Lives in Netherlands Netherlands
Works as a truck driver
Has a website at
Joined on Jul 12, 2010
About me:

to boldly go where no man has ever gone before


Total: 133, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Huawei Mate 10 Pro camera review (163 comments in total)

this sharp pictures for a phone , I did not think we'd come here anytime soon!

Link | Posted on Jan 17, 2018 at 14:07 UTC as 4th comment
On article Panasonic Lumix DC-GH5S First Impressions Review (327 comments in total)

How far did we come since Gh2 ...

Link | Posted on Jan 8, 2018 at 19:01 UTC as 93rd comment

what a nice set of images!

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2018 at 21:00 UTC as 10th comment
On a photo in the Sigma 16mm F1.4 DC DN (Micro Four Thirds) Sample Gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

nice one !

Link | Posted on Jan 7, 2018 at 20:59 UTC as 1st comment

what a waste of tax payers money ....

Link | Posted on Dec 15, 2017 at 21:15 UTC as 9th comment
On article Olympus 17mm F1.2 Pro sample gallery (415 comments in total)
In reply to:

uMad: Equivalent to a 35mm f/2.4 lens on full frame or a 23mm f/1.6 on APS-C. There, I said it, no further equivalence discussion relevant.

One doesn't have to like the price to like the pictures though

you forget iphone and medium format equivalence

Link | Posted on Dec 10, 2017 at 15:47 UTC

this was joy to read! ty

Link | Posted on Dec 7, 2017 at 18:28 UTC as 115th comment
In reply to:

BadScience: what is the light source that is illuminating the rock pillars?

it's Brighten shadows brush in lightroom

Link | Posted on Dec 2, 2017 at 17:08 UTC
In reply to:

inorogNL: The previous lumix G model introduction price was 900 dolarz....

I like this camera also but still can not not notice this price hop! :)

Link | Posted on Nov 10, 2017 at 17:32 UTC
In reply to:

inorogNL: The previous lumix G model introduction price was 900 dolarz....

Rihass, that's Gx model, previos G model was dmc-G85

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 21:02 UTC

The previous lumix G model introduction price was 900 dolarz....

Link | Posted on Nov 8, 2017 at 19:53 UTC as 68th comment | 12 replies
On article Video: Meet the world's fastest camera slider (34 comments in total)

awesome, this individual is so gifted!

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2017 at 20:09 UTC as 19th comment
On a photo in the Peacock Feather Macro Photos sample gallery (1 comment in total)

beyond unreall

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2017 at 19:43 UTC as 1st comment
On article Panasonic Leica DG 15mm F1.7 shooting experience (406 comments in total)

my next lens, almost inpossible to find second hand here in holland

Link | Posted on Jul 22, 2017 at 13:29 UTC as 54th comment | 3 replies
On article Nikon reshuffles management structure (244 comments in total)

is it time to jump the ship ?

Link | Posted on May 19, 2017 at 18:37 UTC as 77th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

Archiver: This is the kind of thought experiment and comparison that I love to make, albeit as a way to dissuade myself from spending yet more money on gear. As I already have a X100 (original) and Ricoh GR, it's easy for me to compare them with other gear I have lying around.

GM1 + Pana 14/2.5 or Oly 17/1.8:

The 14/2.5 is a bit soft compared with the GR and even the X100, but has higher dynamic range and much more shallow DoF than a small sensor cam like the GRD series or LX7. The GM1 files respond really well in Lightroom, too.

The Oly 17/1.8 is easily comparable to the Fuji X100, IMO, and is a good choice if you want a m43 equivalent to that camera. It doesn't focus quite a close, but it completely lacks the soft glow of the X100 wide open.

The only issue is the handling, where the X100 sits really nicely in the hand and GM1/5 is small and a bit fiddly.

There is this very nice grip for gm1, I use most of the time, little less pocketable but it holds so well

Link | Posted on May 16, 2017 at 20:55 UTC
In reply to:

medon78: The OOC JPEGs ain't so bad. But not really satisfying, either.
Seems kind of strange to me that after almost 20 years of consumer digital cameras not every manufacturer is able to get at least 90% of the "gold standard" for color rendition, be it either Canon/Nikon/Olympus/Fuji.

For most consumers a camera with really GREAT color rendition (incl. some sort of smart gradation / auto contrast) would be it. Just like Apple does with the iPhone...

Who really does care about noise-free ISO 51200? Or maybe even 4k video?
... IF the colors are so-so?

Fuji jpgs are lets say perfect. would put olympus in second place, panasonic has always had this strange greenish tone, but are much beter(neutral) now than few models back. At least how I see it :)

Link | Posted on May 13, 2017 at 21:47 UTC

I totaly lost it with all this new model names from panasonic :/

Link | Posted on May 11, 2017 at 16:36 UTC as 75th comment | 5 replies


Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2017 at 11:46 UTC as 24th comment
On article Ask the staff: electronic or optical viewfinder? (890 comments in total)

I swicthed from mirrorles to nikon fx, amount of shots I miss is far greater now than before, I am just not used to constantly reviewing taken shots on back lcd, that said I think for majority of us evf offers more in complete package than ovf

Link | Posted on Mar 12, 2017 at 12:36 UTC as 348th comment
Total: 133, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »