Petteri Sulonen
Lives in
Finland
Joined on
Mar 16, 2002
|
Comments
 |  |  |  |  |
| Johan Willem Friso by I am Legend from Macro - Money | The Gateway of India - Mumbai by AKHS from departures.india | Perth. Australia by Nilesh Trivedi from Your City - Through a Window | Macro fly by dbwelds from A bugs life | Hovering by anisah from My Best Photo of the Week |
In-depth testingLatest Camera Reviews
Beyond the studio testsFeature Articles and Videos
PIX VideosTalks, demos and panels
711The Canon that canCanon EOS 80D Review
372Touchscreen street shooterFujifilm X70 Review
2164Upwardly mobileSony a6300 Review
339Power ZoomPanasonic Lumix ZS100/TZ100 Review
2501Retro through-and-throughFujifilm X-Pro2 Review
401Inching forward? Canon PowerShot G5 X Review
177Bag ReviewPeak Design Everyday Messenger
333Can we get much wider?Canon EF 11-24mm F4 L USM gallery
2228FeatureWhat is equivalence?
Speed BoostSony SLT-A77 II Review
717Mono a monoLeica Monochrom (Typ 246) hands-on
48ArticleTo St. Helens and Back: Olympus TG-Tracker Shooting Experience
541ArticlePanasonic Lumix DMC-GX8 review
210VideoCapturing nature with the Canon EOS 7D Mark II
Two in oneLG G5 camera review
1140In-depth ReviewLeica Q
Ready, SteadySony Alpha 7 II Review
Cipher9250: will the wide conversion lens for x100 work on the x100s thanks
Yes.
Greg Gebhardt: The biggest advantage the X100S has is it is cheaper. As far as image quality and detail the RX1 will always win. Those who do not agree are in denial and likely are regretful Fuji owners. Lol.
No viewfinder, no sale.
The idea has potential though. Just needs more source pixels and a bigger sensor for more DOF control.
If you used the 41 MP one from the new Nokia, it'd be a whole different beast. I bet you could get quite decent focusable 3-4 MP pics from that.
Yomama: To be honest, The short flange focal distance of the nex is what makes it so difficult for them to produce decent fixed primes that are not bigger/longer then it needs . It's pure physics, small body (with short FD)=bigger lenses (NEX), normal body (with normal FD)=normal lenses (Fuji & Samsung), and big body (with long FD)=small lenses (Pentax).
The market is longing for faster pancake lenses with high IQ..... Sony will have a hard time doing so. M43 seems to be hitting the sweet spot with the size of the body and collection of lenses. I also think Pentax K-01 will do a lot better than we think.
Please do the math of adding up the lenses length of Sony's 16mm (23mm), 24mm (66mm) & 50mm (62mm) and compare to Pentax's 21mm (25mm), 40mm (15mm), 70mm Ltd (26mm)........ Ouch Sony. Ouch
Fuji's flange focal distance is slightly shorter than Sony's (17.7 mm, Sony is 18). [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lens_mount ]
This makes no sense to me. Why shackle themselves to the K-mount, with its long flange-sensor distance? They could've introduced a new mount optimized for mirrorless, and provided a fully-functional, electronic K-mount adapter for legacy lenses, like Nikon did with the 1 system.
No more button lock while writing. That settles it, count me in.
Also, I have it on good authority that the NEX 7 has cooties.