Photomonkey

Lives in United States CA, United States
Works as a Photographer
Joined on Oct 28, 2002

Comments

Total: 973, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (905 comments in total)
In reply to:

Arkienkeli: One thing often, or always forgotten, is that smaller sensor cameras (meaning FF in this case...) actually beat MF sensor cameras in low light because much faster lenses are available for them. MF sensor does gather 50% more light than a 135 size sensor, that is true, but a f/1.4 lens will let 200% more light to the sensor than a f/2.8 lens, typical for MF bodies. The end result is 150% better low light performance for FF, whole system considered.

While the new Fuji seems to be a decent enough camera, I'll stick with D800e and the huge selection of fast and sharp lenses for it.

That is also true for µ43 yet people insist on talking about "light gathering" of the acreage of FF or MF.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 20:32 UTC
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (905 comments in total)
In reply to:

miles green: GAS fizzles away as I compare with the K-1 pixel-shift samples... I especially like the lack of moire artifacts from PS files. Of course MF is untouchable for applications like studio portraiture.

Only if your studio portraiture is printed to 30x40inches and up.
Not if smaller or on canvas.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 20:31 UTC
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (905 comments in total)
In reply to:

Sid911: Why didn't Fuji use X-Trans sensor in this body?

The cost to implement the fabrication was too great for such a small run.
I also suspect that the RAW processing is far easier and more widely supported for Bayer.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 20:30 UTC
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (905 comments in total)
In reply to:

Indohydra: is it true that both the Pentax and Fuji are using a Sony sensor? (What about Hasselblad?) That seems to be the implication on this board. If that is the case it would seem that Sony will release its own MF format camera if and when it figures out if there is a market.

Sony probably makes more money selling the sensors than having to invest in a totally new system that will enter a saturated market.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 18:21 UTC
On article Fujifilm GFX 50S Review: Modern MF (905 comments in total)

GFX is excellent but the 5DS R mkII will be very close.
I can wait.

Link | Posted on Mar 13, 2017 at 18:19 UTC as 204th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

cosinaphile: ive paused the video to add to this discussion .... always the most interesting part of any dpreview article

fungus was mentioned already ... it take literally millionths of a gram of a growth medium to begin nourishing a fungal spore on a petri dish or a lens element .. the flour on the camera , as adorable as it is , is a recipe for disaster [ npi] as this camera and its lenses are not environmentally sealed , [not s ure that would even help here ] there is already plenty of food, microscopically distributed, for a lens infection to potentially occur , .......imho

....back to the video

Fungus on lens surfaces are the problem over time. Sealing the innards cannot solve that problem.

Link | Posted on Mar 7, 2017 at 17:03 UTC
In reply to:

techjedi: If they really want people to think about medium format differently, just price this camera like a full frame camera. It will be one of the best selling camera launches of all time. No idea what the margin is on a camera like this, but it feels like they could still make money at around $3500 for body and keep lens prices as they are expecting.

The public estimates of costs are always sorely off base.
THAT is why the average small business goes out of business.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2017 at 02:06 UTC
In reply to:

khurtwilliams: Interesting that cameras keep getting better but the quality of photographers gets worse.

I actually like the images as they represent what most of the world is shooting. If I really need pixel peeping exercises with lens charts, I go elsewhere.

Link | Posted on Feb 25, 2017 at 02:04 UTC
In reply to:

Richard Schumer: I owned an Asahiflex I, which I bought used in 1957, when I was 14 years old. The slow f:3.5 lens wasn't fast enough (this in the days before Tri-X) for available-light shooting, so I traded it for a Pentacon with F:2 Biotar, and found the eye-level prism finder much better than either the waist-level reflex finder or the eye-level optical finder without focus aid of the A'flex. When I visited Japan in 1966, I bought a black Spotmatic with its f:1.4, 8-element "radioactive" lens (wonderful!) and used it until the K-mount was introduced, at which time I traded it for an ME. That kit was stolen, so I tried a Nikon F, but it didn't feel as well-made as Pentaxes nor did it fit my hands as well. After a few years, I traded it for another ME, which I used until the *ist DS was introduced; that was replaced by a K10D, which I still use. About the same time, I acquired a 645 with four lenses for film use.

I guess that makes me a long-time Pentaxian!

I bought my H3V used when I was 14. Must appeal to us teenagers.

Link | Posted on Feb 23, 2017 at 02:00 UTC
On article Nikon PC Nikkor 19mm F4E sample gallery (87 comments in total)
In reply to:

eno2: To bad it costs a fortune. :(

For those using it for business it makes money. There may not be too many of those sales but at the price , Nikon makes money

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2017 at 16:42 UTC
On article Nikon PC Nikkor 19mm F4E sample gallery (87 comments in total)
In reply to:

daciangroza: Too late.
Everybody who shoots architecture has been doing so for years with the Canon 17mm TS. After 10 years of using Nikon gear I switched to a Sony body and Canon tilt shifts.
The Canon is about $1200 cheaper and 2mm wider.
Nikon shows an unclear design direction too: They moved the little switch that flips the shift mechanism sideways to the other side of the lens. Like it is on Canon. Now if you have a 24mm pc-e and a 19mm pc-e the switches will be on opposite sides. Confusing. I agree with the new location, it's more comfortable to use. But it should have been like that from the beginning, on all shift lenses.
Does the shifted lens still hit the pop-up flash of every camera that has one?

