Tomx72

I am about to replace my Panny gear, a7rII is a main candidate. If it works 100% fine on the sony and half decent with the panny, I am fine with that. The sony 200/600 is 500€ more expensive here.

Sony managed it years ago with FF (a7rII)...

Nature, family, lots of shots with non-ideal lighting conditions (shadows vs highlights). Not much about myself. Internal 10bits recording would be really great but it seems nobody cares to put ...

Coming from Panasonic - actually haven't left camp yet - I'd never buy a camera without IBIS, period.

If Fuji could merge the AF and video skills of the T3 with the IBIS and ergonomy of the s-H1, it would be a no-brainer for me. Now I am a bit puzzled. Size/weight difference between the two systems ...

Don't forget, that fuji's "high iso" is not the same as Sony's, there is about an 1EV difference. The X-T3 is basically a6400 level concerning ISO.

Check Olympus, Panasonic, IBIS is an absolutely great invention. With well maintained algorithms it can even add an EV to OIS. Besides, with IBIS you at least have a chance to stabilize an 1.2/56, ...

I don't do selfies either, mostly nature, family shots. Suspected, that the 8bit can be restrictive somewhat. I suppose the DR setting might help here?

AF performance is also a software-thing, I was wondering if anyone still has the Sigma and noticed any improvement thanks to FW updates? Or anyone tried the Metabones mk V? I am putting together a ...

I am considering a step up from my Panasonic gx80, and the two main candidates are the Fuji x-h1 and the Sony a7rII. Key points: - PDAF (Panny GH5 out :() - decent resolution and dynamic range - ...

I am in a similar situation, thinking about a 2nd hand a7rII and the x-h1 . The two bodies cost the same, glass too. I do video, where the x-h1 has an edge but also landscapes, where the a7rII has ...

As a long-time Panasonic user, I can tell you that IBIS in micro 4/3 systems is top-notch, Olympus 5-axis being the best but Panasonic (licensed from Olympus?) comes close. And one thing: it is not ...

Sorry, I meant to answer to the OP :-)

Let's play the devil's advocate for a moment, but we can also just be plain realistic: Fuji's sensor is made by Sony, not by God, period. They use the same silicon, same tech as they're using for ...

Very interesting. Not in my immediate plans to get a Z body but in case I do I'd love to keep my EF-mount lenses, especially that I am about to buy the new bigma (60-600) soon - with EF mount.

I know the T3 is the new king in video, but how does the X-H1 compare? I loose the 10bit and 60fps according to the figures, but e.g. how does the IBIS fare during video shooting with the current ...

The A7III, A9 are not exactly small and they got customers. Body size is not everything, especially if you're shooting a 2.8/300...

It's a small step forward in detail, there are actual measured numbers here , 3,700l/ph vs 3,400l/ph of the t3. That's the theory, shooting from a tripod in a studio, at the sweet spot of a high ...

Indeed, the 60-600 is 6lbs by itself, needs considerable strength just to carry. The much lighter Canon 100-400mkII+1.4x TC is near the same quality as I summarized from test shots, that combo ...

Here is a review supporting your thoughts: https://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/reviews/compacts/canon-eos-90d-hands-on-first-look/7 You can find most Fujis on the site without linking a specific ...