Dolan Halbrook

Dolan Halbrook

Lives in United States Portland, OR, United States
Works as a Programmer
Has a website at http://www.reneeanddolan.net
Joined on May 23, 2000
About me:

Digital shooter since 2000, from Oly (E-10) to Canon
(D60), Pentax (K10D, K-7), and most recently Olympus (E-M5, E-M1).

Comments

Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »
On article Hands-on with the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 (497 comments in total)
In reply to:

lglass12189: ...and why is 4K video a must-have feature?

Also, 8MP stills from video. Makes shooting sports and action much easier for most folks.

Link | Posted on May 18, 2015 at 23:12 UTC
On photo Dan-11-ISO-800-f11 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (2 comments in total)

Perhaps I have low expectations, but the corner sharpness is pretty impressive compared to other fisheyes I've seen.

Link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 13:51 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On a photo in the Olympus 8mm f/1.8 Fisheye Samples Gallery sample gallery (2 comments in total)

Perhaps I have low expectations, but the corner sharpness is pretty impressive compared to other fisheyes I've seen.

Link | Posted on May 12, 2015 at 13:51 UTC as 1st comment | 1 reply
On article Olympus announces OM-D E-M1 firmware version 3.0 (49 comments in total)
In reply to:

MacroBokeh: honestly, at $2k price, I rather go with Sony A7 II (and with kit lens it's even a little bit cheaper) and no this is not to start a flame war neither it's a trolling. Im just saying my opinion =)

Where did you get $2k. EM-1 street price is closer to $1k.

Link | Posted on Feb 5, 2015 at 22:11 UTC
In reply to:

Lux Painter: The 25mmf1.8 sounds like an awesome lens and was long overdue. And based on Olympus reputation of building great lenses it should have a stellar performance.

But the price tag of $400 (twice the price of a full frame 50mmf1.8 lens) must be a sick joke!

Maybe Olympus is trying to ruin their m43 biz completely.

It makes sense that it's priced in accordance with the 45/1.8... it's very similar. What you and other posters seem to be missing about the "nifty fifties" is that virtually all of them are very old lens designs where the tooling and production costs have largely been amortized. I too wish it were cheaper, but Oly fancies itself a premium brand and will price their stuff accordingly. Lenses at the end of their production cycle are always more expensive than those at the end. The Pentax 50/1.4 vs 55/1.4 SDM is a good example. I got the former for $200 at one point. When the latter came out it was over $500.

Link | Posted on Jan 29, 2014 at 22:00 UTC
On article Panasonic Lumix DMC-GM1 Review (357 comments in total)
In reply to:

photobeans: Panasonic did something amazing here. The body of a true small point and shoot with a m43 sized sensor. Now, please release one with a fixed 1.8 or f2.0 lens.

Why bother with the fixed lens? You can go out and buy any number of nice fast primes for m43 right now and not be stuck with a single focal length. I don't think making it fixed lens would make it that much smaller, unless you were thinking retractable fixed lens like the GR. Personally I think the 14/2.5 would be a great match.

Link | Posted on Dec 23, 2013 at 03:17 UTC
In reply to:

Dolan Halbrook: It seems to have been mostly missed but this update adds camera profiles for pretty much all Olympus m43 bodies, the E-5, and XZ series. Great news for Oly shooters.

Note that I said camera profiles, not lens profiles.

Link | Posted on Dec 13, 2013 at 07:01 UTC

It seems to have been mostly missed but this update adds camera profiles for pretty much all Olympus m43 bodies, the E-5, and XZ series. Great news for Oly shooters.

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2013 at 17:40 UTC as 5th comment | 5 replies

Big news for Olympus m43 shooters like myself: finally there are camera profiles!

Link | Posted on Dec 12, 2013 at 06:54 UTC as 21st comment | 1 reply
In reply to:

marike6: Wish Panasonic would update the 20 1.7. Keep the optics the same, with a more modern AF motor. I'd pre-order it immediately. Not many really good options for large aperture wide-to-normal lenses in m43 so I'm hoping that the almost perfect 20 1.7 gets a refresh.

