Simon Joinson

Simon Joinson

DPReview Administrator
Lives in United States SEATTLE, WA, United States
Works as a Editor, writer, photographer
Has a website at www.dpreview.com
Joined on Jul 9, 2002
About me:

This is my work. My family is my life. Dedicated to keeping my baby girl alive and free from the effects of Cystic Fibrosis as long as I can. http://www.cff.org/

Comments

Total: 841, showing: 341 – 360
« First‹ Previous1617181920Next ›Last »
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

luigibozi: DPR, which camera had ~40% clicks before Sony A7? Just curious.

we don't declare a camera of the year unless we've fully tested it. Not wanting to slight PopPhoto, but it is my understanding that they declared the A7r the camera of the year when they'd had it for a few days, and had not performed a full review. We will consider it for 2014. I find it hard to believe that you have any evidence to back up your suggestion that the majority of the hundreds of magazine and thousands of web reviewers declared the A7/A7R 'camera of the year' (not least because that's two cameras).

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2014 at 19:53 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

luigibozi: DPR, which camera had ~40% clicks before Sony A7? Just curious.

I've not counted but I've read em all and would say the A7 defenders are in the vast majority in these comments. Not much sony bashing here. .

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2014 at 15:12 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

Heaven is for real: Out of the 1100 comments, I can count how many agreed with the review because probably they never tried the camera, never owned this camera or hate Sony in general. On the other hand, probably close to 95% A7 owners disapprove of the findings by DP in regards to JPG quality. How could 95% be so wrong or maybe DP is wrong? It is like majority of scientists believe global warming is man made and a few it is not!

1) I love cameras, and i love photography. I have a fondness for many models, and I know some brands do certain things better, but none have my blind loyalty. And I do not 'love' or 'hate' any camera manufacturer. I've been working, independently, in this industry for well over half my life, and i've been lucky that I always had access to any camera I wanted. I own many cameras, some 100 years + old, some new, and have owned scores more. All the brands make some great, some good and a few terrible cameras. To suggest anyone that doesn't agree with your opinion is a 'Sony hater' is simply childish.
2) The S5 Pro review was almost 6 yrs ago, when storage was expensive. The complaint was valid (you can compress raw files losslessly)
3) The RX100 II is not perfect, but it got a high score, a silver award and was described as 'best in class'. It got our 'enthusiast compact of the year' award. I also own a Fuji X100, which is also far from perfect. Your point scoring is missing the point.

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2014 at 02:33 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

Heaven is for real: Out of the 1100 comments, I can count how many agreed with the review because probably they never tried the camera, never owned this camera or hate Sony in general. On the other hand, probably close to 95% A7 owners disapprove of the findings by DP in regards to JPG quality. How could 95% be so wrong or maybe DP is wrong? It is like majority of scientists believe global warming is man made and a few it is not!

I would certainly make sense those who agree with the conclusion are uninformed 'Sony haters', whereas those folks who spent the best part of two grand on this camera or are heavily invested in Sony are totally nonpartisan. I used the camera, agreed with the review conclusions and yet I just ordered an RX100 II and use several NEX models regularly. I don't love or hate Sony, mainly because I struggle to form an emotional bond with a giant multinational conglomerate corporation, even if they make some great products.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2014 at 01:33 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jonath: This is honestly not a cynical comment and is aimed more at Sony than DP, but I recall that Sony restricted sale of the A7 and particularly the A7r to its own store and selected retailers which didn't include Amazon for several months, certainly in the UK. Will the next version be sold through Amazon from launch in future? Will be interesting to see...

I'm pretty sure it was available from Amazon in the US from day one.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 23:34 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

fahfah: If this doesn't convince you that DP has a ridiculous bias AGAINST Sony, nothing will.

and yet we named the RX100 as Best high-end pocketable compact, the RX100 II as Best enthusiast compact camera a couple of months ago

Of the 32 Gold awards we've ever given, Sony is in second position:

Canon 8
Sony 7
Nikon 5
Olympus 3
Pentax 3
Panasonic 3
Fujifilm 3
Ricoh 1

Sony is also tied for number 2 (with Nikon) in the Silver Award leaderboard, at 14, (Canon has 17).

Explain to me exactly how the decision to give this particular camera a silver award shows evidence ridiculous bias?

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 17:03 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

Max Savin: I have had mine for a month now. Of the 15 "CONS" listed in the review, only the slow start up has any meaning for me. All of my systems lenses can be used on this body. My large dslrs and M8 have been unused since it's arrival and I am considering an A7r for back up or primary body.

for 15 years we have been listing the good points and the bad points in as much detail as possible in order for readers to make an informed decision. The cons listed do not, of course, have equal weight. Does 'fiddly battery cover' carry as much weight as 'worst in class image quality'? Of course not. We list everything we find and it's up to you to decide if it matters. If you only shoot raw you can ignore all comments on JPEGs, for example. If you only shoot manual exposure you don't need to worry about comments about auto modes. We have a large, broad audience, and we try to offer as much information for everyone as we can. We also offer a lot of context to our criticisms, including here, where we are at pains to point out that these are not big issues, can in part be mitigated by changing default settings, and will not be relevant to most users.

Link | Posted on Jan 24, 2014 at 03:12 UTC
On article Sony Alpha 7 Review (1600 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sam147: Are these reviewers having a laugh? Why would you buy such a camera if you are going to re edit the jpeg files and save them again? Thats how you judge a camera of this class? Baffling

"The processor Sony seems to work with very efficient algorithms, superb control of noise and minimal loss of detail, much better than Nikon in this respect, increasing the sense of sharpness and overall contrast." - Photomagazine

Gordon Laing: “…the out-of-camera JPEGs from the A7 looked superior to the 5D3, at lower sensitivities anyway. In the 20-24 Megapixel class, I’d say the A7 is an excellent performer.”

Imaging Resource is even more emphatic: “Sony seems to have finally gotten a handle on their in-camera JPEG processing, to the extent that they now lead the field, in our estimation.”

just to be clear harold1968, you are suggesting that we are lying to our readers and probably breaking US laws? I'm sure the FTC would be very interested if you're right. Although if you are right, the guy further down the page who says we gave it an award because we want to sell more must be wrong... or maybe you're both right and it's a huge double-bluff!

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2014 at 07:19 UTC
On article Reminder: Vote now for your product of 2013 (62 comments in total)
In reply to:

timo: Boring.

'Clickbait', as someone said in another post.

And perhaps a desperate ploy to get Canon or Nikon back in the headlines ...

By publishing a poll that doesn't mention them? That's not desperate that's almost surrealistically subtle.

Link | Posted on Jan 18, 2014 at 17:42 UTC
In reply to:

peevee1: Looks like DPR staff is on vacations again, and old pre-prepared content is being gradually released to keep appearance of an active site.

erm, no.

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2014 at 20:56 UTC
On article Integrating the Apple MacBook Air into a pro workflow (346 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank C.: I wish DPR would spend more time reviewing cameras and lenses rather than worry about satisfying/plugging their sponsors, I miss the DPR of old with Phil Askey running the site... oh well I

i'm sure the 15 minutes spent looking at it will be recovered somehow.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2014 at 03:23 UTC
On article Integrating the Apple MacBook Air into a pro workflow (346 comments in total)
In reply to:

SergioSpain: Yet more free advertising for Apple, and they need it cause let's face it, they're a poor struggling company.

*Given this the only laptop review on DPR, done in a non-systematic way, and there are no plans to test any others.. then, yes, this screams advertorial. Its certainly generating a lot of click revenue.* - Jogger, this isn't a review, it's an article about travel photography workflow... and why is it a bad thing if content gets lots of interest / traffic? For us that's a good thing, though obviously only content that no one reads has any integrity. Finally, I'll say it again. Ethically, legally and by our own corporate policies, paid content (which we don't run) advertorials have to be clearly and prominently marked as such. Now either you genuinely believe us to be dishonest liars, or you're just making trouble. Which is it?

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2014 at 01:46 UTC
On article Integrating the Apple MacBook Air into a pro workflow (346 comments in total)
In reply to:

Frank C.: I wish DPR would spend more time reviewing cameras and lenses rather than worry about satisfying/plugging their sponsors, I miss the DPR of old with Phil Askey running the site... oh well I

well, we review a lot more cameras / lenses than in the 'good old days', we haven't had a penny in advertising from Apple since the days when Phil owned the site and this was written by a freelancer, thus had no effect on our core content. But yeah, you're right.

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2014 at 01:41 UTC
On article Integrating the Apple MacBook Air into a pro workflow (346 comments in total)
In reply to:

SergioSpain: Yet more free advertising for Apple, and they need it cause let's face it, they're a poor struggling company.

@ gerard: *Advertising: the activity or profession of producing advertisements for commercial products or services*.

How you can call links to other content we wrote to be 'disguised advertising' is literally beyond me.

Is there no difference to you between the cover of a magazine (or for that matter, the contents page) telling you what's inside and the paid, commercial ads?

Are there many content websites you visit that don't tell you about / have links to the content, or are they too all full of 'disguised adverts'?

Are all the links on the BBC News website to stories 'disguised adverts'? I just don't understand your comment.

Do we not have the right (or even duty) to tell visitors about editorial content we've produced that we think they might be interested in reading?

DPReview is MORE THAN JUST A FORUM!

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2014 at 21:32 UTC
On article Integrating the Apple MacBook Air into a pro workflow (346 comments in total)
In reply to:

SergioSpain: Yet more free advertising for Apple, and they need it cause let's face it, they're a poor struggling company.

do you consider every product we write about to be 'free advertising'? Do you apply the same logic when watching the news on TV? 'Argh! Yet more free advertising for Chris Christie'; 'How much did that snow pay to be on CNN???'. I notice you've never made the same complaint when we write about cameras.

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2014 at 20:16 UTC
On article Integrating the Apple MacBook Air into a pro workflow (346 comments in total)
In reply to:

lukx: Can you be honest and at the end of article mention that it was sponsored by Apple?

if it were we would be legally obliged to disclose that fact

Link | Posted on Jan 14, 2014 at 07:29 UTC
On article Challenge of Challenges: vote for the best shot of 2013 (121 comments in total)
In reply to:

Robert Soderlund: Fine looking photos, but all unrealistic and should be considered as art photography.

Photography is not just emotional or artistic art, it should also include truth, honesty, and documentary, and be able to show the world we live in, sometimes in the most true way possible.

maybe you should enter a challenge one day and show everyone how it's done!

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2014 at 18:24 UTC
On article Challenge of Challenges: vote for the best shot of 2013 (121 comments in total)
In reply to:

Leandros S: I'm going to boycoot this one as my personal favourites aren't here, and it feels a bit stupid being only allowed to vote for what the DPR team have deigned permissible. Condescending, too.

why? Do you really think people are going to look through over 1000 images? It's called a shortlist, it's what we always do, and i guess that's our prerogative.

Link | Posted on Jan 4, 2014 at 06:59 UTC
On article Happy Holidays from dpreview (114 comments in total)
In reply to:

Franco8: Happy Holidays. What happened to to Merry Christmas.

it says merry christmas twice in the article.

Link | Posted on Dec 29, 2013 at 07:51 UTC
On article Happy Holidays from dpreview (114 comments in total)
In reply to:

FoveonPureView: A blessed, godly Jesus Christmas! Just incase you're affraid of the C/J/G-words...

It's an annual competition to see who can first bring religion into the comments.

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2013 at 08:30 UTC
Total: 841, showing: 341 – 360
« First‹ Previous1617181920Next ›Last »