-
Canon: We've investigated the current field of offerings, and found a gap: Fixed focal length telephotos that still have a telescoping body like zoom lenses! Photographers: That's the only thing...
-
It was a pure blue sky, I just put it in grayscale in Photoshop because it's easier to see any sensor dust. I did have the 1.4x teleconverter on, I wonder if that has anything to do with it. It ...
-
Haha well Sony is usually ahead of the competition. Yes the 4 o'clock is a dust ball on the sensor, there are also a bunch of smaller particles. Time to get out the rocket blower.
-
Well I was shooting at the sky to check for dust, and it seems the center of the exposure is just a shade lighter than the rest. It's hardly noticeable until I crank up the contrast like I do when ...
-
That's the most logical explanation for sure. It's just a bit odd that not only new, but older lenses are still available everywhere... like the old FE 70-300 telephoto, the 50mm 1.8 crop portrait ...
-
OK they haven't officially said anything, but for months now, it's been unavailable on Amazon, and now it's unavailable on Adorama and B&H ('backordered'). Of course it could have to do with ...
-
Maybe this is more a graphic design question.. but it involves processing photographs. Has anyone seen something like this in a program they use? Any ideas what effect might be used to completely ...
-
Not to hijack the thread, but I also just bought all the Affinity graphics apps, they are currently 50% off. So $24.99 each I got Photo, Designer (vector), and Publisher. Amazing deal! The mobile...
-
@munn1 yes I agree the photography plan is a good price, I'd buy that over Netflix. However, I need Illustrator, InDesign, and video editing as well. There's no plan for all these for under $70....
-
moga For me just Photoshop, Lightroom, Illustrator, InDesign, and Premiere Pro. That covers my photography and graphic design and video. Those total $73 though so the All Apps is cheaper. Currently...
-
The all apps plan is $53 monthly. So in 5 years someone could buy a $3000 lens with that. Realistically, the best Sony prime lenses are probably $1500 or less (50mm f/1.4 etc). So a top of the line...
-
But even before Autel, I patented 'stuff that looks cool and flies'
-
Well, they said send it in for repair, but it's brand new so an exchange from Amazon makes more sense. And, yes, a lens where it's a crap shoot whether you get a good 'version' or not of a $1500 ...
-
Thanks for the tips. Yes the post is a rant since I had looked forward so much to the lens for so long Lol. But also I've since read quite a lot of reports of pulsing issues with only this GM ...
-
Thanks I'll probably exchange it and hope for the best. Your train picture is amazingly sharp where the rather thin f/2 focal plane is. My pictures were f/6 to f/11 and not as good.
-
Maybe his is a bad copy as well. I thought my 100-400 image, while not incredible, is nice for a zoom lens. This one from the 24mm has weird sharp areas in the foreground, but my focus spot was on ...
-
Just thought I'd add to this thread that my new copy can't acquire focus on AF-C, but just pulses back and forth, yes I can feel the thudding but more distracting is the image in the viewfinder ...
-
Here's the same a7 body with my 100-400GM, at f/8, no processing. Granted it has image stabilization in the lens. But I was using over 1/200 shutter on the 24 at f9, which should be plenty of ...
-
Maybe I'm not doing enough post processing, I could boost saturation and use the 'sharpen more' filter..
-
Compare to this guy's image at only f/4, it's razor sharp on an a6300. Mine at f/9 is mush in large swaths of the image. I also have an a6300 and the 24mm images look bad on that too. If I have ...
Activity older than 12 months is not displayed.
|
Total messages |
43 |
Threads started |
9 |
Last post |
6 months ago |
Photos uploaded |
5 |
Last upload |
Jan 25, 2020 |
|