 |  |  |  |  |
| Young Buck in a field of Goldenrod by kipsneddon from My Best Non-bird Photo of the Fortnight 13 | Little Blue Heron by krc2020 from Herons, Egrets, or Ibises | Life Strong by Nilesh Trivedi from Tell Your Story, persistence, & rebirth | No deal by Hooyat from Neither a lender or a borrower be | Female Yellow Dung Fly by mikero from Insect/Spider - macro only and no close-up |
I have published two examples of photos taken with my Canon SX10 and my Panasonic FZ1000. The photos are taken from the same location on a tripod. I set the cameras to their widest angle and used Aperture priority F8. The SX10 was set to ISO80 and the FZ1000 to ISO 125.
http://www.freshfordsomerset.co.uk/photosurvey_freshford.php
I was quite surprised that there wasn't a major difference between the two cameras.
vesa1tahti: Almost as impressive as my Canon SX50 HS.
Well I have just bought an FZ1000 and I have a Canon SX10 lens 28-560 (35 equivalent) bought 6 years ago. I am impressed by the FZ1000 but not that impressed. (the SX50 may be not be as good as the SX10. I will publish some pictures on my website for inspection.
What I have found is that the supplied software for the FZ1000 doesn't work properly on a PC running XP Pro. Full image when selected is out of focus! I thought it was me. But the images are fine viewing them with Windows Raw Image Viewer Actual Size. So it is the software that is suspect.