ddc2020

I wonder how it performs against Lightroom?  May also git it a try if the adobe pricing keeps rising. How do you like the Z6 ii with 24-70 F4? Just ordered one myself a few days ago and look ...

Indeed, the F1.4 is heavy, plus 650 grams. But super images

I don’t have the Sigma 24 mm 1.4 and after finetuning with the sigma dock it’s gives great results. Focus is on and images are sharp. Great lens.

Hi I have the Tamron 15-30 f2,8 G2 and that is super sharp. It's as sharp as many primes. Downside it's heavy and you need an adapter to use filters. But I love the outcome when I see these super ...

Hi, I have the Tamron 100-400 and I love it. It's super sharp, great focussing and gives very good results in combination with my D500 as well as with D750. Same for the other Tamrons I have such ...

I have both D750 and D500 and my idea was to use the FF for landscape and portrait en D500 for action and wildlife.  Turns out that I now also use the D500 for landscape and the results are ...

Of the ones I own and use, I prefer the Tamron 35 mm 1.8 which I use as walk around lens on my D750 and the Nikon 85 mm 1.8 for portrait. Tack sharp both!

I don’t have the Tamron 1.4 but the 1.8 is on of my best lenses. Super Sharp, VC so you can shoot at 1/10 and still have good IQ. It’s also 400g lighter than the 1.4 which is nice advantage when ...

I think it’s worth it. I bought a Sigma 24mm 1.4 which needed some focus adjustment. Now it is tack on sharp on every distance. I also have the Tamron dock and there as well calibration helps. in ...

I have Benro and NiSi to be used with a NiSi 150 mm holder on my Tamron 15-30 f2,8 G2. The Benro's are a GND (gradual neutral density) of 2 stops and a ND os 4 stop.  I found the results quite ...

Seems we are on the same line.  70-210 is more walk around either in combination with a 35 1,8 prime or 15-30 2,8 G like on my last trip to Lake Como when I used this for the day trips.  When ...

Interesting to see we have similar gear: Sigma 24 mm 1.4, Tamron 35 1.8, Tamron 70-210 f4 and Tamron 100-400. I am happy with al of these. I do sometimes feel the 70-210 and 100-400 are to much in ...

You may also look ar 24 mm, which is 36mm equivalent on 35 mm camera, my favorite for walk around.  I personally have the Sigma 24 mm 1,4 and it gives great IQ.  I bought it in combo with Sigma ...

the reason I went for the G2 was the VC or VR.  If don't need it and to be honest I also mostly use it with tripod,  you might just as well go for the G1 and save the money for a next one...

I have the Tamron 15-30 2,8 G2 and love the lens.  It's quite heavy, but it delivers super image quality and has VC (stabilization), meaning you can easily use it indoor without tripod. Best regards ...

Hi, what card are you using? I have a similar issue with 2 Sandisk Extreme PRO 170Mb/s 64GB SD cards. Sometimes it works, but often it downloadds and when I want to look at them via LR or finder, I ...

I used to have the Sigma 17-50 2.8 on my D5600 and it was on there 90% of the time. Great IQ and good in low light. I sold it when I bought my D750 and with it FX lenses. Now recently bought a ...

I got my D500 last week.  Unfortunately it's been very cloudy and dark since, so have not been able to test it on birds without going into +10000 ISO and am I not so happy with the results yet. I ...

Nice pictures, I also have a 100-400 mm and love it.  I am also looking to go for a D500, so like to see this and get field feedback. I do have one question though: you mention 100-400 vs 150-600 ...

Nice. I actually have a D750 and was considering a 2nd body which I could also use for wildlife. So either get extender or larger tele or a D500 to use with my Tamron 100-400 G2, which I love. ...