Kaso

Yeah. Even little things are better in the upper models (which cost more, of course). For example, I observe the following ranking in terms of mechanical operations of the fully articulated ...

You should be the first one to provide hard proofs. And who are you to want sonething from me? All these for-fun responses have started from your speculative claims. Why get so serious and ...

Absolutely. 40D, 50D: solid, carried over to 7D. 60D: huge drop, consumer-grade feel. 70D: upward recovery, firmer feel, but creaks and flexes beneath the right-hand grab. 80D: really good, solid ...

A low-end 24MP sensor of 2018 is not necessarily better than a high-end 20MP sensor of 2015. Plus, the sensor alone does not make the whole camera. The claims that, say, a 77D uses the same sensor ...

Yeah, are you tired of useless context-free absolute pronouncements? I wonder if the guy making such a statement owns five D500 bodies just because D500 is the best (of the best). Not sure about ...

Thanks for sharing. I visited Tokyo, Kyoto and Osaka many years ago, and do miss them. Just wondering... The first two images were shot at f/22. The remaining six were shot at f/2. You might have ...

And, at the same time, have you considered using EF-M mount adapter? In which ways specifically? (Severely cropped 4K cannot be considered "better".)

I use an 80D. I bought a T6s (77D's predecessor) for my daughter and sometimes use it. I recommend the 80D (especially given the bold condition you noted above). Reasons? See the two answers above. ...

wtfweird -- to you, obviously. Thousands of images (beautiful, to me *) created with 80D in the last few years, and not a single moment of feeling handicapped by the camera's features and buttons ...

+100 (The rest of what you wrote is excellent.)

Well, if they all performed at the same (high) level -- build-wise, feature-wise, IQ-wise -- there would be one model and one (high) price. :D In any event, enjoy your 7D Mark II as it is. I hang ...

Wherever I used "the," I meant "my copy of the." Also, understood is the subject "I," this one guy, this particular camera/lens user -- who could be the source of all problems. ;) Thanks for sharing.

I happen to agree totally with the above statement -- based on my EF-mount copy, of course.

As I said. As you said. Life goes on.

I use both lenses. (In general, I like and praise Sigma’s Global Vision lenses.) The Canon 55-250mm STM is consistently sharp throughout. The Sigma 50-100mm f/1.8 Art is inconsistently sharp — this ...

Great price, indeed. I'm sure you'll like this excellent and versatile zoom lens.

107 days to go yet

I went with Sigma 50mm f/1.4 EX, and then with Sigma 50mm f/1.4 Art, and keep both. I actually did not feel I need to upgrade, but I like Sigma in general and the Sigma Global Vision line in ...

The exact identifications of the various versions of this Canon lens are pathetic. I made it clearer to the OP (regarding the two latest versions ) by adding links and pictures. At least, it may be ...

First I want to confirm that you were referring to these two Canon lenses (the two most recent releases of the EF-S 18-135mm model): https://www.usa.canon.com/internet/portal/us/home/products/detai ...