nathantw

Lives in United States United States
Joined on Jun 11, 2009

Comments

Total: 172, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1984 comments in total)
In reply to:

nathantw: When people shoot these comparisons why don't they use the same darn lens on all the cameras? There are adapters for all of them and there has to be one lens that will fit them. I personally would use a Hasselblad V-series lens on each camera since it will fit on all of them. It would make them all consistent.

Hmm, haven't experienced what you've said with my Hasselblad lens and my Nikon D700 or D810, but hey, I guess you know best.

Here are a couple examples with the 180mm lens. You can zoom in if you want.

http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/182678
http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/157193

If the lens vignettes then you'll see it on the individual frames, but since you seem to know all about lenses and adapters, I guess it's my imagination that there's no vignetting in the Gigapans. Maybe you'll see some in this photo: http://www.gigapan.com/gigapans/130363

Link | Posted on Jun 2, 2016 at 04:56 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1984 comments in total)
In reply to:

nathantw: When people shoot these comparisons why don't they use the same darn lens on all the cameras? There are adapters for all of them and there has to be one lens that will fit them. I personally would use a Hasselblad V-series lens on each camera since it will fit on all of them. It would make them all consistent.

It was an example of how you could use one lens on all the cameras to keep it consistent. No, you can't test autofocus, but you could test how each camera's sensors look since there is absolutely no variation on the lens. You won't need to correct for distortion, vignetting or flare since the adapter is usually a straight through with no optics. Well, regardless, it was just an example.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2016 at 19:16 UTC
In reply to:

wh13: post a NSFW besides Emma Gruner's link

i was lucky no one in my office looked at my screen when i clicked it... now i need to see if i get flagged by corporate IT

It's probably the most clicked of the group now. That was my first choice.

Link | Posted on May 24, 2016 at 00:30 UTC
On article Benchmark Performance: Nikon D810 review (1984 comments in total)

When people shoot these comparisons why don't they use the same darn lens on all the cameras? There are adapters for all of them and there has to be one lens that will fit them. I personally would use a Hasselblad V-series lens on each camera since it will fit on all of them. It would make them all consistent.

Link | Posted on May 22, 2016 at 17:32 UTC as 38th comment | 18 replies

I'll agree with Time.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2016 at 21:00 UTC as 10th comment

HALLELUJAH! It's about time!

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2016 at 02:58 UTC as 39th comment
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (281 comments in total)
In reply to:

nathantw: Let's look at it this way, if your livelihood depended on your camera to capture "The Moment" which camera would you buy? I know I would go with the D5 instead of a $3k Sony.

I'd take that Phase One to go with my Hasselblad. ;-)

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2016 at 03:20 UTC
On article Nikon D5 real-world low light, high ISO samples (281 comments in total)

Let's look at it this way, if your livelihood depended on your camera to capture "The Moment" which camera would you buy? I know I would go with the D5 instead of a $3k Sony.

Link | Posted on Apr 4, 2016 at 00:10 UTC as 8th comment | 4 replies
In reply to:

nathantw: If you want to make a lens that will last "forever" then you better start by making it out of a material that will last "forever" and not break down. I don't think rubber gaskets are going to help since they can melt into sticky goo. Then put them into a mount that won't change, such as what Nikon, Leica and Pentax did.

Notice I specifically didn't say it had to made of metal? I did that on purpose. Some plastics get brittle and break after a few decades, especially if it's out in the sun, so notice I said didn't "break down?"

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 18:02 UTC
In reply to:

Turbguy1: So far, the Nikon F mount and the Leica M mount come closest to "living forever", PERIOD!

Pretty sure the Pentax K-mount is still going strong too.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 02:08 UTC

If you want to make a lens that will last "forever" then you better start by making it out of a material that will last "forever" and not break down. I don't think rubber gaskets are going to help since they can melt into sticky goo. Then put them into a mount that won't change, such as what Nikon, Leica and Pentax did.

Link | Posted on Feb 6, 2016 at 02:08 UTC as 25th comment | 3 replies

The culprit is film. Everyone is going back to it. LOL

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2016 at 06:56 UTC as 57th comment | 3 replies
On article 1.4 and More: Canon EF 35mm F1.4L II comparison (243 comments in total)

Now that's what I'm expecting in a modern lens, CA is corrected and no color fringing. Why Canon and Nikon seemed to think this was okay and charged a fortune so you can have the privilege of using them. Good to see at least one company that changed their way.

It appears Sigma did it right the first time.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2016 at 05:12 UTC as 38th comment
In reply to:

nathantw: Who pays the tax on that wonderful high-end medium format camera? The photographer, of course.

So, EthanP99, you're working very hard to get clients (and to get them to pay), you make whatever you can. Then you win a prize and suddenly you're out $5000 when tax time comes. Yeah, great. Complaining? No, just being realistic.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2016 at 00:30 UTC
In reply to:

nathantw: Who pays the tax on that wonderful high-end medium format camera? The photographer, of course.

It's all fun and games until the tax man comes.

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2016 at 00:26 UTC

Who pays the tax on that wonderful high-end medium format camera? The photographer, of course.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 15:35 UTC as 25th comment | 13 replies

So, is this like a GoPro camera where you take it with you to shoot everything? That's the impression I got with this video.

I really, really liked that video shot in the helicopter when they're following that train. That was a unique view that I've never seen before. Very cool.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2016 at 04:08 UTC as 3rd comment
On article Cinetics Axis360 review (70 comments in total)
In reply to:

brittonx: Um... What about GigaPan? They are pretty affordable...

I actually own a Gigapan Epic 100 and a Epic Pro and the Pro. The Epic 100 is light and portable but the downside is that you can't do night photography and the stepping increments aren't as fine as the Pro. The Epic Pro is very, very nice and versatile, but very big and heavy though I can put up to 15 pounds onto it, which I have.

Link | Posted on Jan 1, 2016 at 07:09 UTC
On article Video: a look at the Sony Cyber-shot RX1R II (125 comments in total)

What did he say? A couple firmware upgrades from greatness? LOL. From what I heard people who buy this will be lucky to get even one firmware upgrade.

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2015 at 14:43 UTC as 35th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Denis of Whidbey Island: Would knowledge of large format black and white photography with a digital insert qualify?

Only if you can handle a traditional darkroom also.

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2015 at 08:21 UTC
Total: 172, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »