Dave

I haven't thought about selling any of my lenses because they are the latest versions and I am happy with their performance.  Time will tell whether that remains true.  I am also trying to avoid ...

18-135 USM served me well on a trip to Europe this summer, handling duties as varied as birthday celebrations, the Swiss Alps, tennis, ships and yachts in the Mediterranean Sea, cars at night in ...

AlanMars = Phydoux?

Good thing you didn't wait another day.

Destination?  Tours of what?

Amen.

I try to remember the challenge's subject when voting and select images that I think best adhere to it, rewarding those that exhibit excellent technique, creativity, etc. with extra weight.

Many of those cars are leased.

Seems an easy enough post-processing task.  :-P

Spontaneously or gravity/contact assisted?

Very happy with mine.

Out of curiosity, what is it you want Canon to change/add to its existing lineup?

Three added to Exhibition: Rocket Away! Flight Operations Start Your Engines

Nice shot.  Seeing a ball or target would have been helpful to tell the story.

More information and samples, please.  To start, how far away were you from subjects, and what were lighting conditions?  Was a Canon body available to try?

Please confirm you are saying Canon should design its lens caps to fit third-party filters. Should Canon also try to predict what filter manufacturers design and produce in the future? At best, ...

I just happened to have this oldie laying around. Space Camp, Huntsville, Alabama

Have a safe flight. I think Airports would make a dandy topic.

A 200-600 (or even 200-500) consistent with the 70-300 nano would be great. Sharp enough, fast-focusing, and (relatively) lightweight. I'd even settle for TC incompatibility. Bring it on, Canon!

Someone else can make a joke about extenders.