slick83

Lives in Czech Republic Czech Republic
Joined on Oct 5, 2010

Comments

Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Canon EOS 5D IV: What you need to know (185 comments in total)

The Canon EOS 5D-->> Mark II<<-- uses the very familiar LP-E6N battery, rated at 900 shots per charge (CIPA).

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2016 at 14:13 UTC as 50th comment
On article Canon EOS 5D IV: What you need to know (185 comments in total)

That molding line on the EOS 5D -->>Mark II's<<-- pentaprism might look like the camera boasts a built-in flash, but it doesn't.

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2016 at 14:09 UTC as 51st comment | 2 replies

How about 35mm eq. lens instead of palette swap? :)

Link | Posted on Feb 16, 2016 at 08:28 UTC as 31st comment
On article History Repeating: Olympus PEN-F Review (1070 comments in total)

I like it. Hope they will make the front dial customize-able in the future FW update though.

Link | Posted on Jan 27, 2016 at 07:14 UTC as 328th comment

Why isn't this news post highlighted on the main page in any perceivable way I wonder ?

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2015 at 05:10 UTC as 16th comment
On article Making 'Art': We go inside Sigma's lens factory (194 comments in total)

Thank you very much, indeed! Next time, could we get the whole story on a single page, please?

Link | Posted on Mar 10, 2015 at 08:31 UTC as 34th comment
On article A closer look at the Nikon Coolpix P900 megazoom (194 comments in total)

Not part of the target audience but, for some, it might just be the only camera they will ever need.

Link | Posted on Mar 3, 2015 at 09:29 UTC as 39th comment | 1 reply

Ultimate Selfie @5:46 :-D

Link | Posted on Jun 16, 2014 at 08:24 UTC as 5th comment
On article Lensbaby releases 5.8mm F3.5 circular fisheye lens (20 comments in total)

"Polished internal barrel for creative flare & reflection"

Oh boy ..... :-(

Link | Posted on Apr 14, 2014 at 09:51 UTC as 6th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

moimoi: It is quite inconspicuous, isn't it?

@KariIceland:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-lCuTuh-Twpw/Ud3MYNcM0PI/AAAAAAAANzQ/_d6gly9h_OU/s1600/gta-the-joke.gif

:-)

edit:typo

Link | Posted on Dec 18, 2013 at 14:50 UTC
On article Canon Korea teases new camera, EOS M2 or SL1/100D? (257 comments in total)

White colour version of SL1/100D in 10 ... 9... 8 ...

Link | Posted on Nov 11, 2013 at 16:56 UTC as 34th comment

Finally!, no finger-print-ugliness will ruin my otherwise flawless image.

Link | Posted on Sep 5, 2013 at 07:49 UTC as 41st comment

fools and their money are easily parted

Link | Posted on Jul 23, 2013 at 06:56 UTC as 127th comment
In reply to:

falconeyes: 20-1200 mm F/16-33

and according to optyczne.pl, it isn't even sharper at F/33 than F/47.

Can't see any other application than bright daylight video from a tripod ...

... in full frame terms, perhaps?

Link | Posted on Jul 19, 2013 at 13:38 UTC
On article Carl Zeiss drops 'Carl', becomes 'ZEISS' (111 comments in total)

Carl would not be happy about it. Just sayin ...

Link | Posted on Jul 2, 2013 at 11:59 UTC as 14th comment
In reply to:

Combatmedic870: Im guessing looks just like the 700D and 60D and 7D and 600D and...EOS M*shrugs*

Please elaborate. Thank you.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2013 at 07:29 UTC
On article Pro DSLRs, Pro Photographers (126 comments in total)

Thank you very much DPR. This is the best feature to date I have ever read on DPR Keep up the good work. Thanks again.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2013 at 12:08 UTC as 39th comment
On article Pentax launches WG-3 and WG-3 GPS waterproof cameras (66 comments in total)

I hope since the last generation they have fixed the following:

"Avoid contact with garbage, mud, sand, dust, water, toxic gases or salts. These could cause the camera to breakdown. Wipe the camera to dry off any rain or water drops"

source -> http://c758710.r10.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/support/manual/1330537010_Manual_WG-2_EN_official.pdf

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 11:49 UTC as 15th comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

slick83: Since I am in the market for rugged compact camera that will survive mu busy urban/rural life. I took my time to check Nikon's site for some details.

According to Nikon site:

-= Waterproof =-
* on camera body itself 18m/59ft:
http://cdn-4.nikon-cdn.com/en_INC/o/ET360lcITrS5AL5UdjBwI83CY_Y/Views/26412_AW110_front.png

* in specs sheet:
JIS/IEC protection class 8 (IPX8) equivalent (under our testing conditions)
Up to a depth of 5 m (16.4 ft) and for 60 minutes

link -> http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Compact-Digital-Cameras/26412/COOLPIX-AW110.html

Hmmm, I wonder, is it really 18m/59ft ?

OK, since AW110 user manual is not published, yet, I have looked into user manual of its predecessor [AW100] and it goes like this:

-= Notes on waterproof and dust-proof performances =-
The camera is equivalent to IEC/JIS waterproof grade 8 (IPX8) and IEC/JIS dustproof
grade 6 (IP6X) and enables shooting pictures underwater at a depth of 10 m (33 ft)
for up to 60 minutes.*

This rating does not guarantee the waterproof performance of the camera or that
the camera will be free from damage or trouble under all conditions.

* This rating indicates that the camera has been designed to withstand the specified water pressure
for thespecified period of time when the camera is used according to the methods defined by
Nikon.

link -> http://www.nikonusa.com/pdf/manuals/kie88335f7869dfuejdl=-cww2/AW100EN.pdf

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2013 at 06:59 UTC
In reply to:

slick83: Since I am in the market for rugged compact camera that will survive mu busy urban/rural life. I took my time to check Nikon's site for some details.

According to Nikon site:

-= Waterproof =-
* on camera body itself 18m/59ft:
http://cdn-4.nikon-cdn.com/en_INC/o/ET360lcITrS5AL5UdjBwI83CY_Y/Views/26412_AW110_front.png

* in specs sheet:
JIS/IEC protection class 8 (IPX8) equivalent (under our testing conditions)
Up to a depth of 5 m (16.4 ft) and for 60 minutes

link -> http://www.nikonusa.com/en/Nikon-Products/Product/Compact-Digital-Cameras/26412/COOLPIX-AW110.html

Hmmm, I wonder, is it really 18m/59ft ?

@hydrospanner

Have you even read my post, sir?
Or is it like that simply because there is no "IPX9-10-11-12" rating to they use IPX8 instead?

What I point out is the obvious difference in numbers they published.

The number printed on the camera body is different than the one "printed" in the specs sheet on their own web site.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2013 at 15:41 UTC
Total: 21, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »