Joined on Oct 23, 2011


Total: 286, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »
In reply to:

faterikcartman: What are the speeds with higher resolutions? Have to admit this could be a fun gadget.

You can do the math yourself. Take the throughput of 1.4 gigapixels per second and divide by the number of pixels in the chosen resolution. E.g. 4557 fps at 640x480.

Link | Posted on Oct 26, 2016 at 18:41 UTC

Why did Nikon use the serial number 60924 for their third camera?

Link | Posted on Oct 24, 2016 at 18:01 UTC as 41st comment | 2 replies
In reply to:

FLruckas: So in 8 months we get the rest of the missing features for yet another $400.....
Maybe Sony should wait before they innovate....
They're burning their fan base along the way.
Introducing products before they're really fully designed......

Who forced you to buy the a6300 if you weren't happy with the feature set?

Link | Posted on Oct 18, 2016 at 19:08 UTC
In reply to:

justmeMN: "Samsung pulled the plug on the Note 7 entirely, stopping all production and marketing of the device." -DPR

Will there be fire sales on the remaining Note 7 inventory?

Yes, get them while they're hot!

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2016 at 21:58 UTC
In reply to:

Scales USA: Li-on batteries are dangerous, and difficult at best. Larger ones have more energy and are potentially nasty. I'm not happy with IOS 10 and my IPhone 6 plus, so was considering selling it. The hardware is fine, but I just do not like the new OS and having to learn to shut down or bypass some of the features that are a nuisance. Its too bad that Samsung has booted it, I am leert of the Google phone, I'll wait and see.

You meant to say "by far the best iOS released to date."

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2016 at 21:56 UTC
In reply to:

Vahab: There are Windows phones out there, too.

Can't recommend them. I owned one for the past year, now I am a happy Android user again.

Link | Posted on Oct 11, 2016 at 21:53 UTC
In reply to:

KonstantinosK: Which reminds me: Whatever happened to those DL Nikons?

January. But what year?

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 21:11 UTC
In reply to:

Catalin Stavaru: $1000/€1200 ? OMFG...what has the world come to ?

Expect that trend to continue, as vendors will focus more and more on the advanced amateur and pro markets. Cheap photography is possible with any phone nowadays.

Link | Posted on Oct 6, 2016 at 21:11 UTC
On article Google Pixel tops DxOMark's Mobile rankings (116 comments in total)
In reply to:

vscd: Google is getting everywere now... I can't get to the toilett without finding something from them.

Just flush the phone down the toilet. Problem solved.

Link | Posted on Oct 5, 2016 at 01:12 UTC
On article Google Pixel tops DxOMark's Mobile rankings (116 comments in total)

I was shocked to see a value of 89 for a phone - this is the same score as my full frame Alpha 99.

Then I realised it is DxO Mobile, a separate ranking. You should have mentioned that.

Link | Posted on Oct 4, 2016 at 19:12 UTC as 28th comment | 12 replies
In reply to:

justmeMN: Hmm. The winner of Most Exciting addresses a tiny niche. The First Runner Up is from a company with a camera-imaging division that is on a seven year money losing streak. The Second Runner Up is a update of a camera line that has been a marketplace failure.

OK, I guess that says a lot about the products that didn't even make it into the list.

Link | Posted on Sep 26, 2016 at 16:29 UTC
In reply to:

mailman30: so what is a 63mm lens in 35mm terms with a sensor size of 43.8 × 32.9mm, as opposed to 24 x 36mm for 35mm?

Teila: that was exactly my point. Anything larger than 35mm film (and less than large format) can be called medium format. It theoretically suffices to increase the sensor by just 1mm in one dimension.

Link | Posted on Sep 22, 2016 at 00:28 UTC
In reply to:

mailman30: so what is a 63mm lens in 35mm terms with a sensor size of 43.8 × 32.9mm, as opposed to 24 x 36mm for 35mm?

I wonder when they will release a camera with a crop factor of 0.99 just to call it "medium format".

Link | Posted on Sep 21, 2016 at 16:38 UTC
On article Photokina 2016: Hands-on with Sony a99 II (438 comments in total)
In reply to:

Nobby2016: what about the aperture closing down for fast shooting?

i read for 12 FPS you basically shot at f9.. is that true or did someone tell me BS?

Stop spreading FUD unless you can prove it.

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 12:18 UTC
In reply to:

AEY: What about playmemory App? Can you install in this camera

This camera is not a toy. Why would you install "play memories" apps?

Link | Posted on Sep 20, 2016 at 10:08 UTC
In reply to:

Wilight: "The precision AF system also performs exceptionally in low-light conditions, as it will function properly in brightness levels as low as EV-4 and in dark locations where most other cameras struggle"

That's a big deal! :D

But not at f/2.8

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 23:58 UTC
In reply to:

sdgreen: I can't believe they've ditched the GPS. It's such a useful feature. Maybe it affected battery life

So you mean a tiny GPS antenna and a chip in a $200 phone must be better than GPS in a $3200 camera? Doesn't sound very convincing to me.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 23:56 UTC
In reply to:

Thuravi Kumaaran: Tempting Sony, as and always famous for.
If it has user friendliness, dreamy Canon colors (sorry, my taste) and great end result,then this may be a great, game changer.

This is an update of the A99. Nothing revolutionary here.
If the A99 was not a game changer for you, this won't be either.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 17:45 UTC
In reply to:

AstroStan: Although the concept of SLT is enticing, I have stayed away from it based on prior experience with beam splitters. Dust on the splitter can be ruinous (dust shadows at slower f-ratio) and cleaning may damage the splitter. Do current SLT users find this to be a problem?

No. The problem is the light loss, not the dust.

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:47 UTC
In reply to:

gameshoes3003: Person ignorant of the A-mount here. From what I'm understanding, these A-mount cameras have a translucent mirror, right? Does that mean that there is less light reaching the sensor? Do you have to start cranking up the ISO earlier relative to other cameras?

I have not had time to read the specs yet but from what I understand at first glance this is a DSLR not a DSLT -> no translucent mirror, no light loss

Edit: scratch that - "In addition Translucent Mirror Technology, with no moving mirror, ensures steady, continuous AF operation and live image preview during both still image and video shooting"

-> disappointment

Link | Posted on Sep 19, 2016 at 14:37 UTC
Total: 286, showing: 1 – 20
« First‹ Previous12345Next ›Last »