attomole

Lives in United Kingdom United Kingdom
Joined on Aug 9, 2006

Comments

Total: 322, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony a9: more speed, less dynamic range (636 comments in total)
In reply to:

HMeYe: I really don't see the point of this article : comparing the DR of A7rII with A9 is like comparing the DR between D810 and D5 !!!

Yes that's exactly wht it is like, but I don't see why that invalidates the article? if your buying into the Sony system it seems absolutely relèvent, Maybee in future a 10fps + stills camera can match a 5fps camera for noise and DR, but it's not this Sony that seems an important finding

Link | Posted on May 19, 2017 at 09:53 UTC
In reply to:

attomole: Almost completely pointless

"Almost" as I said. It has its specialist applications QED,, but how do you get a better view of somthing, it's static it collects information mostly away from the thing you want to look at, I can see it makes a simple solution, but for example an exhibit in a museum normally you would want to do. a 360 around it. not swivel on the spot and look around.
Nevertheless I am compelled by your advocacy I just don't see these being a must have Consumer device even for photographers and videographers

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2017 at 17:08 UTC

Almost completely pointless

Link | Posted on Apr 22, 2017 at 03:20 UTC as 7th comment | 5 replies
On article The Sony a9 is a 24MP sports-shooting powerhouse (1905 comments in total)

Could be one of those landmark Cameras like the Canon AE1 or the Nikon D3. whilst not revolutioanry, put enough of the right key new tech features together as to change the market
The real world focusing performance will be key, not something that frequently lives up to the hype.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2017 at 16:43 UTC as 298th comment | 1 reply
On article Nikon D7500 vs Nikon D500: Which is better for you? (393 comments in total)

610 and 750 are going to figure in this buying desision as well. Possibly more so based on the price.
I think Nikons mid to top end line up is excelent at least for stills.

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2017 at 15:07 UTC as 36th comment
In reply to:

Jim Evidon: For those who live in a bubble? I find the distortions in the demo video more than a little distracting. Aside from a possible scientific research tool or a novelty camera for those who have everything else and need the latest gadget, I see little application.

@steve ohlhaber
If I want to make myself sick iIwould rather just eat too many Easter Eggs or drink too much beer

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2017 at 12:14 UTC
In reply to:

Digimat: Hm...still looks like VHS Footage, and thoose stitching lines that cut fish in half are not pretty either. I think this technology has to go a long way until really usable.

Or has any reasonable real world application.

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2017 at 12:11 UTC
In reply to:

Astrotripper: People are often wondering who needs 8K.

This is the answer. Even 4K is not enough to make good quality 360 video. This looks pretty ok, much better than earlier attempts, but it is still some way from being actually good.

@Astrotripper, and its still pointless 360.

Link | Posted on Apr 11, 2017 at 12:09 UTC

Apple screwed up in this market and it's hanging by a thread of loyalty, one killer product is not the answer, as the trash can Mac demonstrated, it's quickly out of date, they seem to be doing the exact same with mackbook pro. The price is not such a big deal, perceived quality is ( and they have that in buckets) but sustainability and trust is not there, they lost the plot with pro apps and pro hardware.
They can still have this market but they need a committed strategy

Link | Posted on Apr 5, 2017 at 13:01 UTC as 79th comment | 4 replies
On article Leica SL gallery update (217 comments in total)
In reply to:

Irakly Shanidze: Please do not treat my statement as a personal attack, even if you really tempted to, but this collection of images is truly awful. It does a huge disservice to Leica, as it strengthens the common stereotype of a Leica user as someone who can just afford an expensive toy and has no idea how to use it. Please, please remove this, my hair aches when I look at these images.

Please do not treat my statement as a personal attack, even if you really tempted to, but this comment is truly awful. It does a huge disservice to Humanity as it strengthens the common stereotype of someone who can just afford an expensive education and has no idea how to use it. Please, please remove this, my hair aches when I read these words

Link | Posted on Feb 18, 2017 at 14:20 UTC
On article F is for '4th': Hands-on with Fujifilm X100F (424 comments in total)

It looks like a lot of the features people would like to see, wider, longer, faster lenses weather sealing, flip screen, are now on other models in Fuji's line up. and it makes more sense ro leave this model in this exact configuration, in a sweet spot of size, handling and retro aesthetic.
Fot what it is it's about spot on for me.

Link | Posted on Jan 19, 2017 at 07:41 UTC as 92nd comment | 1 reply
On article Woof! Sony a6500 sample images are here (365 comments in total)

Ok so quick look on a smartphone but, it's nailing the action, and that is the point right ? otherwise the 6000 will save you a metric shift ton of dosh with the same IQ.

Link | Posted on Nov 19, 2016 at 07:58 UTC as 34th comment

This should be part of DPR's standard set of tests.

Link | Posted on Nov 13, 2016 at 08:50 UTC as 27th comment | 1 reply

What is the point? I don't all all get 360

Link | Posted on Nov 12, 2016 at 09:54 UTC as 4th comment

Alternaitve caption " ifetch, Apple introduces dog control with amazing smart watch app"

Link | Posted on Nov 4, 2016 at 05:15 UTC as 5th comment
On article UPDATED: Sony RX100 Mark V real-world samples (275 comments in total)
In reply to:

photo perzon: The light in those pictures is stage light. Poor setup to evaluate.

looks like a Sony set-up, I was thinking the opposite, hats off to them for providing something that is a challenge for the camera.

Link | Posted on Oct 10, 2016 at 18:51 UTC
In reply to:

attomole: I haven't even seen an A6300 yet, There like rocking horse droppings as it is.

Show me more A6300's and it will make it appear at prices whereby I would take you up on that offer.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2016 at 02:41 UTC

I haven't even seen an A6300 yet, There like rocking horse droppings as it is.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 19:21 UTC as 138th comment | 2 replies

Given that the sensor is one of the best you can buy, stick a good lens on it and results should be as good as a D500 or close to, the rest of the specs have to be engineered to stop people buying it

Link | Posted on Sep 30, 2016 at 16:35 UTC as 6th comment

I have seen it in youtube I have changed my mind I want one it's obviously brilliant I don't care how bad it works.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 19:03 UTC as 24th comment
Total: 322, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »