fpessolano

Rumours pointed at a surprising price. But they are all they are rumours … and pricing is always relative.

Great, next now. Z9 ... and hopefully the price surprise is a good one!

I guess by the time we have a z11 maybe I can get a second hand z9 :-)

I am starting to save ….

If not my software would support it … sooner or later.

I cannot find it anywhere here :-)

Will get one when I can, love the square, but sometimes I miss the wide format.

This won’t change anything.

And in the meantime important things are ignored

Some samples a really nice, some pretty bad (I mean due to the lens) … makes it very difficult to assess what is this lens for.

What is the problem with manual lenses?

I think you need to read carefully, instead of inferring whatever you should have inferred that my FF means I have a FF and as such my statement is valid (and subjective)

Except that I wrote that given the difference in size and weight I would probably  grab my FF instead of the Fuji. Nowhere’s written something about 35 vs 33 on a Fuji.

I think you never use a FF. I own a xt3 with the 35 1.4 and a z7 with a 50. Size/weight/handling have very little difference. So a bigger 33 will make the Fuji system less interesting as ff ...

Honestly, I think who owns a 70-200 FL is pretty fine and does not need the S. If I had any other older version I would replace it with the S.

Well the screen shot does not place the mount int he same position … the new one is larger and enough to make the entire set up as big as a FF.

Look nice but for that size, I would grab my FF instead of my Fuji. This is a great help vs GAS :-)

I fully agree, I came to Fuji for compactness and good optics (and no the 2.8 primes are decent optics). Once Nikon launched the Z I still kept the Fuji for its feel and marginal smaller size. But...

When my x-t3 dies so does my use of Fuji X system, no need to replace my older 35/23 with the new versions.

This one was taken with the ZF 135/2 from the bled castle. Really a lovely place.