|
mrb375 |
NY, United States
Comments
 |  |  |  |
| Wild American Flamingos by Fotorequest from Flamingos Unlimited | No Space Race Here by Nilesh Trivedi from Empty spaces in the city | _MG_5014 by tim and jan from Cruise Liners | Two Surfers by JeffryZ from Reflections on the Shore |
|
|
mrb375 |
| | | |
| Wild American Flamingos by Fotorequest from Flamingos Unlimited | No Space Race Here by Nilesh Trivedi from Empty spaces in the city | _MG_5014 by tim and jan from Cruise Liners | Two Surfers by JeffryZ from Reflections on the Shore |
What's wrong with the nail polish method?
My answer? BRUCE GILDEN
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkIWW6vwrvM
What- no reflective puddles?
Will this lens work with the fuji tele adapter 1.4?
Looks good. I have a set of Carl Zeiss Jena lenses in M42 which should shine with some Ektar or Ferrania P30 loaded up. I grew up with film, and hate getting gouged for CLA and repairs which almost equal the full price of this Reflex. If you love digital, stay digital. But I hedge my bets with both digital and film.
“I ceased to advertise my mother’s race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.”
Obama
mrb375: Good News- Their stuff absolutely rocks.
Bad News- They are wacky, tree-hugging, latte-sipping, San-Fran Snowflakes.
But their stuff is excellent.. so patronize them. Could care less about their wacky politics. I even still listen to Moby on Spotify, and he's just as wacky..politically speaking. I'm no hate monger, Astro Boy.. just a realist.
Nomoreheroes: I have the old leash and find it to flaccid
maybe it's not in the mood...
Good News- Their stuff absolutely rocks.
Bad News- They are wacky, tree-hugging, latte-sipping, San-Fran Snowflakes.
Malikknows: Lovely video and description. The user experience -- joy of use and ownership -- seems to be what truly sets the Q apart from other offerings.
I use an A6000 with a manual focus Voigtlander for street and travel photography but I think a Q is in my future.
I also use a Sony Nex7 with CZJ Flektogon. A Q would be awesome...
Have a shootout with Olympus 50mm 1.4, Takumar 1.4 and Carl Zeiss Jena 35mm 2.4 and lets see what you get.
New York Knicks 7' center Wilson Chandler also enjoys photography
David Grant: Always inspiring and instructive to see the work of a great photographer. And Steve McCurry is indeed a great photographer.
Thank you, Mr. McCurry, for getting me into photography after my stint in the US Army- where an Olympus OM-2 was purchased from the PX. Your shot was (and still is) awesome.
mrb375: I have switched to Nikon and Sigma.. but the current E-5 and 12-60 lens is very nice. The 4/3rds sensor (however) tends to blow out highlights and has less in RAW for shadows.
I've owned OM, EP-x, E-420, 520, 620, and E-30. All perform *decent* but lose out to APS-C & FF.
I guess what I mean is, if the buyer has $1100 to spend, the best choice would be a Nikon D7000 over the EM-5. If you look at the costs of m4/3rds lenses- again Nikon wins.
mrb375: I have switched to Nikon and Sigma.. but the current E-5 and 12-60 lens is very nice. The 4/3rds sensor (however) tends to blow out highlights and has less in RAW for shadows.
I've owned OM, EP-x, E-420, 520, 620, and E-30. All perform *decent* but lose out to APS-C & FF.
The new EM-5 looks like a nice piece, but I like the flexibility of Nikon more. Why Olympus fervently continues with 4/3's and m4/3rds is beyond me. They have to grow or (unfortunately) die.
I have switched to Nikon and Sigma.. but the current E-5 and 12-60 lens is very nice. The 4/3rds sensor (however) tends to blow out highlights and has less in RAW for shadows.
I've owned OM, EP-x, E-420, 520, 620, and E-30. All perform *decent* but lose out to APS-C & FF.