Pixnat2

As long as they update the EM5 line, that's fine. It will make many people happy.

Personally speaking, I agree with you. I have no urge to upgrade my GM5 because it satisfy my needs for it. But the question is : does this make sense for a brand to remain stagnant in a fast ...

Actually, they meet all the priorities : fantastic IQ, great ergonomics, an amazing set of lens available, a standard size for their respective classes. Remember, Nikon never promised to built a ...

We'll be fixed in a few months, when Olympus will announce its next flagship. My bet is on an EM5 size, yours on an EM1 size, we'll see who's right, Have a good day. -- Cheers, Frederic http://www. ...

I have the 250 AW and use it for mirrorless and dslr. For a M43 setup, the 150 is enough, as you said. Awesome all weather sling bag, that is very confortable to wear and convenient in use.

Good observations. I agree that m4/3 should stay a verastile system with a lot of size choices. What make a lot of people upset is that they chose m4/3 for its compact size, and lately, Olympus and ...

Absolutely Ricardo. I hope Olympus won't make the same mistake one more time. But we know Olympus can be paradoxical.

Those "gimmicks" won't be able to justify high price. Most photographer don't use them and prioritze IQ/size/ergonomics/lenses availiablity to chose a system. Those are the fudamentals. Gimmicks ...

Prices of current high end m4/3 are down to face competition. That's a good 1st step. The Fuji XT3 (the real m4/3 competitor) is widely praised by reviewers as the best sub 35mm mirrorless cameras ...

I don't think so. He only tells that a small high end camera would make the system unique and very attractive for people looking for a portable solution to complement their larger setup. It's his ...

:-) I'm sure you're right about the screams. However, prices are dropping right now. Look at the X-T3, a high quality mirorrless praised in every review as the best sub FF camera on the market, and ...

The best business proposition is to be both : (1) a versatile system that stands on its own for those who want to shoot m4/3 only

IMHO, M. Hogan is spot on. m4/3 should focus on its strenghts, which is good IQ is a very compact system Today, a lot (probably a big share) of amateur/enthusiast photographers are multisystems users.

a proud swan a wandering cat a quiet gull and a special frog Just a bit of fun with the amazing X-T2 and 23mm f/1.4 :-) (there's even a hidden sparrow in one of the pics ;-) )

Image has always been part of communication. But cameras aren't tools made to communicate, like phones. If you can't understand it, no need to communicate anymore... Oh well...

What you are missing is that a phone is a communication tool with an imaging function and a camera is an imaging tool with no communication function. Two different tools for two different jobs. Try ...

... don't go for a 16Mpix Fuji, it will bring nothing more than your GX8 do already. Instead, spend a bit more on a used 24 Mpix Fuji camera (X-T20 or better an XE3). The X-T10 will be a waste of ...

Agree! Yes! I hope not. I sincerely hope that no camera maker will ever do it. Phones for instant sharing (like fast food), cameras for slower photo process (like slow food in a good restaurant). O ...