Lives in United States United States
Joined on Oct 11, 2009


Total: 164, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

It means International Organization for Standardization.

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2018 at 03:41 UTC as 83rd comment

I find the four eye highlights in diamond pattern quite distracting.

Link | Posted on Jun 4, 2018 at 00:44 UTC as 3rd comment | 1 reply
On article Hands-on with Zeiss Milvus 25mm F1.4 (119 comments in total)
In reply to:

Reilly Diefenbach: The steady stream of giant f1.4 two pound hunks of glass continues unabated. How many one eye in focus portraits are going to be taken with a 25mm lens?

@T3 - if you are using the best of the modern lenses designed for high resolution across the frame at their maximum potential on a current high megapixel sensor, depth of field at the pixel level at portrait distances is about 1/4 that of a standard depth-of-field chart based on 8 x 10 prints based on my testing. And if you are seeking maximum resolution on a flat field (I have one ongoing project - not portraits - that requires this), you probably will need to go to f/4 or so to get the entire flat field in sharpest focus, because at larger apertures the sharpest point of focus won't be on the same flat plane across the field.

Link | Posted on Oct 29, 2017 at 03:34 UTC
In reply to:

lukaszj: The photos don't load... :/ I assume 1 minute should be enough.

i gave up after one took more than 10 minutes.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2017 at 23:52 UTC
On article First shots from new Nikon 28mm F1.4E ED (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

mxx: For those who wondered why people use 28 mm lenses:

"According to Marinkovic, he favors 28mm because it offers a wide field of view without being unnatural - allowing him 'to fit things into a frame without overflowing it or distorting the corner elements'. "

@HP1999 28mm takes in about 56% more image area at a given distance than 35mm. It's a pretty significant difference. 24mm more than double the image area of 35mm.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 16:55 UTC
On article First shots from new Nikon 28mm F1.4E ED (225 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dante Birchen: Pics look cooked. The guy is a Nikon Ambassador. So of course he is positive about the lens. I think I would prefer 35mm for most of these shots. We won't know the true quality of this lens until people start posting their cat pics and garden flowers.

With the D820. Can't tell anything with such a low resolution camera. Of course, you'll probably have to use f/2 or even f/2.8 with the 820to get enough DOF to get the entire eyelash in focus.

Link | Posted on Jun 1, 2017 at 16:41 UTC

Based on Nikon's MTF curves, they've substantially improved since the 24 and 35 f/1.4s in minimizing astigmatism and upping across-the-field resolution. Looks like a winner to me.

Now if they would just take on the 50 one more time, they could have a winner there as well.

Link | Posted on May 31, 2017 at 05:33 UTC as 34th comment | 6 replies

Looks like landscape mode to me.

Link | Posted on May 16, 2017 at 01:04 UTC as 8th comment
On article Nikon D7500 vs Nikon D500: Which is better for you? (412 comments in total)
In reply to:

avicenanw: Nikon did some serious twists and contortions to come up with this model by skipping the D7300 and D7400

ditto D400. This is the Nikon generation 5.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2017 at 21:48 UTC
On article Nikon D7500 vs Nikon D500: Which is better for you? (412 comments in total)
In reply to:

SmilerGrogan: Impossible to choose: The D500 finally, finally! has reasonable focus point coverage across the frame, while the D7500 offers the essential-for-me magical Nikon CLS. Can't afford both, may have to just drown myself in the Chattahoochee

CLS works fine on the D500, you just need a commander. I use the SU800, but one of the Nikon flashes with commander mode will also work. If you have or are going to the radio-controlled flash system, the D500 will be compatible with the remote adapter which also frees up your flash from the camera.

Link | Posted on Apr 17, 2017 at 21:46 UTC

One month of data does not a year make, but Nikon does need to get on the ball.

Link | Posted on Apr 15, 2017 at 03:30 UTC as 77th comment | 9 replies
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (916 comments in total)
In reply to:

Jacques Cornell: "Image quality compared to full frame"???
What, are the Fuji images cropped? They're not full frame? Does language mean anything any more?
You guys have drunk the marketing Kool-Aid: 35mm is not "full frame". Any image that's not cropped AFTER capture is "full frame". Duh.
The section should be titled "Image quality compared to 35mm." Sheesh.

