MXC

Joined on Jan 29, 2015

Comments

Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
In reply to:

Franz Weber: Nothing what a RX10 IV could not do.

You meant Android

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2019 at 03:43 UTC
In reply to:

Terrible Photographer: Tumblr still exists?

Have you been living under a rock?

Link | Posted on Dec 5, 2018 at 01:42 UTC
In reply to:

Foveonite: Note the difference.
The wall plug continuOUSly supplies electricity to the device.
The sun continuALly rises from the East.

"they're excellent value for money." I think "they've excellent value for money" is better.
majority shareholder -> major shareholder. (majority can't be a noun-adjective).

Your wrong

Link | Posted on Oct 14, 2018 at 17:27 UTC

Too expensive...

Link | Posted on Sep 28, 2018 at 05:02 UTC as 217th comment
On article Verizon officially acquires Yahoo including Flickr (55 comments in total)
In reply to:

Mark Turney: I downloaded all my images from Flickr and deleted my account once ai heard of this pending sale. I'm just not confident in a cell phone company (about as honest as car salesmen or lawyers) hosting my intellectual property.

Your intellectual property? Oh please.......

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2017 at 00:58 UTC
On article Steve Huff: 'Why I love my Micro Four Thirds System' (59 comments in total)

Small sensor.
Enough said

Link | Posted on May 27, 2017 at 01:37 UTC as 13th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

beavertown: Canon is like the number one camera giant of Apple that will never die like the phoenix. Number two Sony will always be number two.

Last time You said Nikon will always be number 2....I guess you keep getting things wrong....

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2017 at 01:58 UTC
In reply to:

G1Houston: 'We’ve learned that some customers require exceptional lens performance'

But there are many more who just want lighter, smaller, and less expensive, but quality lenses.

People want everything ..confirmed..

Link | Posted on Feb 27, 2017 at 18:15 UTC

Dp has convinced no one with this article

Link | Posted on Dec 22, 2016 at 04:14 UTC as 51st comment
On article Modern Mirrorless: Canon EOS M5 Review (1624 comments in total)

M5
Too little, too late, too expensive

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2016 at 21:52 UTC as 158th comment

So Glad that I didn't fall for the 6300 hype.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 18:54 UTC as 150th comment | 11 replies
In reply to:

Jeff Greenberg: Seeing comments "A6500 destroys Canon M5".
WHY??? Authoritative list of unbiased reasons appreciated.

Does A6500 AF match A7rII AF wrt speed & accuracy?
How high does A6500 in-camera flash sit above lens?
High enough to avoid lens shade semi-circle shadowing?
(or offer an adapter to avoid it?)

Sidebar: why did Sony fumble chance to make its
G24-70 f2.8 best in class??!!!
(a couple other have higher Dx0 rankings AFAICT)

I'd get A6500 in an instant if there was high quality
fast lightweight hyperzoom for it -- even if tele end
was slow f6.3... (f2.8-f6.3) say 24-240 equivalent
Optical engineers: could high end 24-240mm f2.8-6.3
for 1.5x sensor be under, say, 24 oz?

M5 is the biggest disappointment this year. Period.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 18:52 UTC
On article Sony announces FE 50mm F1.4 ZA prime lens (268 comments in total)
In reply to:

caravan: The hits keep coming from Sony at very affordable prices.

Leica is better

Link | Posted on Jul 11, 2016 at 19:26 UTC

Not impressed

Link | Posted on Jun 13, 2016 at 16:59 UTC as 51st comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

PKDanny: 70-300 will also be available in May at a price of $1199. Is wrong price.

$700 for this lens.

Sony profit $1,000. Huh.

Give me a break....contra....
Go buy yourself a Chinese knockoff and call it a day....

Link | Posted on Mar 30, 2016 at 00:57 UTC

physics?

Link | Posted on Mar 17, 2016 at 02:03 UTC as 80th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Andersonm: Weird, it only looks like 1920x1080 on my laptop screen

U need to get a sony laptop for it to work

Link | Posted on Oct 15, 2015 at 18:11 UTC
On article Sony brings uncompressed Raw to a7S II, a7R II and... (556 comments in total)
In reply to:

photomedium: 99% of the sony users will rightfully savor their picture 'tartar', they will see no difference, and will go right back to lossy compression (or straight back to jpgs), but no one will care to admit it. ;-)

I always said that raw is overrated

Link | Posted on Sep 15, 2015 at 20:17 UTC
In reply to:

Promit: Okay, let's get a couple of the common ones out of the way, shall we?

"Canon keeps making a great camera even better."
"Finally Canon is acknowledging that their flagship sports DSLR still needs work."
"Now if only Canon could fix the dynamic range in a firmware update."
"Pointless, just buy a A7R II instead. DSLRs are dead."
"This level of of commitment to pros is why Canon will never lose marketshare to other brands."
"Good to see they're not charging for firmware updates like Panasonic."
"Sony <whatever> is better."
"Nikon <whatever> is better."
"Overpriced camera that still doesn't focus well."
"The best crop DSLR on the market keeps getting better."
"I had a 7D2 and it was the worst camera ever made. Now I shoot with four D810s and thirty thousand dollars of lenses."
"I had a D810 and it was the worst camera ever made. Now I shoot with the 7D2 and only these Canon lenses."
"My iPhone still focuses faster."
"No EVF, no point."
"Nikon needs to release the D400 immediately."

Promit has too much free time on his hands....

Link | Posted on Sep 9, 2015 at 20:17 UTC
On article A lot to like: Real-world Leica Q gallery posted (340 comments in total)
In reply to:

(unknown member): Is it just me but is it difficult to see any real difference between any of these cameras in daylight regardless of price or sensor size?
Probably I have got the wrong electron microscope.
I am sure you could get pictures similar to this from a Canon Ixus (other brands are available).

Raw is overrated

Link | Posted on Sep 1, 2015 at 21:53 UTC
Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »