chris gunn

Nice shape to it!

Very cool. There are a large number of delightful details here. I like most everything about it! Quality PP. Only!

Well, it's sharp, and I can see some subtle nebulae variation. So, your tracking and focus is good! You don't say what your exposures were. Looks noisy. I haven't used PI, so I can't give any ...

Well if you like that, the Pano I did immediately after: Little River, Canterbury, NZ

24/1.4

That central, at f/1.4? I'm not sure... These days I do panos at f/2 and 60s. F/2 is better than f/1.4 I use f/1.4 for the foreground and timelapses only. My aurora TL @f/1.4: ...

You think you're rusty! "flow".... I've seen that parameter before...

It looks at least as good as mine. I hadn't heard of this 14/1.8 before. That could have applications! Auroras, meteors...

Thanks! I hadn't expected dramatic at the time. I did this pano: and then waited for the clouds to go.. and then they came back after I started! I had thought it was just a wave mismatch on the ...

Thanks. That's what I like to see, a perfectionist! I see you also do large colourful panos. I had thought #1 was just moving waves, but you're right, that includes the horizon. #2 and #3 may be ...

Thanks. I like to think it describes the average astrophotographer! Out alone in the dark with only the stars for company.

Thanks! Or in this case, colourful skies!

Thanks. Her white puffer jacket is a wee bit spacesuit-ish!

A Sigma 18-36/1.8 (I think "-36") is recommended here, and I've seen good results, Also the Tokina 11-?/2.8 zoom, and the 15-30/2.8. The only zoom I've tried was a Pentax A70-210/4. Not recommended.

That's rather short, is  it a mirror?

The  fish really makes this image!