upgrader

I will keep my Loxia 21mm beside the 16-35 G-Master. Beside a rattling lens hood on the 16-35GM that I need to solve with Sony somehow I am also very happy. For the sunstars, the relative small ...

I cannot view any Sony RX100V RAW files in Aperture. I am running the latest OSX version. What can I do? When opening the RAW file on the desktop it normally opens and can be viewed...

Did the RX100IV also already record 5K footage by downsampling the data to 4K UHD or does this only the RX100V? If not, the 4K quality should be better with the Mark V, correct?

Works great with larger lenses. The great thing is without the extension you have a very compact camera with lenses like the 35mm 2.8 or 24-70mm f4. So the best out of two worlds.

Same here, it's a great lens but hard to find a really good copy. I gave it up and bought "the better" if not the best lens in the complete Sony system, the Sony Zeiss 50mm Planar ZA. Very little ...

I shoot also with the 85GM and the 50mm 1.4 Planar Sony Zeiss just complements it perfectly. Actually the effective FL is only 47mm and the perfect filler for the 16-35mm GM that is on preorder. I ...

Thanks for the review. Amazing how the Sony holds up vs. the Loxia. The DXO numbers show different results here (quite an advantage for the Loxia in sharpness) I would have bought the Loxia if the ...

In the UWA focal range I landed with zooms. The flexibility is a big factor. Always the 16-35 GM!

Had the Batis and kept the GM. Overall the Batis is more a landscape lens with it's ZEISS contrast and the GM THE perfect portrait lens.

I also wanted the 35mm 1.4 but gave up after 3 copies. After switching to the 50mm 1.4 Sony Zeiss and 85mm 1.4 GM personally I live great with the small f2.8 in the 35mm area and compensate the ...

No need with that lens to execute a special test. You will see right away when you shoot wide open and check on the screen by zooming in. Usually the right side is unsharp. Tried 3 copies without ...

Guy,s the lens is  not released to the public yet.. I am confident it will be better than the Zeiss f4. Some other reports showed this. Just to rely on the one report at the lake that was IMHO ...

All correct and well explained. It's not everything about sharpness in a lens. The 50mm 1.4 Planar provides the ultimate 3D Pop of all available FE lenses. Just another level when compared to the ...

Thank you for the comparison, even it was quick and dirty. (Why is the FL so different in the shoots? Different camera-positions or is the GM really longer?) I still love the look of the 16-35 GM ...

Thanks for your input here so far. It looks I will sell the 35mm 2.8 Sony Zeiss and 55mm 1.8 Sony Zeiss, keep the creamy 35mm 1.4 Sony Zeiss Distagon and buy the 50mm 1.4 Sony Zeiss Planar to ...

Given the fact that the G-Master line is positioned on top together with the FE-Sony-Zeiss lenses I wonder how the new 16-35 GM will do @35mm wide open. The G-Master lenses are optimized for ...

Hi there, I wonder if there is a need for a fast 35mm or any other candidate under consideration of my following preordered/existing lenses: Sony 16-35mm f2.8 G-Master (Preordered) Sony Zeiss 35mm f2.8

It's much more than the pure comparison of sharpness when you dive deeper into photography. Contrast is great with the 1.4 as well it has nearly zero CA's vs. the 55mm which is very pronounced ...

No problem, you need to get the battery out an in again. After that everything works as you are used to. Had the same failure.

Thanks, I know the 16-35 or 17-40 from Canon are must have FL especially for landscape. How do you guys complement this Zoom with other lenses?