Maoby

The first digital SLRs and more ... It's also true that the first digital camera had a tendency toward black The first ten years 1991-2001

That's right, you are absolutely right. Black, if available, cost a little more Fujicarex II (1964) Fujica 35-ML (1960) Fujica Six IICS (1952)

To each one his piton :-D The Fujifilm X-T5 with the JJC lens hood (JXF56F12R)

Thank you so much 👍🏻

ISO 64 version is much better ;) Nikon D810 (64 ISO) f/8 100% / Fujifilm X-T5 (64 ISO) f/8 100%

👍🏻

Very interesting article, I highly recommend it. 👍🏻

I had made a comparison between my iPhone and my new D500 at the time. This might interest you! iPhone 6s (2015) / Nikon D500 (2016) https://www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72157665535820359 Per ...

Any other suggestions?

Thank you very much!

Here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720304512245/with/52569095484/ N°21 Nikon D810 (12800 ISO) N°21 Fujifilm X-T5 (12800 ISO)

I finally opted for the silver Fujica ST701 (1971)  Fujifilm X-T5 (2022)  Fujica ST801 (1973)

Thank you very much for giving your feedback.

I also have my father's :-D Yashica-A (1959)

50-year interval The ST701 My first Reflex, Purchased on 01/25/1972 The X-T5 is My last ML, Purchased on 11/22/2022 Fujica ST701 (1971-74) / Fujifilm X-T5 (2022)

And what about the evolution of LCD monitors Fujifilm FinePix S1 Pro (2000) / Fujifilm X-T5 (2022)

First, the comparisons are always made primarily for my personal needs. And then I share them with those who might be interested. For treatment, at the risk of repeating myself, I voluntarily apply ...

Thank you to the first two speakers 👍🏻

Tell me if you have the same opinion on the other comparisons made in recent years With the Sigma sd Quattro H, choose two or three comparisons that speak to you. Nikon D3s (2009) / Sigma Quattro H ...

400 ISO, is not Sigma's strength See others: https://www.flickr.com/photos/maoby/albums/72177720305330500