Rihass

Joined on Feb 25, 2016

Comments

Total: 203, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

Can't get passed that ugly stock android. Google has the power to make ugly software. I love android and never see myself using IOS, well, because of its limitations. Good thing we have launchers.

Link | Posted on Oct 8, 2021 at 00:57 UTC as 39th comment

The perfect focal length for a single camera phone. Too bad companies downgrade the WWA camera of their phones. The one I use the most.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2021 at 17:21 UTC as 74th comment
In reply to:

unhappymeal: And so it begins... We knew the day would come when smartphones would come after the smaller sensors in earnest. Now all they need is multiple focal lengths paired to that 1" sensor and it's going to be a serious blow to the compacts and m4/3.

@Bluevellet. Could not agree more.

Link | Posted on May 17, 2021 at 17:14 UTC

This imac is great value. The design could be the most beautiful thing if it wasn't for that chin. Huge. What apple does is differentiate it's products as much as possible, so people can see from far away that you're using an Apple product. Marketing genius.

Link | Posted on Apr 21, 2021 at 00:02 UTC as 74th comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

MinAZ: One thing I miss about all the old review sites going out of business is the fact that its hard to know if these new lenses are any good. Is there anywhere to get an objective review these days?

Christopher Frost is the best reviewer for this kinds of lenses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Mywjio4bLs&ab_channel=ChristopherFrost

Link | Posted on Apr 13, 2021 at 23:45 UTC

Apple loves "oversight". I have seen it in all of their products. Pretty much every company does. Shame.

Link | Posted on Apr 12, 2021 at 18:48 UTC as 27th comment
On article DPReview TV: Sigma fp L first impressions (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rihass: Nicely done Sigma. Now you only need to make the grip your camera is missing.

No, you guys are right. That is why sigma cameras sell so well.

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2021 at 14:51 UTC
On article DPReview TV: Sigma fp L first impressions (160 comments in total)
In reply to:

Rihass: Nicely done Sigma. Now you only need to make the grip your camera is missing.

It was a joke. Grip attachments are the worst.

Link | Posted on Mar 28, 2021 at 00:03 UTC
On article DPReview TV: Sigma fp L first impressions (160 comments in total)

Nicely done Sigma. Now you only need to make the grip your camera is missing.

Link | Posted on Mar 27, 2021 at 22:53 UTC as 28th comment | 5 replies
In reply to:

Rihass: "For this new king of technology you will be paying only $3799.00 extra".

This is precisely why standalone cameras are dying. It is stuck in the past and refuses to move forward. They have a base of faithful conservatives afraid of change and innovation. The fact that not a single major camera player today has a camera that uploads directly to social media goes to show how old the consumers of this cameras are. Life is not just work. A camera with a smart OS wouldn't hurt. Samsung tried that and got bashed for trying something new. Yes, Leica is an expensive Luxury POS, IMHO. It offers absolutely nothing as far as innovation goes. Updates like this are a big joke.

Link | Posted on Feb 1, 2021 at 01:53 UTC
In reply to:

Rihass: "For this new king of technology you will be paying only $3799.00 extra".

Look, it was a joke in case you didn't get it.

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2021 at 18:18 UTC
In reply to:

Rihass: "For this new king of technology you will be paying only $3799.00 extra".

Is the camera free?

Link | Posted on Jan 31, 2021 at 18:08 UTC

"For this new king of technology you will be paying only $3799.00 extra".

Link | Posted on Jan 30, 2021 at 14:31 UTC as 14th comment | 8 replies

Finally fuji came around to the awful grips they have. Well done Fuji. Just wish it was 4k 60p.

Link | Posted on Oct 16, 2020 at 22:07 UTC as 3rd comment

I asked the question a year ago. Why don't Canon And Nikon release a telephoto lens with smaller aperture? Since the MFT uses telephoto with "wide aperture", but the equivalent aperture is close to F11. Well done Canon.

Link | Posted on Jul 10, 2020 at 19:42 UTC as 33rd comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

lawny13: Biggest issue with the ipads/iphones.

The apps. How many dead not supported apps are there out there? On my MBP, I can run windows, VMs, Linux, and a whole list of software applications that might be otherwise obsolete were I using a ipad pro. Dragging and dropping. copy and pasting etc etc etc. All of these sorts of things make a computer way more productive than an apple tablet.

If apple came out with a more complete OS then great. Essentially a OSX revamped for tablet, rather than coming from the iOS side of things.

Basically this sort of device might work for non-power users. But I really can't see it taking over 100% of what I need a computer for.

Ipad has some great apps, but there are so many apps you pay for, that don't even work. I lost so much money to apple because of this. People blame Android for not having great apps, while that might be true, I have never bought an app on android that didn't work and in cases I didn't like the app I could always get my money back. As for games, OMG what a waste of money. Games last like 15 seconds and get you right back at the menu, play for another 15 seconds and there you are again clicking those menu buttons. Not fun.

Link | Posted on Mar 20, 2020 at 01:00 UTC
In reply to:

dereken: Speaking of the cameras, doesn't it make a lot more sense to have the good cameras on the front? I would think front cameras are used a lot more often for video calls on these tablets.

Finally. With a display this large, those cameras on the back are such a waste.

Link | Posted on Mar 18, 2020 at 22:34 UTC
In reply to:

Alphaville: Maybe more powerful on paper with high-end tech specs (although... 100x zoom?) but Samsung’s cameraphones will never reach iPhone’s simplicity and image quality consistency (as well as accessory and app ecosystem)

Mess*

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2020 at 14:42 UTC
In reply to:

Alphaville: Maybe more powerful on paper with high-end tech specs (although... 100x zoom?) but Samsung’s cameraphones will never reach iPhone’s simplicity and image quality consistency (as well as accessory and app ecosystem)

When you mean simplicity, are you talking about having to go to phone settings to change camera settings? Or the blurry mass and no low light mode on the wide angle camera? Iphones have great cameras and just like samsung, apple has tons of flaws right out of the box. I have an imac and 2 ipads. Love apple products but no cell phone manufacture are excluded from the technology mass. Not a single one.

Link | Posted on Mar 2, 2020 at 03:13 UTC
In reply to:

cam2013: i am watching all these so called dslr images on 27 inch screen and i am unable to see the difference between this and mobile phone pictures .....without pixel peeping.
Night shots are different story though.
Am i missing here something.

Wow. You really need to have your eyes checked. Honestly, the difference from APSC to FF is smaller than a phone to an APSC sensor camera.

Link | Posted on Feb 28, 2020 at 21:27 UTC
Total: 203, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »