Gal Root

And seamless geotagging using Bluetooth. Happens automatically in the background.

And post focus / stacking.

Seems like it's the same lens.
To be honest I never had problems with the FZ1000 lens sharpness, it was always very sharp. Sure RX is a bit better but it cost 3 times as much (from original FZ1000).

Because the Leica version of the FZ1000 was so different. They changed the name :)

True, but you will have to carry two lenses. For me comfort is more important as I'll just stop using the cameras if I need to change lenses. I did that for 10 years and I do not miss it.

Well, you use it when you have it, but you manage just fine without it (unless you like animals / nature).
I used 400-800mm a lot of the FZ1000, but eventually sold it due to the size and weight...

Why aren't they sued in Europe then (according to your logic)?

Bluetooth for geotagging is amazing.

Of course.. But this one has zoom. Choose your flavor.

I agree. I would even welcome less than 400 if it means the FZ1000 would be smaller and lighter.

You forget that this is a 1" sensor.

Well, most obvious is that this is one lens. What you described are two or three lenses. It's a huge deal to have it all in one.
Also, it is smaller (with the lens) and possibly lighter.
Focus...

Well, I'm disappointed, but I don't hate them. The FZ1000 was great and this one addressed most of the issues with the original model.

The TZ90 really missed Bluetooth so that's a very welcomed...

None of them. It's software that is missing here. If phones can get away with much smaller sensor, the 1/2.3" can do just fine (obviously not pro stuff) with similar algorithms like on the Pixel.

That's just NR. Use manual or use gcam and you solved it.

To be honest, it kinda destroys the iPhone XS and in 1/3 of the price.

Indeed. And with gcam it should be even better.

"Y'know, you can't please all the people all the time... and last night, all those people were at my show." - Mitch Hedberg :) Seems relevant to this leak. I'm fine with this camera. I sold the ...

Yes,  A 1" with a good lens of around 24-200 will be smaller than the FZ1000. What's so hard?

Poor lens compared to the FZ1000. With the same logic one could argue you don't need the FZ1000 because of the TZ200.

Personally I would have wanted to see actually a shorter lens. 24-200 or so. Make it lighter and smaller.  Leave the long reach to the FZ2000.