billslatteryjr

Thanks for trying to help Brian. It's in the hands of FedEx now. Glad I bought it from B&H.

Just updated the firmware to 1.10 and while it still runs at around 6FPS with or without silent shutter the buffer now holds 90 RAW or 105 JPG photos before it bogs down. Go figure. Oh well. ...

Thanks gents. I tried DRO off and both hi and hi+ and have the 2 fastest cards there are for this thing, the Sony Tough and a Delkin Power. They both work at 20FPS photographing the second hand on ...

Got a used a7r4 from B&H and I can't get it to shot faster than 6FPS. It'll usually give me right around 60+ photos before bogging down after 10 seconds or so shooting RAW compressed or even just ...

Already have both the Nikon 400E and a Sony a6600. Have a Nikon D3500 also. But the Sony would give me more FPS.

Is there any adapter that'll let me manually focus the newest Nikon 400mm E f2.8 on a Sony a6600. Looking to use the 400 wide open mostly. How about something that'd autofocus. Doesn't have to be ...

Yep you are biased. Polin gave a preview not a review. While I'm sure the guy is loaded and gets great price breaks from Allen's Camera, ;-) he is probably ticked off like a lot of us that he has ...

As one who shoots sports primarily and likes big apertures Sony needs at least another prime or 2, like a 300mm f2.8 & 200mm f2, and another zoom or 2, like a 120-300mm f2.8 & a 200-400mm f4, ...

Save your money. https://www.sonyalpharumors.com/rumor-5-years-after-we-might-get-the-new-sony-rx1riii-in-2020/

Yes I was joining in. Don't think I've ever used my a9 in AF-S. Can't recall using AF-S with the D850s either.

I tried shooting basketball games along with the 120-300mm Sport on a second. Having 300mm was a dream. But 120mm was way too long for anything up close. Even with 70mm one has to fast switch to ...

What he said.

Ya, one more stop at RAW high ISO doesn't seem right. Almost everyone else looks to have pretty much topped out. So when I heard the 1 stop high ISO rumor my first thought was 1 stop worse low ISO ...

The resolving max of most of these lenses is reached at apertures that most of those lens owners rarely use. One doesn't tend to buy an f1.4 lens to shoot it at f4+. Don't these results show that ...

And right you are. Thank you very much. May have saved me from buying a lens that would have been used little. Top is 98mm 2252x1501 =1.97MB and 3,380,252 pixels Bottom is 200mm 4381x2921= 7.04MB ...

So I've reduced the subject initially in half first by going from 200mm to 105mm? But than I've increased the subject by nearly 2x by using a 45MP camera instead of a 24MP camera? So that's a wash ...

Thank you ChristianHass. Figured pixels would be better but was too lazy to do the all the math last night. The average size of the ten photos that averaged 5.34MB in pixels is 12,988,349. So if I ...

If my finished cropped photo files average 5.34MB with a 24.2MP camera and a 200mm lens. What size files would they be if taken with a 45.7MP camera and a 105mm lens and cropped to the same FOV?