version 9 in 2016. It is very expensive though, so better to wait until newest version is about to release so current version gets discounted half-price. I paid $149.50 USD for 7, and $49.00 USD to upgrade to 9.

Perhaps there are legit reasons Adobe dominates the industry. But I'm just an enthusiast, I can settle for Phase One products instead.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2017 at 21:07 UTC as 121st comment

Some strong and polarized reactions here. That is the mark of an interesting photo.

Weddings and wedding photos all look the same, so it's good that photographer and couple were willing to try something different at least, even if it's probably not something I would have done.

Making a photograph, not just capturing a photograph. Something I need to think more about myself.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2017 at 15:22 UTC as 12th comment | 1 reply
On article 2016 DPReview Readers' Best Shots: Things (67 comments in total)

4 is very dramatic. 5 is like two different worlds. Almost symmetry from asymmetry. Very inspiring.

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2017 at 21:05 UTC as 4th comment
On article Ultimate OM-D: Olympus E-M1 Mark II Review (1397 comments in total)
In reply to:

Geodesiq: The price is absurd. You can get similar IQ with the Lumix GX8 which is going for $650. on ebay. You get better IQ with the Sony a6500 @$1400., you get much better IQ with the Sony a7II @$1750.

Even $650 is way overpriced considering the tiny sensor of 4/3rds. For $650 people are much better off getting a camera with APS-C sensor. m4/3 is just a waste of money no matter the camera.

Link | Posted on Nov 24, 2016 at 01:09 UTC

This article is disturbing but hilarious at the same time. It reads like something from The Onion, like a satire of corporate overreach or something. Not only taking and selling thousands of public domain images without the photographer's permission and without giving either credit or compensation to her, but also threatening her and trying make her pay for posting her own public domain images on her own website. Very weird but unfortunately this the new normal. Public domain has increasingly become the corporate domain. This is something the people of the USA should keep in mind if they are thinking of voting for that corporate puppet Hillary Clinton in the upcoming presidential election.

Link | Posted on Jul 30, 2016 at 04:12 UTC as 19th comment | 3 replies
On photo Trees in the Mist in the Why shoot film. challenge (12 comments in total)

Amazing photo...

Link | Posted on May 27, 2016 at 00:51 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On article Readers' Showcase: Tom Goodman (91 comments in total)

Very inspiring photos. I haven't done any photography in over a year but seeing these makes me feel like picking up my camera again.

Link | Posted on Nov 23, 2015 at 03:38 UTC as 31st comment
On article Readers' Showcase: Documentary and Street photography (108 comments in total)

Damn, a lot of these photos are amazing. Hard to choose a favourite, just great photos all around, especially 1, 5-9, 11, 13. I am jealous because I can't do these kind of photos, I am too shy, lol.

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2014 at 17:25 UTC as 25th comment
On article Portfolio: Photography student Luke Evans (157 comments in total)

Those faux landscapes are so cool. I experimented myself in the past to do these fake landscapes, but arguably less successfully. I think these photos really are a good example of how photographers "make photos" rather than merely "take photos". It's something I've always thought about for my photos, or at least tried to.

Link | Posted on May 27, 2014 at 00:38 UTC as 32nd comment | 1 reply
On article Zeiss announces 'no compromise' Otus 55mm F1.4 (488 comments in total)

Apparently size, weight, price and lack of autofocus are not compromises.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2013 at 15:25 UTC as 12th comment | 6 replies

I like impressionist techniques in photography. I enjoy the vague, dreamlike quality of these photos. I have seen other photography of this type and I have tried to do something similar for my own photos in the past, using various techniques, without much success, tbh. I think motion blur in particular is a underutilized element in photography. It is something I will make an effort to experiment more with for my future photos.

Link | Posted on Aug 21, 2013 at 19:10 UTC as 46th comment

These pictures remind me of my own parents, before they separated when I was a kid.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2013 at 01:31 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply
On photo Hidden Nightmare in the Hidden monsters challenge (16 comments in total)


Link | Posted on Sep 18, 2012 at 21:27 UTC as 4th comment
On article Exhibition Review: 8x10 By Impossible (85 comments in total)

Interesting article, beautiful photos. Somehow I guessed just from reading the headline that the gearheads would be upset by this article and make negative comments and childish insults, and I was not wrong.

