sybersitizen

I'm not sure what you're saying. A 16MP image from a camera with a 1/2.3" sensor could produce a larger printed image than one from a 12MP full frame camera based on pixel count, but it would be ...

Then they must have been RAW files from a camera supported by DxO products. From the user manual: Supported image formats DxO PureRAW 2 supports common RAW files, including images from Fujifilm ...

It could depend on what type of file you work with. I exported a Nikon .NEF from DxO PL5 to JPEG with metadata 'removed'. The software name was still present, as you have stated, along with some ...

Yep. That's how we get to see Open Talk posts saying, 'I bought what was supposed to be a new camera ... but it was unsealed, it had fingerprints on it, and the shutter count was 1643.' It's the ...

There are alleged size limits for posting in galleries (which I have not tested): https://www.dpreview.com/articles/7954574576/how-to-use-dpreview-galleries (1) Maximum of 20 MB or 20 megapixels in size

Are you talking about 720P HD instead of 1080P FHD? That isn't going to future proof anything. Maybe you meant you'll be shooting in UHD or 4K. Well, I wouldn't want to shoot every talking head ...

Look for ones labeled as Minolta Rokkor. There are dozens available on US eBay ... but don't buy one described as as-is or parts . https://www.ebay.com/sch/3323/i.html?&_nkw=minolta+rokkor+35mm+2.8 ...

That's up to you to decide. They can be stored in original quality, unchanged.

If you're talking about removing that texture, somebody should just undo whatever it was that caused it. It damaged everything, not just skin. In a normal photo, nobody's eyes are rendered with ...

That works, though some other minor metadata might be left in place. Photoshop's "Save for Web ...' can also do it.

Topaz Photo AI processing is often over the top. I normally leave sharpening disabled because it actually applies some sharpening even then, as part of the NR. When I do enable sharpening, I ...

You could try this: https://www.fastrawviewer.com/RawPreviewExtractor However, be aware that the extracted JPEG will probably have no noise reduction or sharpening or other processing tweaks ...

Forget the claims about what 'AI' is supposed to do. It's just not that smart. There are user controls in every piece of software that was referenced. What do you guys think they're for if not to ...

If both versions are 6000x4000 pixels, the resolution is the same and the dpi figure is irrelevant. However, be aware that the extracted JPEG will probably have no noise reduction or sharpening or ...

Try one of the state-of-the-art ''AI' noise reduction/sharpening tools that are now available. I've been using two of them (ON1 NoNoise AI and Topaz Photo AI) on JPEG film scans with good results. ...

Super. Just show the OP how to make all that and more happen in an automated batch process within Elements. I could do it within Photoshop by creating a series of actions with various prompts for ...

Whenever you have images that are finished and saved , you can then point the FastStone viewer to them to create new watermarked versions of them automatically. (I assume you'd want to keep the ...

Why does it have be within Elements? After you've finished your editing, you can create watermarked versions of your saved files using a different app. If you're using Windows, FastStone Image ...

IMO, comparing default settings is kind of pointless. Why not look for the optimal settings?

No, I wasn't talking about cropping (although that is an option that can also be leveraged). If you're just going to crop a M43 rectangle from the larger sensor, you would use the same focal ...