Lives in United States Northern, United States
Joined on May 10, 2003
About me:

Nikon D810,D800E,D800
Canon 1DM3, Olympus EM5,EM1
Lots and lots of lenses


Total: 119, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to: Looks dangerous. Worth the risk for a photo?

Pair of cerebral lobes?

Link | Posted on Oct 21, 2016 at 17:20 UTC

Looks dangerous. Worth the risk for a photo?

Link | Posted on Oct 20, 2016 at 12:22 UTC as 34th comment | 2 replies

How much "breathing"?

Link | Posted on Oct 19, 2016 at 12:46 UTC as 54th comment | 8 replies

Beautiful and very high resolution and nothing I would be interested it.

Link | Posted on Oct 3, 2016 at 22:52 UTC as 50th comment
On article Behind the Shot: The Shadow Towers (68 comments in total)

Beautiful scenery but somewhat lifeless images, flat and unengaging. The quality of the light I suppose.

Link | Posted on Oct 2, 2016 at 22:34 UTC as 12th comment

Very interesting! The future is coming whether we like it or not. Imagine the world when we can control machines with our thoughts.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2016 at 11:56 UTC as 8th comment | 1 reply
On article iPhone 7 Plus real-world sample gallery (288 comments in total)

It does a nice job for most situations; certainly not a high ISO champ but that was not expected. I use my iPhone as a camera more and more, actually.

Link | Posted on Oct 1, 2016 at 11:04 UTC as 28th comment

I wish Fuji well. I believe this will be an excellent camera, but it is entering a crowded market.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 17:26 UTC as 27th comment | 6 replies

Have been down the medium format road, not going there again. FF DSLRs are great for me. Medium Format is expensive and limiting: size, weight, limited slow lenses, limited accessories, bigger tripod. With the DSLR and Mirrorless bodies we have now very few people will need a medium format system, in my opinion.
Hasselblad, Phase I, Fuji, Pentax? There will be some fall out.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 12:29 UTC as 126th comment | 12 replies
On article 6K here we come: Here's the new Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH5 (167 comments in total)

6K? I guess you can never have too much quality. I haven't filled out my 4K video collection yet.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 12:41 UTC as 58th comment | 1 reply
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85/G80 First Impressions Review (228 comments in total)

Makes the Olympus 5D II seem a bit overpriced!

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 11:32 UTC as 77th comment | 4 replies

Interesting decisions by Canon.
It's big. Why not give us a mirrorless camera the uses the EOS lenses?
What are the mirrorless advantages?
Precision focus on still targets
Smaller size camera and lenses
If we're not getting a much smaller, lighter camera, why not go full frame EOS and let us use Canon's jewels (which we already own)?

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2016 at 10:46 UTC as 153rd comment | 4 replies
On article ESPN publishes iPhone 7 Plus photos from US Open (359 comments in total)

Cell phone or 1DX2? These images look great!

Link | Posted on Sep 13, 2016 at 12:29 UTC as 53rd comment | 2 replies
On article Apple unveils iPhone 7 and dual-cam iPhone 7 Plus (940 comments in total)

The evolution of the camera-phone-computer continues..
What a great time to be a photographer.

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2016 at 22:01 UTC as 154th comment

One wonders how studies like this cause us to change what we do so we don't look depressed; no more inkwell for example.

Link | Posted on Aug 19, 2016 at 12:21 UTC as 12th comment
On article Photoshop CC 2015.5.1 available (89 comments in total)

Don't like the subscription model either but it's what they have to do to stay in business. I think we'll see more and more of this due to market saturation and product maturation. PS is still excellent and the reference point for post processing software. I don't think any of us wants Adobe to go out of business.

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2016 at 11:46 UTC as 11th comment | 2 replies

Well, that's a lot of gear, but image how much the thieves have amassed by now!

Link | Posted on Aug 7, 2016 at 21:05 UTC as 18th comment | 1 reply

What if you have an eye tic????????????

Link | Posted on Jul 24, 2016 at 21:14 UTC as 15th comment | 1 reply
On article 2016 iPhone Photography Award winners announced (76 comments in total)

As with any camera, good light, composition, timing and technique lead to a good photography.

Link | Posted on Jul 12, 2016 at 22:28 UTC as 7th comment
On article Photographing fireworks: The basics and then some (67 comments in total)
In reply to:

Irakly Shanidze: Simply "moving away" is not going to produce adequate results in getting city skyline, just like in the example here. The idea here is to get the skyline exposed well enough to get at least 1/3 of the attention, giving the rest two thirds to the fireworks.

The trick is to expose it for long enough to make the sky blue. Do not worry about overexposure, as the fireworks are moving, and all you get is longer traces. What you get in return is perfectly exposed fireworks and the city skyline against the lighter toned sky. Below is the example.

Absolutely wrong. You get way overexposed fireworks. The finale lights up the city like daylight. The problem with this advice is it assumes one rocket is going up at at time; that is not the case with modern professional displays. Many rockets go up and it's way too bright for the suggested approach.

Link | Posted on Jul 5, 2016 at 19:39 UTC
Total: 119, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »