paratom

yes and no. The Z9 might have less rolling shutter effect but the R5 has a mechanical shutter and when you use it the is no rolling shutter problem at all. personally I choose Canon because lighter ...

I once have owned both cameras. The rd-1 was cool with the analog instruments and the first digital body to accept Leica M lenses. Today I would buy every digital FF-Leica M over the RD-1 though. T ...

I heard this as well but who cares if it is a rumor or true. I must say the R3 is one if not the "nicest feel in the hand" camera for me when shooting sports. It sits so stable in the hand and is ...

I really like no 1-4 and 6. For me No5 is too private to post in a forum. But that's just me. Sorry I ask but does the girl/model know these images are posted in a forum?

mmh, used R3 vs new R6II how much money? And why extra reach? PS: nothing against r6II great camera

and then you shoot on the dance floor with a manual Samyang instead of a RF 85/1.2?

What would you gain to sell a R3 for a R6II?

No, its not a steep learning curve and why should you not use it as an amateur if you like to. IMO you do gain a (small) step up in color and dynamic range, and a nice natural rendering.

The x2d focuses quite accurate in my experience. Lenses (v) are nice small size and low weight. Resolution of the combo is outstanding. I don't have S3 (I did betatest it however) but S007 and I ...

I really like my gr3x but its by far not the "only" compact mirrorless system. A Canon g1xiii is far more flexible, even if IQ is not up to the fixed Ricoh lens. Then there are various compact 1 ...

75 is a little more flexible, if you combine with 35 you can skip 50, images are slightly more dynamic. 90 gives a little more compression than 75,  its more difficult to see indoors because of the ...

I use both systems, but why you don't use just an M body if you prefer M lenses?

Long time M user (35 years) and had a Q2 for many months. Here is my take: Q2: + faster to use because of AF + nice light 1 lens one camera solution + better minimum distance + EVF helps to use ...

I tried it and it seems to work ok, but I don't trust it and rather use the joystick and other options. I have deactivated it on my R3 constantly. Otherwise I love the R3, but Eye AF is not for ...

only you know how close or far your subjects are. Also how big do you want to print? If I had to choose I would rather be on the safe side and bring the 100-500, I even would throw in a TC1.4. Too ...

You don't need the 200-600 since you have the 100-500. You only need the 70-200/2.8 if you either want to shoot indoor sports or if you like to use this lens for shallow dot portrait work in this ...

I own R3 and R5 (first R5 later R3 for sports and action). I think R3 and R6II might be too close in low MP and good high ISO. If you keep R3 and R5 you have best of both world, one high ISO fast ...

I compared some shots between the iPhone 15 pro and gr3x. While the camera of the iPhone is quite good, to me the shots look slightly over sharpened and over processed. For example it looks like ...

I recently wanted a small fixed lens camera. First I thought about a Q2 or x100v. But the size and focal length of the GR3X convinced me. I have had it just one day and already love it! It's so ...

I have used Nikon (incl. D500) and Canon over the years. 1) one time Canon is leading one time Nikon, switching usually is expensive and after some years you might switch back. I switched anyways ...