While I agree that the Canon may be a better value I have to say that Nikon did the right thing in bringing out this lens.
I use my 17TS-E almost daily and it paid for itself on the first job. The Nikon might take two jobs but it will be worth it.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2017 at 16:41 UTC
On article Nikon PC Nikkor 19mm F4E sample gallery (87 comments in total)
In reply to:

digilux: Nice, although a bit soft. It lacks real sharpness (like my PC-E 24mm). I wonder, is it that better compared to corrected (in PS) images from a prime lens ? And is it's price justified in that regard?

Using Live View simplifies the focusing.

Link | Posted on Feb 20, 2017 at 16:38 UTC

For all the "advice" posted here about what Nikon or any other camera manufacturer should do it seems obvious that the posters are unaware of the high costs of development and the uncertain markets the planners have to contend with.

It is always easy to be an armchair engineer and make pronouncements but sadly the real world doesn't work out that way.

Link | Posted on Feb 13, 2017 at 17:50 UTC as 224th comment | 7 replies
In reply to:

Leonp: Said that it's the Seattle rooftop test setup that I like the most, I don't really understand lens sample galleries anymore. Lenses of the same category (price, length, speed) are are that equally good that even in a test setup it's mostly hard to distiguish between them.

Shhhh. Don't say that. What will we do if we can't scream our tribe's favorite cliches?

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2017 at 02:37 UTC
In reply to:

Kiwisnap: A shame that this comes just as my debate is actually whether to move away from DSLR and into mirrorless...!

@arbux, Yes you can because the world is not all about the minimal DOF.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2017 at 02:34 UTC
On article Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art DxO results: a new king is crowned (249 comments in total)
In reply to:

Fred Joseph: Measured focal length of 79.7mm???? What does that mean? Is the lens short-changing the owner by 5mm?

I had often seen a measured FL in lens tests way back in the 70's. Generally the FL was very close to the marked value.
However when it comes to zooms my experience has been that they can diverge from marked values dramatically. After noting this I was scolded by a number of people that said "of course they do, shut up".
My response to that is if my Tamron 28-75 actually measures 28-60, they should mark it as such.
Of course AFAIK there is no requirement that lens makers mark the lenses realistically.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 20:28 UTC
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cameracist: No one complains about luxury sport cars (they are uncomfortable, expensive and difficult to operate and you cannot transport your family with them); the exact opposite is true. Even people who cannot afford them put their pictures on their desktop background.

But when a camera maker does something similar, people on the internet whine all the time.

AdamKozlowski, my comments are not meant to be snark. I am a full time professional and have owned Leica since my first M4 in 1973.

My point is that the joy is in the use of the camera just as a Porsche owner delights in their car while stuck in L.A. traffic.

And yes, today people do stop and ooh about my camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 2, 2017 at 14:52 UTC
On article Sigma 85mm F1.4 Art sample gallery updated (94 comments in total)

While some may carp about CA, the real test would be side by side against another 85. Easy to be snarky in a comparison free environment.

Link | Posted on Jan 25, 2017 at 15:13 UTC as 31st comment | 1 reply
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

Cameracist: No one complains about luxury sport cars (they are uncomfortable, expensive and difficult to operate and you cannot transport your family with them); the exact opposite is true. Even people who cannot afford them put their pictures on their desktop background.

But when a camera maker does something similar, people on the internet whine all the time.

Super luxury cars do for cars what Leica does for cameras.
In a super luxury car you can still feel the quality of the vehicle when stuck in traffic. When you get to the office people admire your car.
With a Leica you can feel the quality when you take pictures of your cat. When you get to the office, people admire your camera.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2017 at 15:41 UTC
On article Leica M10 real-world sample gallery (345 comments in total)
In reply to:

IvanM: mmmm downloaded and processed raw image 20 in LR and I must say there is nothing more I see here that i cant get from my regular common and garden variety camera...But of course I dont know what aperture was used or if there was a bit of camera shake etc etc...i did notice that the shadows pushed to +100 in LR was noisy but it could be cleaned up and nice HL recovery...the problem with images like these is that not knowing the capability of the photographer etc etc its really difficult to come to a conclusion....but the overall quality of this specific image is nothing special...

I feel virtually every RAW file form any APS-C camera and above made in the last 5 years would give the same result.

The "I was blown away" statement I see all too often is hyperbole.

Link | Posted on Jan 23, 2017 at 15:38 UTC
Total: 973, showing: 81 – 100
« First‹ Previous34567Next ›Last »