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2012 at 19:35 UTC as 8th comment
On photo Home? in the Hard times on the street (READ THE RULES) challenge (34 comments in total)

jorepuusa wrote:
> It is possible that he has family, kids, wife, brother, sister etc.
> What rights do we have to show his state to all the world.
> As a photojournalist I call this -social pornography- at it´s worst.
> We live in a world where rags seem to be considered as photogenic.
> Sad, cause someone is going to feel very bad about this picture and all the rest in this challenge.
> Is that the meaning of photography? To use someone, who has lost everything?

I agree. Instead of photographing homeless people, it is better for photographers to ignore homeless people and pretend that they don't exist, just like rest of the population already do.

Link | Posted on Mar 15, 2011 at 22:17 UTC as 15th comment
On photo It's all over. in the Lithium challenge (7 comments in total)

RickBuddy wrote:
> > 2RickBuddy:
> > Get real. Do not slip into over-moralistic levels. Anyway, your opinion is your opinion, thanks. And your judgement driven by prejudice and anger does not insult me, really. I wish you a good luck.
> >
> It is not over-moral to point out that an insensitive hack reveals a stereotypical stigma of the disease.
> Nor is it over-moral to point out that these stigmas make life immensely more difficult for those who suffer from bi-polar condition, and serve as a barrier to treatment.
> I lost a job because the stigma over my bi-polar condition. Your portrayal of the condition reflects a few of the nasty prejudices that people hold against manic-depressives. I know the consequences of your ignorance. No. No. No. I am not over-moralizing.
> I'm just pointing out a prejudiced, ignorant lout who doesn't care what people who suffer feel.
> I have a great job now in the creative arts, make really good money, have a great counselor, have a wonderful support network.
> Try sometime to see the beauty and majesty of the impact of those who not only suffer — but also harness the power of the bi-polar condition: John F. Kennedy, Winston Churchill, Abraham Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Florence Nightingale, Ludwig van Beethoven, Alexander the Great, (Here's a link:
> Will you ever match that greatness?
> And what do you do? You put them at the end of a rope and call it art.

Yes, admitting that you are manic-depressive and then simultaneously launching into a lengthy and hostile barrage of knee-jerk condemnations, insults and name-callings of some guy on the internet you don't even know will make people think of manic-depressives more kindly, and erase the damage done by this challenge entry to the image of mentally-ill people. Great strategy.


Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2010 at 11:35 UTC as 1st comment
On photo Mrs. Gonzales in the ~ S h e ~ challenge (15 comments in total)

007peter wrote:
> I see, voted yourself 5 times with 5 different account. Here we go again :-( So sad

Indeed, here we go again. If anything is sad, it is amount of ignorance of this thread and the amount of suspicion directed toward this entry, or any entry that garners high votes (or low votes for that matter).

Perhaps the low and high scores should be disabled altogether. Make it a range from 2.0 to 3.5 stars instead. And automatically ban any member who has an entry where the votes are not a perfect normal distribution. There should never be any diverging opinions about a photo, there should always be somewhat of a consensus.


Link | Posted on Aug 3, 2010 at 11:02 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo Sun rise 5-30-10 002-1 in the The Garden challenge (5 comments in total)

scooper1 wrote:
> Try using a saturation setting something a bit lower than +20 and see how much more natural the photo looks. Personally I'm tired of seeing grossly oversaturated images in these Challenges, and have difficultly understanding why so many people score them highly.

"Natural" is not always better.


Link | Posted on Jul 26, 2010 at 12:45 UTC as 3rd comment
On photo Surreal View in the > Wonderland challenge (1 comment in total)

At first glance, it looks like a world that suddenly ends, as if it is on flat disc instead of an oblate sphere...

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2010 at 02:17 UTC as 1st comment
On photo What's behind the Secret Door? in the > Wonderland challenge (1 comment in total)

Looks like a scene out of Lord of the Rings or something...

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2010 at 02:13 UTC as 1st comment
Total: 97, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »