Valdai21

They don't have much in common. Rendering is different. 35mm f/2 is sharper and more clinical. 18mm f/2 is closer to the 35mm f/1,4.

There are quite a lot of lenses for Sony FE. Canon R system is much newer. What lenses do you need ? Can you wait for them if they don't exist now ? Are you ok with adapting Canon E mount glass on ...

I love manual focus lenses but I find them much easier to use on mirrorless than on DSLRs. That's why I finally picked some AF lenses for my DF. Plus manual focus lenses are heavier than their ...

Thank you. I own some lenses they tested and I think their comparisons are relevant.

There is no bad choice. The 35 f/1,4 has more magic than the 23 f/1,4 and it's cheaper, but the 23mm is a more useful focal lenght in my opinion. Plus the bokeh difference between both 23mm wide ...

18-23 are close, 23-35 less so but still why not 18-35 ? 18mm f/2 is Fuji's worst prime for edge and corner sharpness but it does not really matter for reportage. It's small and has a nice rendering. ...

Sony 16-50 is a poor lens, huge distorsion. I think for this budget the best you can get is in micro 4/3. Camera body: E-M10, E-M5, E-P5, GM1, GF7, GX7... + 12/32mm + 35-100mm + 25mm f/1,8 or 45mm ...

Don't buy Samsung, it's an obsolete system.

Depends if you take a lot of pictures or not and if you change your camera regularly or not. I own several cameras and shoot about 3000 pictures a year, I keep about half of them. I first was ...

I would recommend you to have a look at micro 4/3 system. Most lenses are small and quite affordable and lenses do matter more than the camera in the possibilities you'll get and in the final ...

I always have a lenspen with me, it's not expensive, it works well and it last quite long. After a few uses, the brush can get oily so I almost never use it except on filters. I blow dust first, ...

Thank you for the review. I like your sample pictures, great colors. This lens seems interesting, unfortunately it's not easy to find one unless you order from HK and are lucky enough to get a good ...

Just try both before choosing. Ergonomics are quite different. Also keep in mind that except some Sigmas, there are not much APS-C lenses for Sony. Of course you can use the A6600 with full frame ...

Didn't think about this one but it may be the right for you. It's an excellent lens. Samyang's housing doesn't look the best but these are solid and focusing is smooth.

Only you can decide. 16mm f/1,4 is a bit bigger than the 23mm. May be a hair better but they are both excellent. 23mm f/1,4 is more versatile. There is no bad choice...

It's true that Fuji's files are a bit special. You should learn how to post process them. However they are a lot of landscapes photographers with Fuji gear. Fuji's accentuation can look a bit ...

I think micro 4/3 is the only option if you want a camera with interchangeable lenses, not too heavy and a birding lens that is not crazy expensive. The 75-300 is not very bright but it's a good ...

I own the A7 v1 and while it has some limitations, it gives good results at standard isos values if you don't need fast autofocus. The II is the same with stabilisation, the III seems really nice. ...

Yes but the distance scale is not very accurate. Feeling is a bit better than a regular focusing ring on an autofocus lens but it's not as nice as a real manual focus lens. It turns a bit too ...

I own the 50mm f/2 since 2 years and gave a try to the Viltrox. I used it about an hour before sending it back. I may have been unlucky with my sample but here is my experience. Sharpness: The Fuji ...