I know what it means. Most other people on DPR know what it means. It means what it's meant since Olympus popularized the term "half frame" with the Pen cameras, and 24 x 36 thereafter became widely known and referred to as full frame. While the Pen cameras were first termed "single frame," that didn't last, and "half frame" stuck. No reason to stop using that term now - it's still a useful reference point for sensor sizes, crop factors, etc.

Now if you really want to attack a term that's confusing and misleading, why not take on "1-inch" sensors?

Link | Posted on Apr 6, 2017 at 04:50 UTC
In reply to:

xmeda: I like my Sig 100-300/4

100-400/5-6.3 is not worth existence. 60-300/4-5.6 FF lens would be more interesting both for APS-C and FF users.

At 1/3 stop slower, f/6.3 isn't a huge compromise with f/5.6 lenses provided the camera can AF at f/6.3. The size/weight advantages over an 80-400 f/5.6 are pretty significant here - I can see why someone would pick this if the image quality is good and the AF works well. Based on Sigma rep for C lenses, S version might be much better for AF if they bring one out, should still be more compact and less expensive than OEM 80-400s.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2017 at 01:23 UTC
In reply to:

DoubleDash: Available right after my holiday....:(

Love the price, thought it would be more expensive. But problably still >900euro's. EU is to expensive

@Impulses - Most states with sales/use tax require payment of tax on Internet sales if the vendor doesn't charge it. That's one reason it's so much trouble to buy from B&H - I have to keep track of everything myself so I can pay the sales tax at the end of the year. Some people I'm sure evade the sales tax on internet sales, but it's still a legal requirement.

Link | Posted on Mar 31, 2017 at 01:18 UTC
In reply to:

Paul B Jones: Easy. 800mm. I photograph wildlife. Reach is the main issue for me in the vast majority of photo situations. 800mm is the most reachy focal length. Therefore, 800mm.

I can accept that others might have a different choice, and that is okay.

And if you need a wide shot, you can just do a panorama and stitch in software. A very detailed panorama. So the 800 really is the do-everything lens.

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2017 at 14:33 UTC

Anything less than 256 gb and don't you need at least a half dozen for anything useful, like a day's work? How big are those Hasselblad 16-bit images anyway? It's like a roll of film, vs rolling your own.

Link | Posted on Mar 26, 2017 at 01:09 UTC as 10th comment | 1 reply
On article Throwback Thursday: Our first cameras (391 comments in total)

Kodak Brownie Holiday -> Kodak Signet 50 -> Honeywell Pentax H1 -> Nikon Photomic FTn

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2017 at 02:03 UTC as 102nd comment
In reply to:

Peak freak: The hitchhiking octopus for me. I haven't seen anything like it before (especially, the F.O.V) which immediately separates it from the others.
Number 12 (the steps) stands as an odd one out. While I can see the appeal, the actual content holds no tangible interest, which is important to me.

Light and shadow, yielding shape, pattern, repetition, texture, movement, composition - those are the "content" in 12. Things that attract the eye and light up the brain and evoke my response to this image. It's a level of abstraction from the physical things in the photograph.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2017 at 17:04 UTC
In reply to:

mikeodial: Can a new strap on an existing Nikon camera be news? I feel sorry for the journalists there trying to find a story amongst the "no new products". Perhaps a message for this segment of the industry.

It's not the strap that's news - it's the first line - "[No] new products." Of course, the strap contradicts that. The only quesion is, will the new product be for sale? And if not, is it really a new product? The photo does make the point, and quite nicely, thank you.

Link | Posted on Mar 4, 2017 at 00:52 UTC
On article Fotodiox Pro launches five GFX lens adapters (80 comments in total)

The 19 PC-E Nikkor should complement Fujifilm's lens range nicely - Perhaps Novoflex will do an adapter that controls the aperture.

Link | Posted on Feb 21, 2017 at 14:47 UTC as 4th comment | 1 reply
Total: 164, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »