PhotoFactor

You are luckier than me, as I had CS4 and it failed to work properly when I upgraded from Win 7 to Win 10. I think Adobe had a free separate DNG converter. There's lots of free SW out there but of ...

The PZ 1650 is kind of crap for stills, but probably fine for video. Nice and small, too. If you want IBIS then it's the A6600, otherwise if you are tripod or gimbaling, any will do. The newest ...

Well I come from a Pentax MX SLR which is of course FF and around the size of the OMD-EMii. So I don't really want some hulking press-sized camera with me on my vacations. Also the EMii has IBIS ...

Updated sensors. Also size. Newer M43 camera bodies are too big. I can get Sony APS-C for that body size, so why would I use M43 instead? Keep something like an OMD-EMxx with a 26MP updated sensor ...

Honestly I got it like only a month ago and have done very limited shooting with it, due to family and holidays and other stuff going on. I hope to use it much more in the coming months.

Well honestly, as a left-hander, I've had to adjust to Return and keypad on the right on the computer; a right handed mouse; and most buttons and controls on the right on cameras, so I think we can...

IQ is not much changed from the A6000 to the newer models. AF is less capable on the A6000, but is still pretty decent. So if not high demands on AF, the A6000 is still a great camera.

I'd have to disagree with this post. Two factors I can think of: 1 - You are also cropping the sharpness of the lens. APS-C lenses could be sharper as they're designed for the smaller format. Again ...

I use a Pixel and have had M43. In my opinion: Pixel is great for snapshots, has superior processing of tonemapping versus default Jpg processing in traditional cameras. You're going to get a well ...

The Sigma 30 f2.8 is quite sharp (probably sharper than the Sony 35 f1.8) and smaller as well. Just as long as you can do with somewhat less functional AF (no full tracking, and only center area). ...

Sigma had an original trio of f2.8 lenses that are now discontinued but you might be able to find them used. All pretty small, and increasingly sharp with longer focal lengths, with the 60 very ...

Fair enough if the ergonomics don't work for you. Lens selection - sure Canon and Nikon are still early, but at least for Canon at this time it appears there won't be a third party AF selection. If ...

If you want one system, the answer is obviously Sony E, which has both smaller APS C as well as FF which is also pretty small. As well as the best lens selection of any mount.

For sports on a budget I'd get a Sony APS-C such as A6400 or A6600: 1 - Class leading tracking AF 2 - APS-C is lower cost but gives better reach at the same focal length

It's a great, highly regarded lens. Likely the sharpest lens available for Sony E APS-C. I originally bought the Sony 50 1.8 for the OSS, but felt the lens sharpness was just ok. Then sold the Sony ...

Everything is a tradeoff. With Fuji, you get a smaller third party lens selection and weaker AF, but newer sensors and better ergonomics. You could switch but then miss the AF and lens selection ...

I see it as sort of jpg is 20% of the way to full quality, RAW is 100% of full quality, and compressed RAW is like 95%. Where I've read you could see it is for example in astro with some stars ...

EVEN if the OP is correct (not convinced at all), with 10 posts to his/her credit, quite classless to post an open letter to youtubers on their 10th post, IMHO. Happy New Year!

"proves how far DPR's POSTERS have fallen..." Fixed it for you.

Dead, folded into Sony Doing great, top of class performance, especially FF and autofocus Do they even still exist? They're OM Digital Solutions now, still coming out with rewarmed cameras, not ...