bolador

Joined on Oct 8, 2012

Comments

Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15

Is this the new little bigma ! ?
1.5kilograms. ..
Nahh

Link | Posted on Mar 11, 2016 at 11:45 UTC as 17th comment | 2 replies
On article DxOMark Mobile report: Samsung Galaxy Note 5 (15 comments in total)

How about handling.?
Is Api camera 2 fully implemented yet? With speed control an manual focus? Is there any control over the jpg development ala "pictute control"?

Link | Posted on Dec 30, 2015 at 11:52 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

Debankur Mukherjee: Can anyone make a low cost 6MP APS-C sensor with the same low light capability ??

You don't need them to.
Downscale your picture to 6mp and SNR will go up as you want..

Link | Posted on Sep 12, 2015 at 21:20 UTC
On article Samsung Galaxy Note 4 camera review (94 comments in total)
In reply to:

cleopatrae: it still doesnt support DNG on Lollipop?

Not by today. I have the latest Android 5.1.1 update and Nope!
Still no DNG/RAW nor manuals speed configuration.
Should we go LG G4 ????

Link | Posted on Sep 7, 2015 at 19:57 UTC

That would be the fastest regular zoom in draining wallets terms...

Link | Posted on Aug 5, 2015 at 11:55 UTC as 18th comment
In reply to:

bolador: I Had a FZ200 and then a D90 and a D7200.. with a 70-300 f4.5-5.6mm lens that costs the same as the new FZ200 you don't have the same reach nor light/noise. Or may be just about at 3x price and 4x weight using ISO 400 f/2.8 vs ISO1600 f/5.6 I the DSLR.
at the tele end FZ is hard, heavy and expensive to beat.
Yes a better, same size sensor would be helpful. . But still Panasonic camera is full no features an controls that coolpixs don't want to provide. ..

Is not what I ve said. I fact I ve sold the Pany. But is really portable and always handy. What cheaper tele can get more light than ISO 400 f/2.8?? At f/5.9 you need ISO1600 an that's a lot ISO for apsc DSLR just as workable as ISO 800 in a FZ..

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2015 at 15:17 UTC

I Had a FZ200 and then a D90 and a D7200.. with a 70-300 f4.5-5.6mm lens that costs the same as the new FZ200 you don't have the same reach nor light/noise. Or may be just about at 3x price and 4x weight using ISO 400 f/2.8 vs ISO1600 f/5.6 I the DSLR.
at the tele end FZ is hard, heavy and expensive to beat.
Yes a better, same size sensor would be helpful. . But still Panasonic camera is full of features an controls that coolpixs don't want to provide. ..

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2015 at 13:32 UTC as 54th comment

I Had a FZ200 and then a D90 and a D7200.. with a 70-300 f4.5-5.6mm lens that costs the same as the new FZ200 you don't have the same reach nor light/noise. Or may be just about at 3x price and 4x weight using ISO 400 f/2.8 vs ISO1600 f/5.6 I the DSLR.
at the tele end FZ is hard, heavy and expensive to beat.
Yes a better, same size sensor would be helpful. . But still Panasonic camera is full no features an controls that coolpixs don't want to provide. ..

Link | Posted on Jul 16, 2015 at 13:31 UTC as 55th comment | 4 replies
On article 2015 Superzoom Camera Roundup (187 comments in total)

No one has matched FZ200 f/2.8 lens yet. Don't forget it's bokeh. . And full pro characteristics..
Yes it's not 2015 and "only" 25-600eqmm. ..
can p900 do some long exposure at 400 or 800 ISO. . Others Pxxx can't. ..
coolpix are a bag of can'ts. .

Link | Posted on Jun 18, 2015 at 06:36 UTC as 56th comment | 2 replies
On article Nikon D7200 Review (644 comments in total)

As a former D90 waiting for this release to upgrade. I studied the prices and boght a D610. :D

Link | Posted on Jun 5, 2015 at 11:28 UTC as 81st comment | 2 replies
On article Opinion: The myth of the upgrade path (1621 comments in total)
In reply to:

Average User: Richard and others:
I like the article and also many of the comments. I think you were giving advice to relative new comers, to try to choose rather early, the system they want to go with, and then try to maximize that system.
You were saying that the upgrade path doesn't really work well in many cases because ff lenses aren't as good a choice for dx systems, as dx lenses, and visa versa. From an economic perspective, it is good advice.
But the commentary shows that the "upgrade path" is not nearly as linear as an orderly mind might conceive it. Rather it is more like a meandering path defined as we go along, by the unique specific needs and our "discoveries" as we learn. It's part of what makes phtography such a great hobby. There's just no end to what we can learn about how to get better. When I was trying to decide on direction, I finally put together two "idealized" packages: one ff and one dx. By way of example here they are

Yo can use tour Tokina 11-16 @ 16mm in a FF with no mechanical vignheting. Just like 11mm on Dx. So you wont need a new UW angle with a new FX.

Link | Posted on Jan 10, 2015 at 22:59 UTC

Phase focus, high quality EVF... why do mirrors still exists?

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2014 at 12:50 UTC as 8th comment
On article Leica unveils D-Lux 6 Silver Edition (92 comments in total)
In reply to:

Lee W: I have just replaced my Ford Mondeo badges with Bentley Continental one's. Maybe I have just quadrupled it's value...

Jajaja. Or buy the Volvo version of your ford.. the same as with cameras....

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2013 at 16:29 UTC
Total: 15, showing: 1 – 15