sybersitizen

Even if that's a reliable test, if you shot more than one type of Kodachrome (multiple types were available in overlapping years), the test would be inconclusive about which one it is.

Yes indeed.

Let's be doubly clear: There are two different Sony flash shoe mounts . If a flash for the Sony system fits either of the flash shoe mounts, it works with that mount. If it doesn't fit the ...

... mostly in the minds of people whose cameras don't have it . I think I like my IBIS a lot. Is it perfect? Of course not. Nothing is. That sounds like a particularly stupid 'complaint'. If that ...

The Sony system doesn't distinguish flashes by A or E lens mount. If the flash fits, it works. Even if it doesn't fit it will work with the proper adapter.

FastStone Image Viewer can do that. If they were processed by a Kodak lab, yes. If they were processed by some other lab - of which there must have been hundreds or maybe thousands - they might or ...

I vote yes.

The way that question is asked, I don't think you have a firm enough understanding of the difference between focusing capability and shutter speed. If focus is achieved, it's achieved ...

As with most discussions in most forums, some of us are satisfied before others are satisfied. I'm good, just as I was four days ago ... I don't know what the OP requires, though. He seems to have ...

It might be best to first choose a likely camera for your story - maybe the Vest Pocket Kodak . It does seem like something a regular person would use. Once you have the camera established you can ...

I don't own that camera ... but since it employs a sensor-shift mechanism that relies on electromagnets, I presume what you're feeling is the initial surge of current energizing them so they can ...

Okay. So if we substitute a better term instead of ISL, all is well.

I guess I'm not understanding your position. We know that the aperture in the 135mm lens is physically larger, and we agree it appears to be at a greater distance from the sensor than the one in ...

I just assume it's there within the lens itself, and that assumption is consistent with observation ... and it's definitely there in my light bulb analogy. If it's not there within the lens ...

I think you're wrong about that. I even conducted tests not too long ago, taking photos of what lens apertures themselves really look like from the sensor's point of view. Those photos showed, for ...

Absolutely. With one of my own Sonys. Absolutely, Going back to 2011 and earlier. As mentioned above, it's de-lamination of the top layer of Sony's TruBlack LCD treatment. Nobody knows why some ...

I don't know about most - but certainly many operate that way. Yes, it lacks that ability based on the information in several sections of the Instruction Manual and the Handbook.

More questions: Which do you prefer, better taste with less nutritional value or more nutritional value but worse taste? Which do you prefer, better looks and worse personality, or better ...

I can't imagine why that's surprising. Same scene + same f-number + same shutter speed + same ISO = same exposure and same image brightness. That sentence is only partly right. With identical ...

Your typical problem is close to an impossible task for a hand-held RX100III. Those people are in near-darkness! If you adjusted a single exposure in any way to make them visible then the entire li ...