I agree, but I think it still sells well enough that they have no motivation to update it. I'd love to see the internal focusing of the 14/2.5 in a 20mm model. And the optics are great, but if they could do something about the heavy purple fringing that would be nice as well.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 14:27 UTC
In reply to:

zinedi: Inceribly slow glass for such small sensor.

It ends up being about an effective stop slower on the wide end and about a half stop slower on the telephoto end. I'd hardly call that incredibly slow, at least compared to a comparable APS-C superzoom. But if you care about whether or not glass is fast or slow, why bother commenting on superzooms in the first place? That's like complaining that a zebra has stripes.

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 05:38 UTC
In reply to:

KrisPix: Interesting to see that Panasonic managed a slightly larger aperture, lower weight (460g to 265g) and intends to lower the price. Olympus recently did something similar (in terms of cost and performance at least) with the 75-300mm telephoto lens. Definitely good news for all M4/3 system users!

The press release seems to think it will still be quiet:

"Incorporating an inner focus drive system and stepping motor, The new LUMIX G VARIO 14-140mm / F3.5-5.6 ASPH. / POWER O.I.S. is capable of smooth, silent operation to work with the camera’s high-speed, high-precision contrast AF system for both photo and video recording."

Link | Posted on Apr 24, 2013 at 05:35 UTC

Flickr is taking baby steps in bringing itself up to date, but not at the rate that it should. I've been on Flickr since 2005, so it's not like i'm going anywhere, but i'd certainly like to see improvements. The new justified view in contacts and group pool is a nice start. Now let's see them do something similar with the photostream itself.

Link | Posted on Jul 20, 2012 at 14:16 UTC as 41st comment
On photo L1013612 in dpreview review samples's photo gallery (6 comments in total)

If this is "sepia" then it must be very, very mild, as it looks like straight B&W to me.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2012 at 19:38 UTC as 6th comment
On a photo in the Leica M-Monochrom Preview Samples sample gallery (6 comments in total)

If this is "sepia" then it must be very, very mild, as it looks like straight B&W to me.

Link | Posted on May 10, 2012 at 19:38 UTC as 6th comment
On article User Guide: Getting the most out of the Olympus E-M5 (271 comments in total)

Thanks! I'll definitely be playing with some of these settings when I get home.

Link | Posted on May 7, 2012 at 22:20 UTC as 128th comment

Glad to see DCResource and DPreview joining forces! I'll keep my eye open for the Mickey figure :)

Link | Posted on Apr 27, 2012 at 02:45 UTC as 52nd comment
On article Just Posted: Olympus OM-D E-M5 test samples (458 comments in total)
In reply to:

lester11: Sold my Panny GH2 to go to the Pentax K5 (weather-proofing, don't do much video), perfectly happy. Wife has the Panny G3, she's happy. The Oly E-M5 samples at 3200 and 6400 just astonishing in comparison, check out the "Thursday" and "15" date on the watch. Bugger. Two E-M5's now on pre-order...

I think the K-5 will still provide better IQ than the E-M5 all things being equal, but it's a very small gap, and the E-M5 is half the weight and size. As a K-7 owner it's exactly what I'm looking for.

Link | Posted on Mar 16, 2012 at 21:24 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon 1 V1 and J1 review (442 comments in total)
In reply to:

D200_4me: That's too bad about the relatively low score. Many pros have given this camera a big thumbs up for every day usage...and of course, I personally thing it's an outstanding camera, even though it lacks some external controls I'd love to have. My gallery full of outstanding photos from the V1 is evidence enough for me that it's a great camera.

@QuarterToDoom -- you could make that argument about virtually any camera reviewed here.

Link | Posted on Jan 21, 2012 at 00:13 UTC
On article Just Posted: Nikon 1 V1 and J1 review (442 comments in total)
In reply to:

mpgxsvcd: I sure wish we had the Panasonic GX1 and Canon G1-X reviews to compare against the Nikon 1 cameras. Those are the only cameras from those manufactures that really go head to head(G1-X not as much) against the 1 series. Thanks for getting the Nikon 1 review up though.

I'd say the Panasonic G3 is a pretty good match head on with the V1.

Link | Posted on Jan 20, 2012 at 21:20 UTC
Total: 34, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12Next ›Last »