burritosandbeer

Put together from 4 shots, Cut River bridge in Michigan's Upper Peninsula at sunset.

So I have two kits, Serious Kit Think Tank turnstyle v2 10Lwith Panasonic G7 (soon to be a G85) Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8 ii Panasonic 35-100mm f/2.8 II Panasonic 100-300mm f/4-5.6 II Panasonic ...

$500 will get you a brand new mavic mini which is nearly as good as an original pro with the exception of strong wind performance. or add a few hundred dollars and do a mavic air 2, which is better ...

I love that lens, its the only prime that rides in my normal kit, and i have the two macro rings I use with it occasionally in there as well...  All of these are straight out of camera, no  crop ...

Was over in Grand Haven a few weeks back with a Panasonic G7.  It was a foggy day with almost no wind.  Pretty sweet being on the big lake on a day like that...

Buy Sony!

Not to make it harder, but the panny 12-35 and 35-100 2.8 zooms are actually really TINY. I carry those, the 42.5mm f/1.7 and the 100-300mm f/4-5.6 in a tiny 10l sling bag with all the other toys ...

Image was SOOC JPEG.  Overall I was pretty happy with the image personally but I have almost zero experience post processing and retouching.  I was looking for suggestions, and then folks asked ...

That makes me look psychotic  :-) Hmmm, might be too close to home....

Feel free

Shot in JPEG, feel free to see what you can do. thx

So I dont particularly like to be infront of the camera, but I wanted to try something. Set the camera to take 1 shot ever 3 seconds for 25 shots, then went infront of it to see how it would turn out.

I especially love #2 and D-Town!

Ok, I agree the 12-35 by itself is pretty slick, I just didnt have much luck with mine getting a good useful images with the extension. Shot same day on the 12-35mm f/2.8 II

So I suspect you are using some calculations here, but I dont have the experience with it to say much. What I can say is my 12-35 f/2.8 didnt take well to the macro tubes, if I had 26mm behind it ...

So with that info I would seriously suggest a 45-150 f4-5.6 to see if you like it and what you want that it doesnt do. The nice thing is it cheap, and can be had for very little in very nice ...

Can I ask you what you are looking to use it on and for? What body will this be on, what is your intended subjects? Reason I am asking is I have the 100-300f/4-5.6, the 45-150 f/4-5.6, and the ...

THIS! For any kid pics, family with kids, etc. I usually shoot 200-300 photos an hour for a group with kids as they run around, ham it up etc. Focus misses, metering mistakes, etc are the cost of ...

Atmospheric interference. So we think of air as invisible.  Truth is air carries particulates, has currents, and refracts light like any other fluid.  The more air between you and your subject, the ...

Using 16MP, I have several glossy prints at 16x20 and a few at 20x30 without visible pixelation issues.  They all look sharp as sharp to me. If you are printing on canvas you could probably even go ...