MaciekPruski

It does look like a very nice camera. Definitely it looks like a right tool for any professional or amateur photography job. I'm probably not going to buy one next year for the release price- too ...

Honestly I was just snapping casual kids photos, I didn't want to waste time setting everything up. It was a bright day though, and the shutter speed was 1/1000 sec so theoretically the camera ...

I honestly doubt this rumor. Anyway, it would be a good start to actually get the k-new released, we've been waiting forever. On the other hand I'd rather buy an updated KP with better video than ...

Yup, my KP seems to do this as well, I was shooting with DA 70mm the other day and it was choosing f3. 5 even though it was a sunny day. I had to go to aperture priority to step down

I wonder if it even gets released this year. Seems like there is quite little information or leaks about the final specs. Either they are going to suddenly release it right in time for Christmas ...

Also, the best smartphones do automatic frame stacking (for example Google's HDR+). The Pixels also offer "dual exposure" control where you can set exposure values for shadows and highlights ...

I wish camera companies would invest in sotware rather than developing more megapixels. Only a small minority would benefit in reality, and they can just buy a damn medium format camera and stop ...

My thoughts exactly.

You're right, However, for practical purposes the net result is te same- ie. you can view your jpeg on any device with more or less similar results while the way your RAW file "looks" will depend ...

That's a technicality, but for practical purposes a jpeg file is ready to be viewed by any image viewer software or printed and has a certain "look" built in- ie. all the curves applied, white ...

The RAW file is simply data from the sensor. It is not an image that is ready to be displayed. If you "see" a RAW image, you're actually seeing a jpeg preview created by software from the RAW ...

Honestly I'm satisfied by the performance of my KP. If there is something I would really like improved, it's definitely video (focus peaking during capture, some LOG mode, better codec, mic input) ...

I like the first one, well done

Seeing how long it takes to develop the new APSC flagship, chances of a new FF are rather slim.

Not great. The highlights in these pictures look quite bad, overall many higher-end smartphones give much better quality.

The sweet spot of Pentax is a compact, well-built DSLR with excellent controls (like the KP for example) and small, fast, 3d-pop primes with "character". And reasonable prices. I understand why ...

That's quite a weird choice of answers. Definitely reflected by the fact that almost half of the people used the "some combination" answer. I guess a lot of people simply expose for their subject, ...

I'm afraid that dynamic range won't be improved too much. I haven't noticed much improvement in this regard moving from K5iis to KP. Improved live view is something we can hope for. Generally focus ...

So... We all watched the video from Pentax. I'm curious what other Pentaxians think about the upcoming flagship. My thoughts: 1. Better OVF. Nice, that's definitely a welcome feature. We know it's ...

I used the Tamron 70-200 and on the K1 it does seem to force it into crop mode. There is some image quality loss but not horrible. I think I found some reviews where  they tested the sharpness with ...