merkator

@ecka84 "Which only makes me doubt your judgement. You must be viewing them too small."
Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker. What did you mean by "viewing them too small"? I'm a pixel peeper...

@ecka84 I'm not a Fuji user and never used their cameras before. But I have to agree that FF is really an overestimated system especially for a hobbyist photographer. When you compare the image...

Ah I see. I had Nikon's DX DSLRs. And the one DX prime was 35mm f1.8. Most of them are for FX. Weird policy, of course.

Well Canon has 22mm, 28mm and 32mm primes for EF-M, 3 Sigma primes coming soon. And we have great manual Samyang 12mm f2.0 wide-angle prime. Not a great selection but better than nothing as Nikon.

What's the point of a low cost FF body, if the FF lenses are expensive? I own an old Sony a7r, it's quite affordable at this time, but the lenses aren't. I will sell it, because FF lenses are heavy...

Where was Nikon in 2015 when I have switched from Nikon D7000 to Sony's mirrorless apsc-c, because I needed some compact camera but with the same size sensor. I wish Z50 was in 2015 with all my...

@T3 Not everybody wants to upgrade to FF. For example, users of Fuji can't upgrade, it is APSC only, but the Fujis ecosystem is great anyway. Yes, with the new mirrorless Nikon you can buy FF...

Wow, even the EF-M lenses lineup looks more promising right now. Yes, they have FF lenses for the Z mount, but the lenses are too heavy and pricey for the new aps-c body. Nikon is too late with...

What do you think, Sigma 56mm f1.4 or adapted Canon EF 85mm f1.8 via Viltrox speedbooster in terms of bokeh quality? Sigma should be sharper though.

Look at them even at 50% and texture becomes really bad. ISO 1600 is just awful (

I have this camera, it's really nice and pocketable, but it's not sharp.. looks like the new Canons are much better in terms of sharpness.

The asteroid which costs more and has worse quality photos. A nice asteroid indeed.

The size of the DSLRs are the limiting factor. I'm with mirrorless compact cameras since 2015 and never come back. It's always with me in my backpack with compact laptop and I don't need an...

Yes, it lacks native lenses, but what's the problem to adapt EF/EF-S lenses, they work like native lenses. You can also get full frame look of your photos with a speedbooster, it's a very nice...

It's a better photographic tool for Instagram and messengers. Nothing more. Even on a regular desktop FHD monitor you can clearly see the difference in quality. Especially with any lens better than...

@CaPi I had a Nikon D7000 and it's a heavy camera for my needs.
@Duncan M thank for your reply, I agree the Z-system looks promising, but it costs a lot, the camera and lenses are not affordable. ...

Nikon, why don't you produce any mirrorless apc-c camera? You force to switch me to another brand.. The Z cameras are good but they're too heavy and pricey for enthusiasts.

The sharpness looks unnatural because of over sharpening in PS..

I think they should discontinue their APS-C DSLR lineup and move users to the M-mount as soon as possible. Their mirrorless cameras are quite good, the only thing is they need more native lenses....

Sony makes good mirrorless cameras (I had A6000), but it has really weird lens selection for APS-C, I switched from Sony, because Canon M series has 35mm equivalent pancake lens 22m f2.0 and...