ekaton

I will buy it.

seems you misunderstood my post with quotes from Mr. superlatives

"....easy to see big differences....", "".......did numerous comparisons....." , "...difference was night and day....", "....tonal output incredibly rich.....", "....incredible dynamic range....", ...

A good and well balanced summary. However, the latest generation of mft 20MP sensors in the EM1 MII and GH5 comes close to the X-Trans iso performance, as close as about 1/2 stop. And, in contrast ...

Exactly. + Fuji needs to work on excellent compact zooms, 24-120mm f4 for example.

....it deteriorated to two know it all guys exchanging pleasantries......

In may case it replaced a Leica M. The H is soo much more value than the red dot as a "highest IQ possible" walk around tool. The GFX could not take its role. Oh, and did I say size? Yes, size ...

Very impressive specs at a surprisingly reasonable price. Well done N!

Wow, show us that shirt........;-)

Too big, way too big. As is the 25mm 1.2.  A Sony A7II(R) with the Zeiss 35 f2.8 is the better choice. When it comes to fast primes Olympus forgot what mft ("micro") should be about.

If weather sealed, lighter and optically better, the new Olympus might be a buy. Just kidding, as the Olympus will neither be better nor lighter........

A 600 USD wart turns your hand polished 2000 USD aluminum beauty into a useless lump of garbage. What an engineering marvel and what a story line.

Made in Germany: Uber Alles.

Imagine: Leica received the one inch sensor from the Sony RX100V and mated it with the Digilux 2 lens, Leica calibrated image processor,  Digilux 2 UI, manual controls & 2017 electronics.

DR, high iso, resolution of the A7r2 are leaps and bounds better. The A7M2 has a decent FF sensor, but not really significantly better than best in class aps-c. The A7r2's sensor is a monster, up ...

Hey, I use a 12-100 f8 and find it splendid.

Splendid job, Jono. And I might follow your idea of swapping my fun/family outing, travel light mft gear for this version of the TL.

:-) Thanks.

Am I right in assuming that you did not grow up in the film era? And that you are either young or relatively new to photography (or both).

That's a new one. The STATISTICS. LOL