ezradja

Lives in Indonesia Cirebon Jawa Barat, Indonesia
Works as a Wedding & Event Photographer
Has a website at www.facebook.com/laurasalon
Joined on Jul 28, 2004

Comments

Total: 241, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »

too expensive imo

Link | Posted on Sep 4, 2013 at 16:03 UTC as 66th comment | 3 replies
On article Ten one-of-a-kind cameras from the 21st century (250 comments in total)

Sony R1: 21,5 x 14,4mm 10MP sensor, 24-120mm 2,8-4,8
Canon G1X: 18,7 x 14mm 14MP sensor, 28-112mm 2,8-5,8
similar concept, very different size camera

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2013 at 23:22 UTC as 51st comment | 4 replies
On article Ten one-of-a-kind cameras from the 21st century (250 comments in total)
In reply to:

Anfy: I still own two Sony DSC-R1 and, at times, make use of them for portraits; I have the wide and tele converters as well, but they make the camera - not small in itself - so bulky you would not easily carry outside! :-)

Canon G1X probably the next generation (with a bit different concept) of Sony R1?

Link | Posted on Sep 3, 2013 at 14:14 UTC

LOL, Samsung, you are not a "Germanic" camera brand.

Link | Posted on Aug 29, 2013 at 16:40 UTC as 55th comment
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (621 comments in total)
In reply to:

RedFox88: So small, too small. Guess it is a camera for women? The picture of the a3000 being used by a man is pretty silly.

the Canon 100D is smaller though

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 12:03 UTC
On article Sony A3000 First Impressions Review (621 comments in total)

this with speed booster ...

Link | Posted on Aug 28, 2013 at 00:30 UTC as 92nd comment | 2 replies

the only instax mini I might like ...

Link | Posted on Aug 25, 2013 at 10:11 UTC as 46th comment
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

RobertSigmund: I have never read a more enthusiastic review. Certainly Pentax has bribed the tester, particularly for all the recommendations which cameras are better! :-D

really, bribery? that's a big accusation there! what's your prove?

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 01:02 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

fakuryu: If you hate this camera, probably you just don't understand it.

"IF" you hate ...
then, I would say: why hate...
it take a brain to decipher this logic though...

Link | Posted on Aug 10, 2013 at 01:00 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

chj: What a failed product. It's not small, it's not inexpensive, it doesn't have great IQ. Instead of a product that is the best of both worlds (camera size and image quality), Pentax decided to make a product that was the worst of both worlds. It's for someone that wants a toy to act like they have a "pro kit". Which would be fine for kids if it was cheap. But the same money could actually buy a good camera. So the market is for the kids of silly rich people?

what a failed "popular" product, do you mean? It even beat the Nikon 1 system!

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:28 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Katier: I have to say I find the review surprising. I use a basic Q and find it's performance excellent. It's ultra-compact nature with the 1.9 is very useful and I find IQ to be very good.

OK it obviously starts to get limited, especially ( in the Q with the smaller sensor) past around 800 ISO, but considering it's got such a small sensor high ISO performance isn't what it's about.

That said, the fact it runs with a 1.9 lens means that it's at least a stop better than the MLC competition unless your willing to spend over $1000 for a lens.

You can also do crazy things like put a 50mm f1.7 lens on it via an adapter and get a 210mm f1.7 (approx Q7) or 275mm f1.7 (Q/Q10).

In short, due to having high speed lenses the limited ISO range problem is reduced.. plus the compact size is a huge strength. I should add that have large hands and have zero problems with it.

Currently the Q is my main camera due to a DSLR theft, but I really only miss a view finder when compared to the DSLR.

The very good lens not mention here is the 15-45mm f/2.8.
I used a cheap magnetic viewfinder extender placed on the LCD when I needed it. Still not as good as OVF but at least it worked, on bright environment.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:26 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Gary Martin: I think this system would make more sense if it had a better selection of tiny fixed-focal lenses, allowing the camera to be pocketable. If you can't fit it in your pocket, you might as well go a bit bigger for the big jump in IQ you'll get from a much bigger sensor. This is supposed to be a fun camera to use, however, and its owners seem to love it.

those who has hold it in theirs hands would noticed the different sensation. I was sceptic myself before I used it.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:22 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

Dale108: The Q's main market is Japan, where is seems to be quite popular. I have the original Q and find it fun to use. IQ is also quite good and I find DR better than other small compacts such as the LX7.

Dale

yup, I noticed myself, the DR is quite wide for a smaller sensor like this. I have the original Q btw. the IQ with 8,5mm lens is very good, very sharp wide open.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:19 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

techmine: Its not that small after all :-)

err, you probably never had it in your hand, don't you LOL I also thought it too, it was not very small after all, until I hold it in my hand, it really quite small, compared to my G11 and G1X, it's a tiny fun camera :)

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:15 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)
In reply to:

fakuryu: If you hate this camera, probably you just don't understand it.

yup, I really don't understand, why you have to hate a camera, a thing, a non living thing, as if they are alive :) it's just a gadget. I still think Q system is good. I have the original Q, at first I don't really expected it to be so good. It's only different sensation when you hold it in your hand.

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:13 UTC
On article Pentax Q7 Review (240 comments in total)

decent/adequate IQ is on paper only, you have to use it to know why Q are fun to use!

Link | Posted on Aug 9, 2013 at 00:06 UTC as 82nd comment

I wonder if the Pentax Q has the same problem or in other hand, the Q series might be have better situation?

Link | Posted on Aug 8, 2013 at 23:18 UTC as 195th comment
In reply to:

burnin: All I see are overexposed photos. Just sayin'.

it's high key, not overexposed!

Link | Posted on Aug 4, 2013 at 23:22 UTC

horrible filters!

Link | Posted on Jul 27, 2013 at 03:44 UTC as 28th comment
Total: 241, showing: 21 – 40
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »