Trubbtele

Trubbtele

Lives in Sweden Stockholm, Sweden
Works as a Mycologist
Joined on Dec 10, 2013

Comments

Total: 129, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
On article Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS sample gallery (154 comments in total)

Surprisingly bad!

Link | Posted on Jan 16, 2018 at 16:43 UTC as 35th comment | 2 replies

I had 2 Sony Xperia both crap :-(

Link | Posted on Jan 15, 2018 at 21:01 UTC as 1st comment
In reply to:

Pedro Oliveira: For me, the best are these:

https://deadcameras.com/

Nice!

Link | Posted on Jan 3, 2018 at 12:27 UTC
On article Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens (383 comments in total)

My Sigma 70mm EX do more fun with Anemone hepatica than a 135mm...

Link | Posted on Jan 2, 2018 at 18:32 UTC as 128th comment
In reply to:

Trubbtele: Sony Alpha a7R III vs Nikon D850
I have to much old Nikkor lenses for go over to Sony.
But I like what they try to do...

Thanks guys! And a happy christmas...

Link | Posted on Dec 25, 2017 at 16:09 UTC

Sony Alpha a7R III vs Nikon D850
I have to much old Nikkor lenses for go over to Sony.
But I like what they try to do...

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2017 at 16:38 UTC as 7th comment | 5 replies

They have a other culture in the USA than here in Europa.
You have bad guys in both places!
Happy Christmas to you all... :-)

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2017 at 16:29 UTC as 11th comment

Supercool!

Link | Posted on Dec 20, 2017 at 16:08 UTC as 10th comment

A**hole!

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2017 at 14:29 UTC as 42nd comment

Like it!

Link | Posted on Dec 3, 2017 at 18:16 UTC as 27th comment
On article First samples: Leica Thambar-M 90mm F2.2 (223 comments in total)

Silly buso...

Link | Posted on Oct 31, 2017 at 16:00 UTC as 39th comment
On article Hands-on with new Tamron 100-400mm F4.5-6.3 Di VC USD (79 comments in total)

Good with competition, the Sigma variant has been running over the summer. Unbelievably light and sharp for the money. OS is not the best, but the balance between camera (D500) and lens is very good so the OS is not necessary. If Tamron's 100-400mm is better then it will be sure to update :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 27, 2017 at 06:42 UTC as 8th comment
On article Nikon D850 Review (2112 comments in total)

Our customers do not care what camera brand we use. They want colors, details and so on, close to the reality of our research area. We have adapt Nikon's cameras after a huge tests, lenses we use is bespoked after our needs. D500 produce details that not even d810 can´t detect :-) I ordered 2 D850 bodies...

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2017 at 08:58 UTC as 65th comment
On article Take a look inside Leica's factory in Wetzlar, Germany (136 comments in total)

I have E. Leitz/Wetzlar lenses to my microscope from the 60s to 80s.
They are all extreamly well build and optically stunning :-)

Link | Posted on Oct 17, 2017 at 17:44 UTC as 26th comment
On article Nikon D850 added to studio scene comparison (464 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography Matters: This is my conundrum.

My biggest need/desire is low-light/high-ISO performance. That is where my D500 falls apart. It is wonderful in good light, but when >ISO3200 is needed, forget about it. The D850 is a significant improvement over previous D8XX camera--and at least matches the D750 when downsized--but I'm not sure if that's enough. Do I really need to go all the way to the D5 to get the high-ISO improvement that I crave? If so, will I miss the reach of the D500? Part of the allure of the D850 was its cropability, but if the crops have the same IQ as the D500, what's the point?

Brad Hill at Natural Art is comparing the D850 to D5 in the field currently (best to ignore his preliminary conclusions). I will put a lot of weight on his conclusions in deciding which way to go.

IIf you had read my comment correctly you did not have to answer ...

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2017 at 18:11 UTC
On article Nikon D850 added to studio scene comparison (464 comments in total)
In reply to:

Photography Matters: This is my conundrum.

My biggest need/desire is low-light/high-ISO performance. That is where my D500 falls apart. It is wonderful in good light, but when >ISO3200 is needed, forget about it. The D850 is a significant improvement over previous D8XX camera--and at least matches the D750 when downsized--but I'm not sure if that's enough. Do I really need to go all the way to the D5 to get the high-ISO improvement that I crave? If so, will I miss the reach of the D500? Part of the allure of the D850 was its cropability, but if the crops have the same IQ as the D500, what's the point?

Brad Hill at Natural Art is comparing the D850 to D5 in the field currently (best to ignore his preliminary conclusions). I will put a lot of weight on his conclusions in deciding which way to go.

I shoot a lot at ISO3200 raw, and zero negative issues...

Link | Posted on Sep 29, 2017 at 14:57 UTC
On article The Nikon D850 could be the only DSLR you’ll ever need (1100 comments in total)

A great thing with D850 is that price of D810 goes down :-)

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2017 at 18:50 UTC as 147th comment | 1 reply
On article The Nikon D850 could be the only DSLR you’ll ever need (1100 comments in total)
In reply to:

talmy: But my D810 is the only DSLR I'll ever need. Seriously, not replacing it with a D850.

D810 is a great camera :-)

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2017 at 18:35 UTC
In reply to:

Nano_Shutter: Canon should learn from the D850 ;)

And you are Troll!

Link | Posted on Aug 27, 2017 at 15:22 UTC

Looking forward to use it!

Link | Posted on Aug 24, 2017 at 09:27 UTC as 161st comment
Total: 129, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »