blank_

you can crop the 28 to 40 but not the other way around :) But seriously.. they're both great focal lengths. I'd probably still rather have the 28mm as I'd mainly use it for travel, reportage and ...

Never read an article beggining "five", "five best" etc.

Autel just announced the two models with various sensors: http://autelrobotics.com/productdetail/23.html Did anyone catch the camera specs? Focal lengths, zoom or prime, variable vs fixed aperture ...

I was searching whole internet to compare the mini and air 2s, but then I saw these two galleries and the answer is right  there :) For me the 1" is the way to go. But I shoot stills + ...

easy to check for yourself: https://www.dpreview.com/sample-galleries/9035981190/dji-mavic-mini-2-sample-gallery/0764359941 Good for what it is, but 1" is a big step up.

I was just debating that in DJI store and the conlusion was that the real difference is almost non existent and to be even less with legislation coming next year. Autel is also bringing the Nano ...

Look at the samples in dpreview reviews for both Mini 2 and Air 2s. I believe Air 2s is he way to go. Mini has ok video, but still images are mobile phone quality. There is a big leap in IQ there, ...

For me it depends on the subject. For landscapes etc. I'd much prefer the GR or a compact system camera, but reportage and street is fine with the phone. Everytime I see what Dmitry Markov can do ...

these are all great lenses, but I'd stay with native Sony lens at this range as there is so much to choose from. If the wallet allows the best way would be to have both 35/1.4 GM a 35/2.8  :)

To one of the earlier responses, my interest in the 28mm-40mm range is for a primary daily lens, for street and (very occasionally) environmental portraits. I don’t do landscapes, wildlife, and so ...

There is the hdr thing + the R3 viewfinder protrudes quite a lot, which may help too.

@panther fan
A7RIII as BrentSchumer wrote. A1 has great magnification and resolution, but I didn't try that one. With cameras up to A7RIII I'm not able to see the whole image in viewfinder with...

I agree that Sony could do better in this regard. The viewfinder is a pain to use with glasses.
I'm surprised that the R3 has such small VF magnification though (if the specs are correct) The R3...

I agree that Sony could do better in this regard. The viewfinder is a pain to use with glasses.
I'm surprised that the R3 has such small VF magnification though (if the specs are correct) The R3...

To me the focal length is perfect, but I change lenses often (more so primes) so I'd worry about the plastic to wear out.

I don't think it even makes sense from the marketing point of view.. a metal mount would cost few bucks and they could sell it for 50-100$ more?

Nice, but I hate the plastic mount.. Compared to what even cheapest FF cameras cost, I see no need to save few dollars on a mount. I'd like to use the lens few years from now..

the 70-200/4 is a good compromise over all and very good IQ - at least at 24mpix. @135mm is pretty good even wide open, but @200 I try to stay at f5.6 at least. What I miss is a good 1,4x Sony TC ...

I tried the 70-180 recently and it is a totally different lens in terms of build quality compared to my 70-200/4. Still, the build quality seems good enough and for reportage/portrait the 70-180 ...

yes, I played with the raw in C1.. it is a hard one :) not sure, what I'd do with it.. Maybe crop it to 16:9 and develop the reflection in the water in a different way that the rest of the image to ...