nawknai

Lives in Australia Australia
Works as a Medical physicist
Joined on Oct 30, 2007

Comments

Total: 347, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »

I'm a huge fan of bags, and own lots of them. I don't mean camera bags, but all bags. I'm a guy, and I'm not overly trendy otherwise, but I like bag design.

With that declared, I'll say this about "messenger" bags: The flaps are usually a issue for camera bags because they prevent you from reaching your camera quickly. That, and flaps on some bags are too long. If you include a flap, it needs to be shorter.

I understand that a flap is generally regarded as being more weather resistant than simply using a zipper, but I'd personally rather have a zipper anyway. I know people don't like them because plastic zippers feel cheap, while metal zippers may scratch your gear. However, a waterproof zip may work for some people.

Personally, I don't have a camera bag anymore. My X100 sits in its hard-case, and I wear it across the shoulder. Same goes for my X-Pro1, and if I bring another lens, I keep it in whichever man-bag I'm carrying.

EDIT: The Roma has a good accessible opening!

Link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 12:35 UTC as 25th comment | 3 replies
In reply to:

Dazzer8888: I'd be curious to know: does it say "Leica" on the outside? If so, it would seem to be a bit of a theft magnet. If not, then i might get one for my sony A7! ;)

You can get one for the A7, but the regular Berlin is the same bag, except without the red interior. I guess it doesn't matter whether it's the "Leica Edition" or not. It's really a matter of how much you like red.

Enjoy. ;)

Link | Posted on May 21, 2015 at 12:21 UTC
In reply to:

falconeyes: If you switch over to DPR's report about Sony supplying 40% of all sensors now, you'll find the reason for this.

This article mentions that after Sony inked the iPhone6 contract, it is unable to supply enough sensors to other vendors, including HTC, Samsung and others. It was in the news already, folks ...

BTW, it ethically absolutely correct to use multiple sources for a consumer procduct for anything but a products core component. So, for a car you can vary windshiled manufacturers but not the engine. And for a smart phone, you can of course vary the camera module supplier. But the same wouldn't apply to a system camera.

I'm just glad that the people who believe this is grounds for a lawsuit aren't actually lawyers, and don't know anything of the law.

Link | Posted on May 9, 2015 at 00:51 UTC
In reply to:

Luke Kaven: Samsung isn't off the hook by saying that their "specifications" are generic enough that both camera modules satisfy it.

The question here is whether reviews, based on the superior camera module, induce false consumer expectations of quality, used as incentive to buy, when the final product may or may not match those expectations. Would the inferior camera module have earned a number 1 rank in the reviews or merely a number 2 or 3?

Keep firmly in mind here: it doesn't matter whether you or I care one way or another. For better or worse, you can expect a thousand lawyers to be suiting up for this one as we type.

They never guaranteed you a particularly manufacturer for the camera, so as long as they didn't rig reviews by ensuring that all reviewers got a Sony, I don't think they'll need their lawyers.

If someone bought an S6 or Edge because of what they thought was definitely a Sony sensor, then that's their own assumption that wasn't quite right.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2015 at 21:17 UTC
In reply to:

Just a Photographer: Its a large marketshare but it is actually less then I had expected it to be.

Actually, that wouldn't be a monopoly, technically speaking. ;) Even if Sony had 80% of the market, they still wouldn't have a monopoly.

Monopolies are strongly discouraged, but having a large marketshare on its own doesn't make one a monopoly. Ikea doesn't have a monopoly, and yet in some markets, they own it.

Link | Posted on May 5, 2015 at 09:14 UTC

Really? I always figured their share to be well over 50%. :O

Canon takes a bite, Panasonic takes a small bite, Samsung takes an even smaller bite, and then there are companies like Aptina.

Link | Posted on May 5, 2015 at 09:11 UTC as 8th comment | 4 replies
On photo ISO3200_P1000106_WH in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (1 comment in total)

After seeing several ISO 6400 photos, I think ISO 3200 is probably the max you'd want to use.

That's still incredible for a phone though. I'm a fan. May need to get one for myself.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 11:56 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Panasonic Lumix CM1 sample gallery sample gallery (1 comment in total)

After seeing several ISO 6400 photos, I think ISO 3200 is probably the max you'd want to use.

That's still incredible for a phone though. I'm a fan. May need to get one for myself.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 11:56 UTC as 1st comment
On a photo in the Panasonic Lumix CM1 sample gallery sample gallery (2 comments in total)

The photo is keepable if you wanted to.

Doesn't sound like much praise, but it's actually a huge compliment.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 11:54 UTC as 1st comment
On photo ISO6400_P1000089_WH in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

The photo is keepable if you wanted to.

Doesn't sound like much praise, but it's actually a huge compliment.

Link | Posted on Apr 25, 2015 at 11:54 UTC as 1st comment
On article Apple patent hints at super resolution camera mode (77 comments in total)
In reply to:

They call me Hans: I shutter (no pun intended) to think how much the phone that employs this will cost...

It's shudder. No pun for you!

And iPhones already cost a lot! I think that the entire "smart"phone idea has lost a lot of steam, and the camera is one of the few places where a company can try to differentiate itself.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2015 at 08:56 UTC
On article Apple patent hints at super resolution camera mode (77 comments in total)
In reply to:

digiart: I may be wrong but it looks like Apple is yet again copying other companies technology...

Actually, I think they're copying another company's idea. Even if Olympus isn't the first to do it, they should be considered the company who brought the idea back from the dead and popularized the idea once again.
Apple hadn't heard of it before, but when they did (because Olympus was in the news...), they thought it was a great idea, and figured out a slightly different method to produce the same thing.

Uh....or something.

Link | Posted on Apr 23, 2015 at 21:20 UTC
In reply to:

GabrielZ: I think the new APS-C sensor is the one heading for the rumored Fujifilm X-Pro2! Here's hoping, looking forward to that camera a lot, as an X-E2 user myself.

Fuji uses Sony sensors. It's just the colour filter that's Fuji's own design.

Link | Posted on Apr 19, 2015 at 20:30 UTC
In reply to:

PerL: Weight 586 g = combined with a m43 Olympus OM-D E-M1, 497g
= 1.080 g

And as comparison:

Nikon 20 1,8G, 357g, combined with a FF Nikon D750, 750g
= 1.107 g

"...lightness is supposed to be the main advantage of a smaller sensor system, right?"

Who said that?

I bought my Fuji X100 because it's small and lightweight. I didn't buy my X-Pro1 because it's lighter and smaller than a DSLR.

Link | Posted on Apr 3, 2015 at 23:30 UTC
Total: 347, showing: 61 – 80
« First‹ Previous23456Next ›Last »