chris gunn

The horizon is probably important.

Nice! After using the K-1, I really appreciate the lack of AA filter when pixel peeping. I'd switch my K-5 for a K5iis in a heartbeat!

For my visual comfort, I  appreciate the Rule of Thirds or Fifths, which I don't think you used in your composition.

I just had a quick look in this thread. Aside from you, it's 100% happy. Statistically speaking, your claim seems unlikely, and extreme. Perhaps you are suffering from confirmation bias?

I don't remember a single complaint, until yours.

Mines perfect. Heavily used.

Very nice! After trying the K-1, I'm thinking of upgrading my K-5 to a K-5iiS

You forgot to sharpen after resizing! The laser image is pretty cool.

Surprisingly sharp for 1/200s. And f16! You were lucky ;-)

I didn't know Sequator could do that. Interesting!

Dramatic and dark locations! 8x30s stacks, and both FG and BG look sharp without separate PP? Magic!

Degraded? Put them up in your DPR gallery please!

That would have been satisfying!

Lovely composition with the flowers, but I want more sharpness!

Very nice. Balanced with fun details/textures.

A lot more dedication to photography than I like to make! Impressive Pano. Astro you say? Looking forward to it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bahtinov_mask I got a cheap Chinese one from Ebay. You can make your own with paper I suppose. Of course! 20s. This subject is so close to the pole it suggested it ...

ISO isn't very important, if I understand things right. Raising ISO mainly reduces your dynamic range? There may be some in-camera noise reduction, but if you are stacking it doesn't help much if ...

I recommend this guy's tutorials: http://www.clarkvision.com/galleries/gallery.astrophoto-1/web/eta-carina.300mm.rnclark.c03.17.2018.0J6A1152-1240av86.h-1500s.html He uses Image Plus to make the ...